The paper "Expenditure in Research and Development, Open Innovation" is a perfect example of management coursework. The development of new ideas for both processes and products needs watchful efforts to innovate. Scientific progress was not as much structured during the nineteenth century and it has naturally risen from the developed ideas in the diverse areas of organisations. Moreover, the 21st century has experienced an increase in the emphasis placed on the facilities of formal research and development (R& D) as a source of innovation while the sources of ideas still flow from diverse quarters.
The pursuit of scientific knowledge and its applications to problem productions have been epitomised by popular research laboratories such as Dupont, AT& T, IBM, and General Electric. As much as we recognise that science has significantly contributed to the early industrial revolution in the United Kingdom, the modern corporate enterprise has also harnessed technology and science in the 21st century in a more extensive fashion within its organisational bounds. For the sake of economic well-being, systematic management rules are applied to practise scientific knowledge (Damanpour & Wischnevsky 2006). The innovation management process is equally critical, and present with its main challenges, and makes it a common challenge across many organisations.
Methodologies vary depending on the aspects of R& D emphasised, size, and to some extent personal management styles of organisational managers. Businesses that conduct research in the private sectors such as the pharmaceutical companies also devote important resources to developmental and applied for work. Numerous firms may not be familiar with development demands. Nonetheless, to be successful, the organisational ventures should effectively manage and blend both basic R& D with the strategic view to commercialisation either as part of innovation collaboration or more like as independently, such as cluster or network (Tidd, Bessant & Pavitt 2009). The management of external collaborations that plays a major role in the R& D process is the critical aspect of the innovation management process for organisations in a vastly connected networked industry.
This essay will be examining the significance of R& D in innovating organisations since it is being viewed as playing a major role in the innovative process. Open innovation Many organisations have now largely appreciated that in the current first-evolving business environment, there will always be an existence of ideas and more competitions outside the walls irrespective of the expertise and size the organisation have.
Markets are normally capable than individual organizations at relentlessly destroying and creating prospective innovations (Shavinina 2003). Hence, an organisation’ s innovative ecosystem presents the possibilities of enlarging and diversifying its innovation opportunities sources. Furthermore, the new development of technologies and market capabilities that are not available within organisations are often required by innovation. An organisation’ s innovation ecosystem hence consequently offers the prospects of outsourcing part of the innovation management and also accesses the best-in-class operators (Panayides 2006). Consequently, the entire progression of transforming a prospective opportunity or an idea into a profitable business needs various capabilities and skills at diverse stages within a considerable time frame.
This can as well be between a period of five to ten year period of going from a business notion on paper to beneficial and sizable business activity. Firms can thus focus on specific development segments instead of endeavouring to do everything for themselves (Sampson 2007). For instance, large firms scale the ideas up while the small organisations develop them (Fricke & Totterdill 2004).
This, in turn, insinuates that open innovation is all out the development of in-house prospects which have already been instigated outside, but at the same time equally about developing outside the organisation, other prospects have been commenced in-house (Andreas & Brettel 2012). This can be achieved through spin-offs or through licensing. These kinds of outsourcing are capable of eliminating or reducing distribution or production risks and costs and also propelling the project to target new applications and reaching larger markets.
Licensing can be utilised while trying to gain access to the corresponding technology or endeavouring to institute industry standards. Various Strategic and tactical benefits can be gained from open innovation.
Alwis, RS & Hartmann, E 2008, ‘The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: knowledge management in innovative enterprises’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.12, No. 1, pp. 133-147.
Andreas, E & Brettel, M 2012, ‘A Coalitional Perspective on the Role of the R&D Department within the Organization’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 489-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00919.x.
Argyres, NS & Silverman, BS 2004, ‘R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 8-9, pp. 929-958. doi: 10.1002/smj.387.
Argyres, NS, & Silverman, BS 2004, ‘R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 8-9, pp. 929-958.
Bain, PG., Mann, L & Pirola-Merlo, A 2001, ‘The Innovation Imperative: The Relationships Between Team Climate, Innovation, and Performance in Research and Development Teams’, Small Group Research, Vol. 32, No.1, pp. 55-73.
Baldwin, JR & Hanel, P 2003, Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy: Canadian Industry and International Implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, W & Dietz, J 2004, ‘R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms - Evidence for the German manufacturing industry’, Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 209-223.
Berchicci, L 2013, ‘Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance’, Research Policy, Vol. 42, No.1, pp.117-127.
Cassiman, B & Veugelers, R 2006, ‘In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition’, Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 68-82.
Chen, et al., 2013 ‘Teams as innovative systems: multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams’, The Journal of applied psychology, Vol. 98, No. 6, pp. 1018-27. doi: 10.1037/a0032663.
Chiesa, V & Frattini, F 2009, Evaluation and Performance Measurement of Research and Development: Techniques and perspectives for Multi-level Analysis. Northampton: Edgar Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Damanpour, D & Wischnevsky, JD 2006, ‘Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations’, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 269-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.08.002.
Fan, Q et al., (eds) 2009 Innovation for Development and the Role of Government: A Perspective from the East Asia and Pacific Region. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Fichter, K 2009, ‘Innovation communities: the role of networks of promoters in Open Innovation’, R&D Management, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 357-371.
Fricke W & Totterdill, P (eds) 2004, Action Research in Workplace Innovation and Regional Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Fulford, H (eds) 2013, Case Studies in Innovation: For Researchers, Teachers and Students. London: Academic Conference Limited.
Godoe, H 2000, ‘Innovation regimes, R&D and radical innovations in telecommunications’, Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 9, pp. 1033-1046.
Goffin, K & Mitchell, R 2010, Innovation Management: Strategy and Implementation using the Pentathlon Framework, (2nd Edition). United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hine, D & Kapeleris, J 2006, Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Biotechnology, an International perspective: Concepts, theories and Cases. Northampton: Edgar Elgar Publishing, Inc.
Hsuan, MJ 2001, ‘Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management’, Technovation, Vol. 21, No.7, pp. 423-435.
Jain, R., Triandis, HC & Weick, CW 2010, Managing Research, Development and Innovation: Managing the Unmanageable. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Jain, RK & Trandis, HC 1997, Management of Research and Development Organizations: Managing the Unmanageable (2nd edn). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Laursen, K & Salter, A 2006, ‘Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms’, Strategic management journal, Vol. 27, pp.131-150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507.
Lawson, B & Samson, D 2001, ‘Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach’, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 377-400.
Lichtenthaler, U 2011, ‘Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions’, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 75-93.
Molle, W & Djarova, J (eds) 2009 Enhancing the Effectiveness of Innovation: New Roles for Key Players. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
OECD 2002a, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2002. Paris, France: OECD Publication Service.
OECD 2009c, Educational Research and Innovation: Working Out Change Systemic Innovation in Vocational Education and Training. United Kingdom: OECD Publication Service.
OECD 2010b OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship Poland: Key Issues and Policies. United Kingdom: OECD Publication Service.
Panayides, P 2006, ‘Enhancing innovation capability through relationship management and implications for performance’, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 466-483.
Paulsen, N & Callan, NJ 2013, ‘Transformational leadership and innovation in an R&D organization experiencing major change’, Organizational Change, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 595-610
Paulsen, N et al. 2009 ‘Charismatic leadership, change and innovation in an R&D organization’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 22, No. 5, No. 511-523. doi: 10.1108/09534810910983479.
Pearce, CL & Ensley, MD 2004, ‘A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: the central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs)’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 259-278.
Sampson, C 2007, ‘R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 364-386.
Schroll, A & Mild, A 2011, ‘Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D: An empirical study on open innovation adoption in Europe’, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 475-495.
Schroll, A & Mild, A 2011, Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D: An empirical study on open innovation adoption in Europe’, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 475-495.
Shavinina, LV (eds) 2003, The International Handbook on Innovation, United Kingdom: Oxford.
Steen, H et al. (eds) 2012, Employee-Driven Innovation: A New Approach. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Tidd J Bessant J & Pavitt K 2009, Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change, (4rd Edition). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Verganti, R 2008, ‘Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: A Meta-model and a Research Agenda ’, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 436-456.
Youtie, J & Shapira, P 2008, ‘Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development’, Research Policy, Vol. 37, No.8, pp. 1188-1204.
Yuan, F & Woodman, RW 2010, ‘Innovative Behaviour in the Workplace: The Role of Performance And Image Outcome Expectations’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 323-342. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.49388995.