Essays on Effective Project Management with PRojects IN Controlled Environments Assignment

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Effective Project Management with PRojects IN Controlled Environments” is an engrossing example of the assignment on management. PRINCE2 is a well know project management tool which is an acronym for (PRojects IN Controlled Environments, version 2). PRINCE2 project management methodology is widely utilized due to its efficacy in the development and implementation of projects. PRINCE2 is a process-driven methodology that is mainly deployed within controlled environments with seven key core principles, seven themes, and the seven processes. The utilization of PRINCE2 is only meant for high-level management functions and the seven main procedures for PRINCE2 within a project are; Project start: starting a project is the initial stage within PRINCE2 whereby the project team and brief are prepared.

This stage is where the overall project is discussed by the project sponsors and project stakeholders while a project board to overlook the project is selected (Bentley 2010). The main activities within this stage include the selection of the project team and manager, definition of a project approach, consultations, and planning the next phase of the project. At this stage, all the major stakeholders are identified at this stage and identification of the logs of previous projects (Dwyer 2013). Initiating a Project (IP): This is a follow up of the initial process and it leads to the refinement of the ideas or project brief into a concrete project plan which will be used in the project implementation.

This phase is characterized by project planning, project quality, setting up of controls within the project, assessment of project risks, and it is a build-up of the initial project phase (Dinsmore 2011). The final deliverable of this phase is the Project Initiation Documentation which outlines all the procedures to be implemented and undertaken within this phase.

It is also a stage whereby all the project key stakeholders are identified (Harris 2010). Directing a Project (DP): This stage outlines the roles which the project board and other stakeholders will in controlling the project. The project board can make sure that the initiation stage is authorized and implemented in a proper manner.

References

Bentley, C 2010, PRINCE2: A Practical Handbook, John Wiley and Sons, Boston.

Calvert, S 2011, 'Managing stakeholders', in JR Turner (ed.), The commercial project manager: managing owners, sponsors, partners, supporters, stakeholders, contractors and consultants, McGraw-Hill, London, pp. 214-222.

Cleland, DI 2009, 'Stakeholder management', in JK Pinto (ed.), The project management institute: Project management handbook, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, pp. 55-72.

Didraga, J Otniel, B & Nicolae, G 2012, “Study on Risk Approaches in Construction Projects”, Informatica Economica, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 79-86.

Dinsmore, P & Cabanis-Brewin, J 2011, The AMA Handbook of Project Management, American Management Association, New York.

Dwyer, J Liang, Z Thiessen, V & Martini, 2013, A Project Management in Construction & Engineering Management: Getting Good Ideas to Work, Allen & Unwin, Chicago.

Furman, J 2011, The Project Management Answer Book, Management Concepts Press New York.

Gardiner, PD 2010, Project management: a strategic planning approach, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

Gray, CF & Larson, EW 2009, Project management : the managerial process, 2 edn, McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, USA.

Harris, P 2010, PRINCE2 2009: Planning and Control Using Microsoft Projects, McGraw Hill Publishers, London.

Harrison, F and Lock, D 2004, Advanced Project Management: A Structured Approach, Jones & Bartlett Learning, San Francisco.

Heldman, K 2009, PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Kloppenborg, T 2014, Contemporary Project Management. Cengage Learning, New York.

McDowell, SW 2009, ‘Just-in-time project management’, Industrial Engineer: IE, vol. 33, pp. 30-33, EBSCOhost, Business Source Complete.

Meredith, J and Mantel, S 2011, Project Management: A Managerial Approach, John Wiley and Sons, Boston.

Nagarajan, K 2004, Project Management, New Age International, New Jersey.

Neale, CW 2012, ‘Post Completion audits: Avoiding the pitfalls’, Managerial Auditing Journal, vol. 10, pp. 17-24.

Peter, G & Langley, D 2011, “Application of Standard Project Management Tools to Research-A Case Study from an Engineering Project”, Journal of Research Administration, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 112-119.

Thamhain, H 2008, 'Team building', in JK Pinto (ed.), The project management institute: Project management handbook, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, pp. 267, 270-278.

Wall, J and Callister R 2007, ‘Conflict and its management’, Journal of Management, Vol. 14, pp 515-558.

Wysocki, RK, Beck, R, & Crane, DB 2009, Effective project management: How to plan, manage, and deliver projects on time and within budget, 2nd edn, Wiley, New York, New York, pp. 237, 239-262.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us