The paper "There Is Only One Best Way to Manage " is a perfect example of management coursework. The modern-day organization operates in an ever-changing environment. Today’ s organization is very different from the 1990s organization. With the current developments in the technological environment, the rise of social media has meant that today’ s organizations cannot be managed in the same way as yesterday’ s organizations owing to the fact that the two types of organizations have been exposed to different types of challenges. In a bid to maneuver through these challenges at different times, different ways or styles of management have emerged.
These range from autocratic, persuasive, democratic, chaotic, Laissez-faire among other management styles all aimed at ensuring that organizations are effectively and efficiently managed (Fineman et al, 2005). With all these management styles, the question that arises is; is there one best way to manage or should all the management ways be applied together? It is as a result of the so many management styles that there has been confusion on their application with some people arguing that organizations ought to develop a one best way of managing themselves while others argue that there should be no one best way to manage and that the management style chosen by a particular organization should depend on its circumstances.
Although one best way to manage would have its merits, this essay argues that there is no one best way to manage. Instead, the essay advocates for a contingency kind of management whereby each organization and manager should look at its environment and circumstances in deciding how to manage. This is because managers and organizations are faced with different circumstances and challenges and applying a single management style as the best way to manage for all organizations would have detrimental effects to some organizations while it would work for others depending on their circumstances. In the 19th Century, Frederick Winslow Taylor in a bid to ensure efficiency in organizational management came up with the scientific management theory which advocated for organizations coming up with one best way of doing things.
The same notion is held by the bureaucratic theory that advocates for a hierarchical way of organizational management.
All these theories for a long time advocated for a one size fit all kind of management style. According to its advocates, one best way to manage would ensure no confusion regarding how things are done in an organization at all times (Burnes, 2006). Thus, this would result in improved productivity, increased employee incentive, widespread improvements in quality control, better personnel practices and greater cooperation between employees and management while ensuring that time is significantly saved and hence the costs associated with this. However, the one best way to manage notion has been challenged by the contingency theory of management.
Contingency theory advocates for no one best way to manage and those organizations ought to be managed depending on their circumstances. This is the basis of this essay’ s argument that there is no one best way to manage.