Essays on Culture Present in the Field of Organizational Behavior Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Culture Present in the Field of Organizational Behavior " is a perfect example of business coursework.   The workforce dynamics has changes a lot over the years which have resulted in major changes being witnessed in organizational behavior. A major change that is seen in the workforce environment relates to globalization, motivation, employees relations, values, and similar other topics which have changed with the passage of time. Various research and studies carried out in the direction of social culture highlights that the work habits are influenced by culture. This situation is called at “ cultural consequences” (Jacob, 2003, p. 3).

Apart from the work habits, there are various other factors like “ skills, knowledge and learned behavior” (Harris, 1998, p. 15) which has an influence on the social culture and brings a change in behavior. This is due to the fact that culture in the workplace has undergone a change with time. The paper looks into the various aspect of culture present in the field of organizational behavior and the changes that have to be done to accommodate it. The paper also presents the importance of culture for their success and the steps that the management needs to take to achieve it. Globalization is seen as one of the major factors which have revolved many cultures.

The world started to witness globalization during the 1990s when the world integrated as on the borders between countries disappeared. Different economies started to share different things like intellectual capital, goods, services etc. (Mcshane, 2008, p. 10) leading to a situation where trade between countries was considered essential for growth. Economies united and started to function as a single unit on matters which required amalgamation of knowledge.

This resulted in the creation of BPO’ s and KPO. This created a situation where the employees were not given the luxury of free time and had to work hard. This made the job monotonous and exerted heavy pressure on the employees leading to chronic health problems. This also changed the mindset of the employees and made them more money-oriented. The overall changes witnessed due to globalization made the workforce evolve so that the changes could be accommodated. In order to be successful culture is one of the most important things for organizations.

The management needs to ensure that culture is addressed in a proper way so that the organization benefits over a period of time. This is supported by research which states that; with decreasing customer base organisations have to ensure that customers stay back, and at the same time new customers become a part of it. (Considine 1995) This will help to identify the area that needs to be worked on. It will also help to evaluate areas where the organisation is lacking and will help to grow.

The magnitude of the problem multiplies due to an increase in workforce diversity. This makes it important that the management looks towards managing the workforce with greater efficiency. Research shows that employees come from different culture and caste and the manner of influencing them also differs. This makes it difficult for the management to identify a way to influence the entire workforce resulting in delayed decision making (Ralston, Hallinger, Egri & Naothinsuhk, 2005). This has made it difficult for the organization to ensure that the diversity in the workforce helps the organization to achieve best results.

References

Akande, W. 2002. The drawbacks of Cultural Globalization. Retrieved on October 6, 2011 from http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/162-general/27594.html

Aharoni, Y. 1996. The organisation of global service of MNC. International Studies of Management & Organisation, Volume 26

Cultural Dimension. 2010. Cultural Dimension: Hofstede. 12 Manage, The Executive Fast Track

Castells, M. 2001. Information Technology and global capitalization. On the edge, London

Ellis, V. 2001. Enterprise or exploitation: Can global business be a force for good. The New Statesman. Retrieved on October 6, 2011 from http://www.newstatesman.com/vernonellis.html

Enright, M. & Subramanian, V. 2008. An organising framework for MNC typologies. Business & Economics, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp. 137-149

Fukuyama, F. 2009. Economic Globalization & Culture. Retrieved on October 6, 2011 from http://www.oocities.org/rpallais/Fukuyama.htm

Gray, J. 1999. False Dawn: The delusion of Global capitalism. The New York Times Company

Harris, P.R 1998. The New Work Culture. USA: HRD Press.

Hofstede, G. 1991. Culture & Organization. Software of the mind, London, McGraw Hill

Innah, A. 2009. The effect of cultural factors in consumer buying behaviour. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34 (1), 34-56

Jacob, N 2003. Intercultural Management. Great Britain and USA: Kogan Page Ltd.

Kundu, S. & Merchant, H. 2008. Service Multinationals: The past, present and future. Business & Economics, Volume 48, Number 4, pp. 46-61

Lively, J., Powell, B., Claudia, G. & Carr, L. 2008. Inequity among inmates: applying equity theory to family. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Volume 25, page 87-115

Lopper, J. 2009. Personal Values and Beliefs in Career Success. Retrieved on October 5, 2011 from http://personaldevelopment.suite101.com/article.cfm/personal_values_and_beliefs_in_career_success

Mcshane 2008. Organizational Behavior. New York : TATA McGraw Hill

Muller, A. & Tudler, R. 2005. The search of synergy between institutions and multinationals. ERIM Report Series, Reference No ERS-2005-ORG

Ralston, D., Hallinger, P., Egri, C. & Naothinsuhk, S. 2005. The effects of culture on work place strategy of upward influence .University of Bangkok, Elsevier Inc. 2 (5). 35-47

Slawomir. 2010. Multinational sins pave the way to the expansion of domestic companies. Emerald Group Publishing limited, Volume 11, number 1, page 13-19

Wright & Pandey. 2010. Transformational Leadership in the public sector: Does structure matter. Journal of Public Administration & Theory, Oxford University Press, Volume 20, Issue 1, page 75-89

Wasserstorm, J. 2003. A Mickey Mouse Approach to Globalization. Retrieved on October 6, 2011 from http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/162/27612.html

Zeller, C. 2000. Rescaling power relation in a globalising industry. Environment and Planning, Volume 32, Issue 9, page 1545-1567

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us