• essayintl.com >
  • Case Study >
  • Attractiveness of India and China for Australian Companies Interested in Developing Their International Markets

Essays on Attractiveness of India and China for Australian Companies Interested in Developing Their International Markets Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Attractiveness of India and China for Australian Companies Interested in Developing Their International Markets" is a good example of a marketing case study. As two of the world’ s greatest and fastest-growing nations of the world, India and China present a multiplicity of opportunities as well as challenges for investment by Australian companies. It is inarguable that China presents more opportunities for foreign direct investment as compared to India, which has largely been regarded an underachiever with respect to providing investment opportunities for foreign-based companies (Bajpai & Dasgupta 2004). China has sprung to overtake the United States as the best overseas investment market.

Additionally, China is raked ranked by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) as the 47th most preferred nation for investment by developing nations, with India ranking marginally at position 119 (Bajpai & Dasgupta 2004). In spite of the seemingly better position of China to attract foreign investment, it still presents challenges just as it can be noted for India. This report will analyze the market situation in the two countries based on a PESTEL analysis.

In particular, four major areas: political, economic, social-cultural and legal or institutional factors relating to an investment in the two countries will be given priority. The findings will be vital in determining the country that presents fewer challenges in view of Australian companies’ desire to invest in them. 2.0 THE ANALYSIS 2.1 Political Factors The political factors that affect the investment operations include inter alia government stability, taxation policies, government’ s regulation of business and so forth (Lukac 2005; Wei & Balasubramanyam 2004). Australian companies interested in venturing overseas certainly face risk.

In rapidly growing markets such as India and China, the risk is magnified because most business decisions are rarely made with due regard for the regulatory environment (Swaminathan et al updated; WTO 2008). Most of the current investment involves a standard assessment of market opportunities, partnering opportunities, financial structuring, and estimation of profits. What is fundamentally missing in both the Indian and Chinese markets, as is the case with many other developing nations, is a methodical evaluation of the regulatory atmosphere (Swaminathan et al updated; UNCTAD 2007). The role of governments in attracting investment is depicted in their commitment to providing security, and exercising discretionary power to facilitate a streamlined flow of business operations.

Players in the political field are cognizant of the fact that business performance strengthens stability and therefore give security a priority. This also involves giving an assurance that trade agreements and other binding policies will be honored. Along this line, China seems to outsmart India in terms of attracting FDI through higher growth rates, a larger domestic market, lower labor cost, and a more reasonable assurance that commitments between foreign investors and the government will be honored (OECD 2002).

In contradistinction, India provides lesser opportunities for Australian companies in spite of the fact that it has a differential advantage in terms of language and technological progress (Polaski et al 2008). Nevertheless, it has been reported that China’ s seemingly high propensity to attract FDI could be due to over-reporting of statistics due to ‘ round-tripping’ and India’ s low level of attracting FDI could be an as a result of non-conformity in the method used in estimating FDI in line with international standards (Shenkar 2004).

REFERENCES

Ambler, T; Xi, C & Witzel, M 2008, Doing Business in China, Taylor & Francis, New York.

Austrade, Available from www.austrade.gov.au (July 16 2009).

Bajpai, N and Dasgupta, N 2004, What Constitutes Foreign Direct Investment? Comparison of FIndia and China, CGSD Working Paper No. 1, Available from http://www.earth.columbia.edu/cgsd/documents/bajpai_fdi_india_china_003.pdf (July 18 2009).

Borooah, V K, Gustafsson, B & Shi, L 2005, China and India: Income Inequality and Poverty North and South of the Himalayas, Available from www.cshdelhi.com/resources/.../BoroahGugtassonShi.pdf (July 16 2009).

Brahm, L J 2004, Doing business in China: the Sun Tzu way, Tuttle Publishing, New York

Chow, D C K 1997, An Analysis of the Political Economy of China's Enterprise Conglomerates: A Study of the Reform of the Electric Power Industry in China, Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 28: 34-38.

Christmann, P & Taylor, G 2001, Globalization and the Environment: Determinants of Firm Self-Regulation in China, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 32: 45-49.

Communicaid 2007, Doing Business in China: Chinese Social and Business Culture, available from http://www.communicaid.com/access/pdf/library/culture/doing-business-in/Doing%20Business%20in%20China.pdf (July 16 2009).

Darley, W K & Johnson, D M 1993, Cross-National Comparison of Consumer Attitudes toward Consumerism in Four Developing Countries, Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 27: 67-70.

Gaiha, R & Kulkarni, V 1998, Growth Central to Poverty Alleviation in India? Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 52: 44-46.

Lukac, D 2005, Key Success Factors for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), BoD – Books on Demand, New York, p 167-174.

Manian, R 2007, Doing business in India for dummies, Wiley-India, Calcutta, p 297-305.

OECD 2002, FDI: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Costs, OECD, Paris, p 33-52

Panagariya, A 2008, India: The Emerging Giant, Oxford University Press US, New York, p 103-114.

Polaski, S; Ganesh – Kumar, A; McDonald, S; Panda, M & Robinson, S 2008, India’s Trade Policy Choices: Managing diverse challenges, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Mumbai, p 107-109.

Poston, D L 2006, Fertility, family planning, and population policy in China, Routledge, New York, p 167-168

Sharma, K 2000, Export Growth In India: Has FDI Played a Role? Yale University, New Haven, p 67-69.

Shenkar, O 2004, One More Time: International Business in a Global Economy, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35: 34-36

Swaminathan, S; Kugler, J; Thomas, J; Kugler, T; & Tammen, R undated, Government Efficiency and Investments in India, Available from faculty.lasierra.edu/~sswamina/gefdi.pdf - (July 16 2009).

Theil M & Ferguson, W L 2003, Risk Management as a Process: An International Perspective, Review of Business, Vol. 24: 56-61

Tian X 2007, Managing international business in China, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 81-89.

UNCTAD 2007, Rising FDI into China: The Facts behind the Numbers, Investment Brief Number 2.

Wei, Y & Balasubramanyam, V N 2004, Foreign direct investment: six country case studies, Edward Elgar Publishing, New York, p 81-92

WTO 2008, Reforms, including trade liberalization, have underpinned high growth but challenges remain, Available from http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp299_e.htm (July 16 2009).

Zhao, R 2007, Short Report: China and India: A comparison of trade, investment and expansion strategies, Chatham House, Available from http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/files/9201_010607workshop.pdf (July 18 2009).

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us