Essays on SHRM of Workforce Diversity and Work-Life Demands Literature review

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "SHRM of Workforce Diversity and Work-Life Demands" is an outstanding example of a management literature review. Armstrong (2000), views Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) as a proactive management process that links Human Resource Management (HRM) practices to the strategic goals and objectives of an organization so as to promote performance and increase the competitive advantage of an organization. Workforce diversity is an increasingly imperative aspect of human resource management. In HRM, workforce diversity is considered as a multifaceted factor that is defined as the visible and invisible differences between the various personnel within the organization.

The management of workforce diversity can have positive impacts on the organization in that it can lead to flexibility and innovation thus promoting the competitive advantage of the organization (Hartel & Fujimoto, 2010). On the other hand, poor management of workforce diversity can contribute to high turnover and decreased work satisfaction. The practice of developing and implementing HRM policies and practices with the aim of promoting the positive outcomes of work-force diversity is often referred to as diversity-oriented HRM. Diversity-oriented HRM can be incorporated into a number of HRM practices namely; training and development of the workforce and recruitment and selection.

These HRM practices in most cases provide convenient, balanced and fulfilling work life for the workforce this can, in turn, increase the competitive advantage of the organization (Hartel & Fujimoto, 2010). This paper seeks to provide an incisive review of contemporary research literature and theory. It will critically evaluate how SHRM of workforce diversity and work-life demands can impact the competitive advantage of an organization. Moreover, this paper will identify evidence that supports and challenge the existing views with regards to SHRM of workforce diversity and work-life demands.

In addition, this paper will identify the limitations and assumptions put across in research studies or views revolving around how SHRM of workforce diversity and work-life demands can impact the competitive advantage of an organization.

References

Armstrong, M. (2000). Strategic human resource management: a guide to action. UK: Kogan Page Publishers.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (1999).Australian Demographic Statistics, 3101.0, Canberra: ABS.

Blum, C., Fields, L., & Goodman, S. (1994). Organization-level determinants of

women in management. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 241–66.

Catalyst (2004). The bottom line: Connecting corporate performance and diversity. New York:

Catalyst.

Cox, T., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational

Competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45–56.

Gardenswartz, L., Rowe, A., Digh, D., & Bennett, F. (2003). The global diversity desk reference: Managing an international workforce. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Goodman, J., Fields, D., & Blum, T. (2003). “Cracks in the glass ceiling: In what kind

of organizations do women make it to the top?” Group & Organization Management,

28, 475–501.

Grant, Z. & Kleiner, H. (1997). Managing diversity in the workplace. Equal Opportunities International, 16, 3, pp.26-33.

Hart, A. (1997). Managing diversity for sustained competitiveness. New York: The Conference Board.

Hartel, C. & Fujimoto, Y. (2010). Human Resource Management.2nd ed. NSW: Pearson Australia.

Hewitt Associates. (2004). Preparing the workforce of tomorrow. Retrieved on

Retrieved February 10, 2005, from

Hubbard, E. (2004). The diversity scorecard: Evaluating the impact of diversity on organizational performance. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.

Judy, W. & D’Amico, C. (1997). “Workforce 2020: Work and workers in the 21st century”. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.

Levine, D., & Thomas, D. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance:

Report of a feasibility study of the diversity research network. Human Resource

Management, 42, 3–21.

Konrad, A.& Linnehan, F. (1995). Formalized human resource management structures:

Coordinating equal opportunity or concealing organizational practices. Academy of

Management Journal, 38, 787–820.

Matton, N. & Hernandez, M. (2004). A new study identifies the “makes and breaks” of diversity initiatives. Journal of Organizational Excellence, 23, 4, 47-58.

McDonald, D. (2003). Strategic Human Resource Management Approaches to work force diversity in Japan: Harnessing Corporate Culture for Organizational Competitiveness. Global Business Review, 4:1, 2003.

Milliken, J. & Martins, L. (1996).”Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, pp. 402–33.

Pelled, H., Eisenhardt, M. & Xin, R. (1999).”Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–2.

Reskin, B. & McBrier, D. (2000). “Why not ascription? Organizations’ employment of

male and female managers”. American Sociological Review, 65, 210–33.

Richard, O., Kochan, T., & McMillan-Capehart, A. (2002). “The impact of visible diversity

on organizational effectiveness: Disclosing the contents in Pandora’s black box”. Journal of Business and Management, 8, 1–26.

Richard, O. (2000). “Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource based

View”. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 164–77.

Rynes, S. & Rosen, B. (1995). “A field survey of factors affecting the adoption and perceived

success of diversity training”. Personnel Psychology, 48, 247–70.

Towers Perrin HR Services. (2004).”The coming talent crisis: Is your organization ready”? Retrieved March 21, 2011, from

Wilkinson, I. & Cheung, C. (1999). “Multicultural marketing in Australia: Synergy in diversity”’, Journal of International Marketing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 106–25

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us