Essays on Without Work, There Can Be no Leisure Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Without Work, There Can Be no Leisure" is a great example of business coursework.   There could be no better time to redefine the correlation between work and life in the contemporary world than now. The world is becoming smaller thanks to technology and innovation and global economies are involved in relentless efforts to transform the economic fortunes of the societies. As a result, leisure and work are gaining more economic facet; both in definition and practice (Haworth & Veal 2004, p. 88). In the conventional setting, there has been a point of agreement that leisure and time are related and they exist interdependently.

As a result, it would be impossible to define one without the other or worse still, embrace one in isolation from the other. Leisure and work are separated by some core aspects but this does not affect the way their relationship is built and the contribution of this correlation to the overall social and economic structure of the society. This paper highlights the correlation between work and its impact on leisure. Work and leisure are defined on the same platform in the face of rigorous physical and mental involvement in social and economic structuring of the society in the 21st Century despite the fact that the gap between them is growing by the day.

As countries invest in industries, there is an increased workload and employees are spending a large portion of their time at the workplace. In the same scale, the economic hardships are forcing people to forego free time in favor of making extra cash even after work (Gelber 2013, p. 13). Whereas work and leisure are strongly linked, this relationship is not automatically beneficial; but this does not defeat the fact that they stay connected and understood from the economic, political and social perspectives.

Additionally, work and leisure have a huge contribution to make towards the wellbeing of an individual and the society in entirety (Blackshaw 2010,p. 101). In turn, the relationship between work and leisure in the 21st century is mostly argued from the economic point of view. What value do they add to society or person? Out of this thinking comes a school of thought that leisure and work complement one another to shape society in terms of spending time.

Work can be defined in several ways but those meanings are based on one common denominator; financial gain. According to Overell (2009,p. 16), work refers to any physical or social activity that culminates in financial compensation. It is a regular or occasional undertaking that people engage in as a source of livelihood. Accordingly, the meaning of work is manifested in the satisfaction that a person derives from it and as such, any activity that does not meet such conditions is prone to be considered a waste of time. Eichler and Matthews (2004,p. 47) define work from an economic dimension as a collection of activities which culminate in the production of goods and services to satisfy one and/or for financial gain.

Therefore, the meaning of work from the economic frontier is universal among all communities because we all need these essential goods for survival. Work is the engine that drives society and makes the environment inhabitable; it creates wealth and empowers people to meet other obligations that combine to make a comfortable life.

In the same context, the amount of work done is dependent on the degree to which one desires to achieve certain ends. If an individual can work for a few hours a day and be able to satisfy his needs, this is permissive. However, this should be in line with the overall structure and schedule of the working environment. The man simply works to achieve something in the end. Thus, if there is no foreseeable gain insight, work has no meaning (Becchetti, Ricca & Pelloni 2012,p 453-490).

References

Becchetti, L., Ricca, E. G., & Pelloni, A. 2012. The relationship between social leisure and life satisfaction: Causality and policy implications. Social Indicators Research, 108(3), 453-490.

Blackshaw, T. 2010. Leisure. Routledge.

Eichler, M., & Matthews, A. 2004. What is work? Looking at all work through the lens of unpaid housework. Manuscript). Retrieved from http://wall. oise. utoronto. ca/events/WhatisWork. pdf. Post-retirement practices, 131.

Gelber, S. M. 2013. Hobbies: Leisure and the culture of work in America. Columbia University Press.

Haworth, J. T., & Veal, A. J. 2004. Work and leisure. Psychology Press.

Jiménez, M. R. 2014. The Political Economy of Leisure. A Contemporary Cuba Reader: The Revolution under Raúl Castro, 173.

Mojza, E. J., Lorenz, C., Sonnentag, S., & Binnewies, C. 2010. Daily recovery experiences: The role of volunteer work during leisure time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(1), 60

Overell, S. 2009. The meaning of work. The Good Work.

Stebbins, R. A. 2015. Between work and leisure: The common ground of two separate worlds. Transaction Publishers.

.Rojek, C. 2013. Is Marx still relevant to the study of leisure?. Leisure Studies, 32(1), 19-33.

Rojek, C. 2013. Capitalism and Leisure Theory (Routledge Revivals). Routledge.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us