Essays on Difference between Regulations, Guidance, and Approved Codes of Practice Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Difference between Regulations, Guidance, and Approved Codes of Practice" is an outstanding example of finance and accounting coursework.   In some regulations, the term “ absolute” generally means that the regulations should absolutely have to be fulfilled (Blaus 2005, p. 66). In other words, the requirement must be met regardless of cost or any other consideration. The term ‘ absolute’ is often used where risk is very likely and the chance of death and severe injury is huge. For instance, if the regulation says that electrical equipment which capacity is less than the required specifications should not be used, then the standard of duty is ‘ absolute’ .

This is because precautions required by this regulation is evidently very simple and perhaps would not cost anything, and the resulting negligence would lead to death or severe injury, the level of duty to prevent this danger is considered ‘ absolute’ or must be met at all cost. Alternatively, the term “ reasonably practicable” requires someone to assess the magnitude of the risk of certain work activity or environment (Scaddan 2002, p. 208). If the measures necessary to avert the risk is large enough and insignificant to the level of risk involved, then the level of duty to prevent the risk is ‘ reasonably practicable’ (Stranks 2006, p. 18).

For instance, if the regulation says all electrical systems shall be constructed and maintained to prevent danger and all work activities are to be carried out so as not to give rise to danger, the level of duty to follow this regulation is ‘ reasonably practicable. This is because the amount of prevention involved is large compared to the possibility of risk. If it can be shown that there is a gross disproportion between these factors like risk being insignificant in relation to the sacrifice, then the extent of compliance is as reasonably practicable.

In other words, if the risks of injury are very small compared to the cost, time, and effort needed to diminish the danger, then no further action is required (Hughes & Ferrett 2008, p. 9). In health and safety, explain using examples, the difference between Regulations, Guidance, and Approved Codes of Practice. From the legal point of view according to Woolfson et al.

(p. 348), an Approved Code of Practice has a less binding legal status than the Regulations, although more so than non-mandatory Guidance.  

Bibliography

Banfield P. & Kay R. 2008. Introduction to Human Resource Management, Oxford University Press, US

Barrett B. &, Howells R. 2000. Occupational Health & Safety Law Cases & Materials, Routledge, UK

Bateman M. 2006. Tolley's practical risk assessment handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann, UK

Blaus J. 2005. Electrical installations: NVQ and technical certificate, Heinemann, UK

Boella M. J. & Pannett, A. 1999. Principles of Hospitality Law. Cengage Learning EMEA, UK

Booty F. 2006. Facilities management handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann, UK

Chandler P. & Waud C. 2003. Waud's employment law: the practical guide for human resource managers, trade union officials, employers, employees and lawyers, Kogan Page Publishers, UK

Evans D. 2001. Supervisory management: principles and practice, Cengage Learning EMEA, Singapore

Fewings P. 2008. Ethics for the Built Environment. Taylor & Francis, US

Fischbeck P. S. & Farrow R. S. 2001. Improving regulation: cases in environment, health, and safety. Resources for the Future, UK

Groák S. 1992. The idea of building: thought and action in the design and production of buildings. Taylor & Francis, UK

Holmberg K. & Folkeson A. 1991. Operational reliability and systematic maintenances. CRC Press, UK

Holt A. S. 2001. Principles of construction safety. Wiley-Blackwell, UK

Hughes P. & Ferret, E. 2008. Introduction to Health and Safety in Construction: The Handbook for Construction Professionals and Students on NEBOSH and Other Construction Courses. Elsevier, Slovenia

McCoy W. F. 2005. Preventing Legionellosis, IWA Publishing, UK

Narayan V. 2004. Effective maintenance management: risk and reliability strategies for optimizing performance, Industrial Press Inc., US

Reason J. T. & Hobbs A. 2003. Managing maintenance error: a practical guide, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., UK

Reese C. D. 2003. Occupational health and safety management: a practical approach, CRC Press, US

Regester M. & Larkin J. 2008. Risk Issues and Crisis Management in Public Relations: A Casebook of Best Practices, Kogan Page Publishers, India

Ridout B. et al. 1999, Timber decay in buildings: the conservation approach to treatment. Taylor & Francis, UK

Perry P. 2002. CDM questions and answers: a practical approach. Thomas Telford, UK

Scaddan B. 2002. Electrical Installation Work. Newnes, UK

Stranks J. W. 2006. Health and Safety Pocket Book. Butterworth-Heinemann, UK

Woolfson C, Foster J., & Beck M. 1996. Paying for the piper: capital and labour in Britain's offshore oil industry, Routledge, UK

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us