Essays on The Coaching Practice in Human Resource Development Report

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "The Coaching Practice in Human Resource Development " is a wonderful example of a report on human resources. The coaching practice is one of the facets of Human Resource Development (HRM). The continuing coaching practice in firms has enhanced the achievement of leadership outcomes in most of the prosperous businesses today. Professional coaches have successfully applied Kolb’ s Experiential Learning Theory as one of the means to enhance their coaching leadership capabilities. Any organization requires developing leadership skills essential to the effectiveness of the firm. HRM over the years has played a prominent role in coming up with strategies through leadership development, as well as establishing coaching programs for the firm’ s managers, and the rest of the staff working in the organization.

The coaching experience brings forward successful organizations whereby every staff shares the collective experience of serving as a leader. This has helped the coachee improve leadership skills (Lazar, 2003, p. 27). Kolb’ s experiential learning theory, therefore, provides us with a useful framework for coaching managers in developing the leadership skills necessary to manage complex situations. A coach will, therefore, adopt the learning style in order to mesh with the most preferred learning style the coachee prefers to make sure that the whole learning process is entirely enhanced.

There can be a risk to the coach who may unknowingly fall into the trap of the coachee relying heavily on their proffered coaching styles. The Kolb’ s learning model, therefore, provides professional coaches with a compelling lens from which to look at their own preferred coaching styles (Whitemore & Einzing, 2006, p. 34). Kolb’ s Experiential Learning Theory works on two levels, which include; grasping and transforming experiences.

Learning, therefore, involves two dialectical modes to grasp experience. The figure below shows the four modes of the coaching process. Fig. 1. Four modes of the coaching process (Rosinski, 2003, p. 78). During the coaching dialogue, “ meaning-making” becomes one of the processes whereby different perspectives and positions meet and can further be fully developed. The coachee approaches the coach during the coaching process with the intension that something must change or become different during his/her life. It is expected that the coach should challenge the various assumptions and understanding the coachee has on certain events, tasks, situations, or contexts.

It is also expected that the coach challenge all these issues with sensitivity and empathy with an intention to sense and grasp the situation from the coachee perspective. During the coaching process, the coach and the coachee engage in the coaching dialogue with the tangible understanding that a solution has to be arrived at. Together, they come up with a common understanding that they will shape meaning, as well as develop fresh or different stories about the particular events or contexts at hand.

Both the coach and the coachee are intertwined in a process of concreting “ meaning-making” with the intention that both parties change position and move towards a new understanding and insight (Rosinski, 2003, p. 81). The coaching process is essential to leaders since many people end up in careers as a coincident effect of advancement or as a by-product of seeking advanced responsibilities, and getting higher compensations for that particular position in their career. Some leaders even not having chosen to lead others in an organization is a drag on their probability of leadership.

When such leaders are faced with such challenges, the mentoring process becomes essential since it’ s through this process the leader can be in a better position to function well in the new position. Coaches become useful and are in the sole spot of being able to re-examine the circumstances around and reactions to becoming ahead. Therefore, coaches play a crucial role in offering a safe forum of considering options other than headship when true preferences lay elsewhere (McCauley & Van, 2004, p.

102).

References

Botelho, R. 2004. Motivate Healthy Habits: Stepping Stones to Lasting Change. New York: MHH Publications.

Haji, S. 2008. In The Spirit of Coaching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hughes, R. 2008. Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons from Experience. New York: Schwarz and Davidson publishing.

Lazar, J. 2003. Alignment Coaching: The Missing Element of Business Coaching. International journal of coaching in organizations, Vol 1(1), 13-29.

McCauley, D & Van, E. 2004. The Centre for Creative Leadership Handbook of Leadership Development. New Jersey: Wiley publishing.

Megginson, D. & Clutterbuck. 2005. Techniques for Coaching and Mentoring. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Rosinski, P. 2003. Coaching Across Cultures. New Tools for Leveraging National, Corporate and Professional Differences. London: Nicholas Brealey.

Schmitz, J. 2006. Cultural Orientation Guide: The Road Map to Cultural Competence. New Jersey: Princeton Training Press.

Whitemore, J. & Einzing, H. 2006. Transpersonal Coaching. Excellence in Coaching Journal, pp. 119-134.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us