Induction Introduction Induction is sourcing from facts and occurrences that channel to progress of a general judgment. Even though the facts used to make conclusion are expectedly true, the conclusion established may be erroneous1. An example of induction is that most Americans go for vacations on winter seasons. Therefore, we can generalize that all Britons attends holiday during the winter period. Knowledge of causation states that for a particular phenomenon to occur under specific conditions there must be another thing that leads to it. Knowledge of causation is helpful in the anticipation of regularity in that one can determine the results of a certain issue following prior experience.
Intentions of particular causes include logical and causal relations. Therefore, it is possible for one to decide when anticipating regularity on whether to end or commence to hold on an idea (Bernecker & Dretske, 2000). Hume disagrees with idea induction and causation. In causation, he critique that though one issue leads to another it’s also possible that one issue does not lead to another. Hume reviewed that the reasoning in induction is circular and do not have a foundation.
He justified this in two ways. First, he argued that logic could not assure our inductions. The other justification is that an individual can only assume that experience about something is likely to remain repeated. Hume permits the use of induction and causation on daily experiences if only one recognizes the constraints of their knowledge. In conclusion, Hume’s argument about the causal theory and induction relied on his skepticism and casual necessity. It is exhibited by the fact that he did support neither the induction reasoning nor the knowledge of causation.
Reference list Curnow, T., Introducing Philosophy for Everyday Life: A Practical Guide, London, Icon, 2012.