Essays on How Social Is Your Network Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "How Social Is Your Network" is a great example of a case study on human resources. It is a clear fact that the utility of social network sites has increased in the recent past. This industry has recorded enormous growth, a fact which is evidenced by figures from January 2009 pointed to the fact that Facebook had slightly more than 175 million active users worldwide (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010, p. 49). At the beginning of 2012, Facebook had 900 million users and was projected to hit the 1 billion mark of active users by the beginning of 2013.

This depicts the enormous size of Facebook as a company and this number is projected to grow, with the overall global increase in internet use. This is coupled with its increasing penetration into other segments of the population, for instance, those commonly referred to as generation X (aged between 35-44 years) who have increasingly embraced this social network. On the other hand, Facebook has experienced increased utility in the HRM functions of different corporate bodies. This has raised privacy, legislative and ethical issues among different individuals and collectives, with some citing either positive or negative implications of its utility.

This issue remains contentious which forms the foundation of this essay. Against this background, this paper will explore the issue of privacy related to the use of Facebook in HRM functions in regard to the need for a balance between the rights of the employees and organizational consequences. In addition, it will critically analyze whether it is alright for employers to use these sites to glean information about their employees.

Lastly, it will assess how a progressive employer can turn the use of social networking sites into a win-win situation rather than an employer versus employee or win-lose situation. Privacy issues related to the use of Facebook in HRM functionsIn a generic sense, the basic definition of privacy to be adopted in this paper is derived from the work Privacy and Freedom (1967) by Alan Westin (cited in Simmons, 2011, p. 3). The author defines privacy as ‘ the claim of individuals, groups, or institutions to establish and determine for themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others.


Barker, P. 2008, ‘How social media is transforming employee communications at Sun

Microsystems’, Global Business and Organizational Excellence, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 6-14.

Berkman, R. I., & Shumway, C. A., 2003, Digital dilemmas: Ethical issues for online media

Professionals, Iowa State Press, Ames.

Bernoff, J. & Li, C. 2008, ‘Harnessing the power of the oh-so-social Web’, MIT Sloan

Management Review, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 3-42.

Birkman International, 2009, ‘Human Resources 2.0: How HR Professionals and HR Consultants

Use Social Media and Web 2.0 Technologies’, retrieved 09 January, 2013, .

Bolotaeva, V. &Cata, T., 2011, ‘Marketing Opportunities with Social Networks’, Journal of

Internet Social Networking and Virtual Communities, Vol. 2011, pp. 1-8.

Broughton, A., et. al, 2010, ‘Workplaces and Social Networking: The Implications for

Employment Relations’, paper prepared for Acas, Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.

Cocking, D., & Matthews, S., 2000, ‘Unreal friends?’, Ethics and Information Technology, Vol.

2, pp. 223–231.

Debatin, B. et. al, 2009, ‘Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended

Consequences’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 15, pp. 83–108

Ferreira, A. & Pressis, TD., 2009, ‘Effect of online social networking on employee productivity’,

Interword Communications, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-16.

Greenwood M, & Freeman, RE., 2011, ‘Ethics and HRM: The Contribution of Stakeholder

Theory’, Business & Professional Ethics Journal, vol. 30, Nos. 3–4, pp. 269-292.

Iachello, G. &Hong, J., 2007, ‘End-user privacy in human–computer interaction’, Foundations

and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–137.

Information Privacy Act, 2009, ‘Act No. 14 of 2009’, retrieved 09 January, 2013, <>.

Jones, TM., et. al, 1997, ‘Ethical theory and Stakeholder related decisions: The role of

stakeholder culture’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 137–155.

Kaplan, AM. & Haenlein, M., 2010, ‘Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities

of Social Media’, Business Horizons, Vol. 53, pp. 59—68.

Moqbel, M., 2012, ‘The effect of the use of social networking sites in the workplace on job

performance’, PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas.

Pankoke-Babatz, U., & Jeffrey, P., 2002, ‘ Documented norms and conventions on the Internet.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 219–235

Pfarrer, M., 2010, ‘What is the Purpose of the Firm?: Shareholder and Stakeholder Theory’,

retrieved 09 January, 2013, <>.

Privacy Commissioner in Australia, 2010, ‘The adequacy of protections for the privacy of

Australians online’, Submission to Senate Standing Committee on Environment, Communications and the Arts, Australian Government, Canberra.

Privacy Rights Clearinghouse Website, 2012, ‘Fact Sheet 7: Workplace Privacy and Employee

Monitoring’,retrieved 09 January, 2013 .

Simmons, T., 2011, ‘The Ethics of Privacy on Facebook’, retrieved 09 January, 2013 <>.

Wallbridge, R., 2009, ‘How safe is Your Facebook Profile? Privacy issues of online social

networks’, ANU Undergraduate Research Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 85-92.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us