The paper "Whether Governments Can Solve Wicked Problems" is an outstanding example of management coursework. This report has addressed the question of whether governments can solve wicked problems. The paper has asserted that governments can solve wicked problems that exist and this can effectively be done by acknowledging that, when dealing with wicked problems, governments are likely to face a number of challenges due to the uncertainty that is generated by wicked problems. This in a way makes them apparently intractable. In respect to these, there are three major types of uncertainty that exists and they include the institutional, strategic, and substantive uncertainties, and these need to be considered.
Governments need to make use of system thinking, collaboration and coordination, and mobilizing adaptive work in tackling wicked problems. Introduction This paper sets out to address the question of whether governments cannot solve wicked problems. Wicked problems are termed as those problems that seem impossible or difficult to solve due to the contradictory, incomplete as well as the changing requirements that tend to be difficult to recognize. Wicked problems are very prevalent in the society we live in and thus they are usually termed as ambiguous, ill-defined and they are usually associated with strong political, moral, and professional issues.
Their problems are strongly stakeholder dependent and thus there is little consensus on what the problem is actually a problem and therefore limits suggestions or ideas on how to best solve the problem. Previous attempts of handling wicked problems have led to a number of unforeseen consequences due to the instability of the problems and at the same time the inappropriate use and selection of the methods that can effectively handle them.
This has led to more problems than those, which had been detected in the first place. The main argument is that governments can in a way solve wicked problems that are prevalent in modern society. Discussion It is best to acknowledge that that though the paper will argue that governments can be able to solve wicked problems, it is effective to note that in doing so it is likely to face a number of challenges due to the uncertainty that is generated by wicked problems.
Goldsmith, S. and Eggers, W.D. (2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector, Washington DC: Brookings.
Heifetz, R.A. (1994). Leadership Without Easy Answers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Imperial, M.T. (2004). Collaboration and Performance Management in Network Settings, Report for IBM Center, Washington DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.H. & Koppenjan, F.J.M. (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.
Klijn, E.H. & Koppenjan, F.J.M. (2000). Public Management and Policy Networks. Public Management 2 (2): 135-158.
Koppenjan, F.J.M. & Klijn, E.H. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks. London: Routledge.
Lewicki, R.J., Gray, B. & Elliott, M. (2003). Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts, Washington: Island Press.
Lindquist, E. (2004). Strategy, Capacity and Horizontal Governance: Perspectives from Australia and Canada. Journal of Public Sector Management, 34 (4), pp.2-12.
Roberts, N.C. (2000). Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution. International Public Management Review 1 (1): 1-19
Van Bueren, E.M., Klijn, E.H. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (2003). Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (2): 193-212.
Wondolleck, J. & Yaffee, S.L. (2000). Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management, Washington DC: Island Press.