The paper "Characteristics of a Community, Data Collection" is an outstanding example of a management assignment. There are different community characteristics that the council need to consider when planning a needs assessment in setting up a community hall. Culture is a key characteristic in every community. As such, it affects the outcome of every activity carried out in the community. Culture refers to patterns of behavior, effective understanding, interactions, and cognitive constructions that are passed from generation to another (Jirojwong & Liamputtong 2009). These patterns give a community identity. The growth of culture culminates in the growth of a community.
Therefore, in establishing the community hall the council should carry out a culture study in order to know the kind of people that will be served by the facility (Barzilai 2003). Historical factors are characteristic of a community that has an impact on the development activities within a community. It is obvious that communities are products of their past and current development activities always take place against a historical setting. The council needs to consider conflict history, settlement, and population history as they play a major role in community resource management and cohesion.
Thus, in setting the community hall, historical factors should be considered as they may hinder the implementation of the project (Picus et al. Burke 2001). Social factors such as language, ethnicity, gender relations, family structures, and social divisions characterize a community. These salient have a profound effect on the cohesion of a particular community. The absence of balance in these social factors may result in the failure of various projects within the community. Therefore, it is important the council consider these factors in order to ensure that the social issues do not attract division in the community as a result of the community hall (Barzilai 2003). Finally, economic factors characterize a community.
These factors play a major role and determine whether people have a divergent or similar interest concerning the management of resources. Indeed, people’ s attitudes and perceptions towards resources within a community differ depending on the livelihood strategies. It is, therefore, important that the council consider this, as the community hall will be a resource in the community. The success of the community hall depends on the people’ s perception of the usefulness of the hall to their economic activities (Pittman & Philips 2009). Data collection Census is one way of obtaining data in the community.
The community consists of people that fall in different categories and can be obtained through census data. The planning council can provide the data in order to determine the size of the hall. Advantages of the census are a way to obtain data include; everyone is given an opportunity to participate. Therefore, no one in the community may feel left out or slighted; accuracy concerns are less.
Census enhances the feeling of security that surrounds the accuracy of the results; it is easy to administer. This is because all persons are included. Indeed, when compared to a sample survey, it is easier to administer. Finally, the census assists the community or government in planning for the future. As a data collection, the census has disadvantages. First, the method is costly and consumes time. Compared to the survey, the census survey is costly to administer. Costs are incurred during printing and data collection due to the volume of the material and the labor required.
Second, more time to administer. As everyone is involved in the census, additional administration time is required as compared to the survey. Thirdly, the method requires more training and support as compared to the survey.
Barzilai, G 2003, Communities and law: Politics and cultures of legal identities. Michigan: University of Michigan Press
Hanson, A 2007, Workplace health promotion: A salutogenic approach. New York: AuthorHouse
Hayday, S 2004, Promoting a healthy workplace. Ories Research Networks, 1-15
Jirojwong, S & Liamputtong, P 2009, Population health, communities and health promotion. South Melbourne: oxford University Press
Jupp, V & Sapsford, R 2006, Data collection and analysis. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc
Keast, b & Kendig, L 2010, Community character: principle for design and planning. Washington: Island press
Kirsten, W & Karch, R 2011, Global perspective in workplace health promotion. London: Jones & Bartlett Learning International
MacDonald, G & Bunton, R 2002, Health promotion: discipline, diversity and developments. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc
Patterson, M 2001, Health promotion in the workplace. London: CengageBrain
Pearce, l & Axinn, W 2006, Mixed method data collection strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni. Press
Picus, l, Picus, O & Burke, M 2001, Developing community empowered schools. New Delhi: Corwin volume Discounts
Pittman, R & Philips, R 2009, An introduction to community development. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc
Seedhouse, D 2004, Health promotion: philosophy, prejudice and practice. London: Wiley & Sons, Inc
Storey, J 2006, Cultural theory and popular culture. New York: Pearson Education.
Waller, S & Thom, B 2002, Prevention and reduction of alcohol misuse: evidence briefing, Health Development Agency, 12