The paper "Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict" Is a wonderful example of a Management Assignment. The problem with the liberal party in the early part of the 2000s was the fact that the party was dominated by two different people with different personalities and hence differing styles of leadership. One could identify Costello’ s leadership traits as being essentially based on the charisma of the man while that of John Howard was essentially based on the transformative nature of his leadership. The problem here was simple-with two differing leaders within the same party more often than not there would be the development of two different groups within the political party-this can also be understood in terms of the development of two warring factions within one party.
This would then essentially mean that the members of the team would work not just against the opposition but also against members of their own party, leading to a weakening of the group or the team itself. This would also strengthen the stand of the opposition. Some of the most basic factors of success where teamwork is concerned would be the existence of shared goals to accomplish, cohesive and knowledge-based furthering of one another’ s abilities along with mutual sharing of available resources (Harris, Hurst, Bago, and Biley, 2006).
The development of factions within political parties and the impact that faction development has on the overall efficiency of the party functioning have been studied in detail (Baer and Bositis, 1988). Most scholars seem to argue that as opposed to organizations factions in political parties further positive ends in as much as they retain opportunities to negotiate, transact, and compromise.
The issue in this case, however, was more than just a factor of negotiation, given the fact that Howard had lost the support of the cabinet, and Costello was being perceived as his heir apparent. The fact that he refused to step down was seen by many as a breach of trust, which means that in essence where Costello is concerned, Howard became a man who trampled ambitions to remain at the pinnacle of power. The fact of the matter remains that all evidence points to the deal made between Costello and Howard at the beginning of the first Howard reign in 1996.
The fact that Howard did not honor his promise of stepping down after a term and half, signifies a breach of trust within the team, especially given the fact that trust is a crucial element of effective leadership that can impact followers in ways ranging from the mundane to the exotic (Burke, et. Al., 2007). This would automatically lead to conflict within teams as manifested by Costello’ s behavior between 2003 and 2006, where he came out in open support of same-sex marriages and withdrew support from After a key election promise to extend the Medicare safety net.
It has to be understood that the erosion of trust was a natural course of being in the party given the fact that it is a positive expectation that another person will not through words, actions, or discussion act opportunistically (Nootenbloom, 2002). Positive expectation assumes knowledge and familiarity with the other person/party. This is based on experience and takes time to build. The fact that Howard refused to step down was in direct contrast with expectations and was, therefore, a surprise as opposed to the requisite of trust that slates knowledge as essential.
This comes from the history of interaction. It exists when the employee has adequate knowledge about someone and can predict the leader’ s behavior. Predictability enhances trust.
Conflict management and resolution. Retrieved April 17, 2010, http://www.doctorholmes.net/conflictmanagement.html
Lussier, R. N, and Achua, C. F, (2009). Leadership: Theory, Application, & Skill Development . CengageBrain. p 210
Wilson, G. L, and Hannah, M. S, (1993). Groups in context: leadership and participation in small groups. CengageBrain. p263
Hartcher, P, (2007). Bipolar nation: how to win the 2007 election. Black Inc. Pp2-3
DuBrin, A. J, (2007). Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills. Cengage Brain. Pp70-72
Barns, G. (2003). What’s wrong with the Liberal Party. Cambridge Press. Pp90-92
Huber, D, (2010). Leadership and nursing care management. Elsiever Health. pp90-92
West, M. A, (1994). Effective teamwork: practical lessons from organizational research. Wiley Books. pp84-87
Bennis, W. G., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper Row.
Kouzes, J. M, and Posner, B. Z, (2007). The leadership challenge. Wiley books. pp27-32
Nootenbloom, B., (2002). Trust: forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Barnes and Nobles. p36
Burke C S,. Sims D E,. Lazzara L E and Salas E, (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration’, The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6). pp606-632
Rundey, C. E, and Flanagan, T. A, (2010). Developing Your Conflict Competence: A Hands-On Guide for Leaders, Managers. Wiley Books. pp92-94
Erdem F, Ozen J and Atsan N, (2003). ‘The relationship between trust and team performance’. Journal of Work Study, 52(7). p338
Elcock, H. J, (2001). Political Leadership. Edward Elgar Publishing. p115