The paper 'Managing the Next Wave of Enterprise Systems' is a great example of a Management Assignment. An enterprise-wide resource planning system encompasses a set of management tools that achieve a balance between the supply and demand of a corporation. It yields enhanced productivity, improved customer service, and the reduction of inventories and costs. Similarly, ‘ best-of-breed’ software applications achieve similar results. However, different vendors develop the application as opposed to an enterprise-wide resource planning system whose product design process is the responsibility of a single provider. It is also evident that the ERP systems require high degrees of technical integration and large scale integration thus increasing the complexity of the implementation processes.
Therefore, the decision of a firm to implement the enterprise-wide ERP software necessitates an intensive reengineering process to meet the needs of the business processes. Since the best of breed applications are less complex and integrated, they require minimal levels of integration (Light et al. 2000). The ‘ best-of-breed’ software applications are more relevant in the establishment of competitive strategies that yield an innovative supply chain. Even though ERP systems yield mass customization and the development of new industrial structures, the multiple-vendor best-of-breed applications yield the best results.
The implementation complexity suffices to be the other difference between the two approaches to enterprise software applications. It is evident that the ERP systems offer multiple synergies since they are more complex as compared to their best-of-breed counterpart (Brown & Vessey 2003). On the other hand, the best of breed software systems exhibit reduced complexity thus making the implementation and utility processes easier on the part of the organization. Furthermore, ERP systems use system upgrades to integrate the latest technological advancements in the market.
On the other hand, the stand-alone applications found in the best of breed programs guarantee the rapid functionality delivery of the best-of-breed enterprise systems. Leftwich Construction Engineers (LCE) chose paramedics as the best of breed solution to simulate the downtown of Miami City. The application turned out to be the most useful tool in the analysis of the mammoth traffic witnessed in the city. The three primary attributes that guaranteed the selection of the program include its scalability, perfect visualization capabilities, and ease of application.
The Insurance Australia Group chose the Sparx Systems to develop a single view of its systems so as to identify, analyze, and manage its complex infrastructure, interfaces, and applications. The standard architecture visual capability and model proved to be the most appropriate for the organization (Sparx Systems 2007). Strategy and expected benefits of the Enterprise-wide’ Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system The implementation strategy of an enterprise-wide resource planning strategy consists of two primary phases. The first phase entails the initial design of the project. The second phase comprises of the utility and the possible changes of the system depending on the feedback.
The cost-efficient scope governs the implementation strategy to guarantee the flexibility of the application. Moreover, expandability suffices to be the other aspect of the implementation strategy. According to Brown and Vessey (2003), the implementation of the project may either utilize incremental phases or the ‘ Big-Bang’ approach. The two methods determine the complexity of the project and its duration. In the quest to reduce the complexity of the project, the phased approach is the most appropriate.
It is effective in situations where there is insufficient knowledge about the technology used to develop the enterprise-wide system application. The method reduces the risks associated with the implementation of the project. However, the full roll-out approach is only applicable in situations where there is a high maturity of the knowledge related to the application.
Brown, C V & Vessey, I 2003, ‘Managing the next wave of enterprise systems: Leveraging lessons from ERP’, MIS Quarterly Executive, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 65-77.
CGI 2013, ‘The Cloud-Enabled Enterprise: Developing a Blueprint and Addressing Key Challenges’, The White Paper.
CGI 2014, ‘The Cloud-Enabled Enterprise: A Set of Transformation Strategies’, The White Paper.
Cognizant 2014, ‘Cloud-Enabled Enterprise Transformation: Driving Agility, Innovation and Growth’, Keep Challenging.
European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) 2009, ‘Cloud computing: benefits, risks and recommendations for information security’.
Fauscette, M 2013, ‘ERP in the Cloud and the Modern Business’, IDC.
Light, B, Holland, C P, Kelly, S & Willis, K 2000, ‘Best of breed IT strategy: an alternative to enterprise resource planning systems’, ECIS 2000 Proceedings, pp. 180.
MacKinnon, W, Grant, G & Cray, D 2008, ‘Enterprise information systems and strategic flexibility’, In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Proceedings of the 41st Annual (pp. 402-402), IEEE.
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect 2007, ‘Case Study: Developing an Enterprise-wide Architecture within Insurance Australia Group’.
Umble, E J, Haft, R R & Umble, M M 2003, ‘Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors’, European journal of operational research, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 241-257.
Wallace, T F & Kremzar, M H 2002, ‘ERP: making it happen: the implementers' guide to success with enterprise resource planning’, Vol. 14, John Wiley & Sons.