Essays on International Rules on Intellectual Property Rights and the Right to Food Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "International Rules on Intellectual Property Rights and the Right to Food" Is a wonderful example of a Macro and Microeconomics Case Study. Hunger is an insightful outrage to human decorum and human rights. It is the basic limits to developments, crime rate as well as the conflict between individuals, and reduction in life span. At the World food summit in Rome 1996, was reported that more than 800 million individual specifically in the developing nations does not have sufficient food. Food security is considered as a physical as well as economical access of every person at all times to enough quality, safe, and nutritious food.

The Rome assertion that was issued by the summit promised to reduce the number of hungry people by 50% by the year ending 2015. The Paris conference of the right of industrial property was foreseen as an area of the project with regards to propriety right being secured. Hence, article 1(3) of the c1883 conference provides a declaration that Industrial property will be entailed in the wide reality as well as will be applicable not just to the industry but to commerce goods and to wine and spirit produced.

Furthermore, there is a growing awareness that some rights like the right to food and health are at risk due to the implementation of global trade commitment. T his association is anticipated to forge close as the global system of trade develops as well as the comprehension of human rights impacts is more comprehensive. The right to food focuses on the manner to which food is supplied as well as accede. Global trade policies might restrict and increases the presence of food distribution.

The right has been read to entail the commitments on the nations to guarantee that their rules guarantee the accessibility of both local and internal nations. What is required is more assessment on the manner to which the trade policies affect the right to food in order to ensure that traded concession might be up to date. The agreement on agriculture controls the importation and exportation of groceries and agricultural foodstuffs. Righto food is the current human right concern to be discussed by WTO (Drache, 2014).

The probability of effects of executing the WTO Agreement on food supply, standard, and access to food as well as the nutritional worth will turn to be more distinct since liberalizations will depict some positive results as the price will declines as well as market accessibility broadening. Nevertheless, there are other offset matters that will emerge, specifically devoid of the capacity of developing countries to makes use of Agreement on Agriculture safety. The integration of the right to food idiom to WTO Agreement might provide some positive safety mechanism, providing improved incorporations of human rights matters into the WTO verdicts makings.

It might as well as determine objectives to be released for nations when negotiation and implementations of global trade policies are ongoing (Ewing, 2016). Theoretical underpinnings right to food The use of trade permits to persuade human rights adherence has been criticized since it fails to raise the human rights standard as well as subjecting sectors of the populace into more poverty. This might be a threat to the freedom of some rights such as the right to food.

Furthermore, the permit is comprehensive as well as removes from a tailored appraisal devised to tackle some rights infringement. The human rights circumstance might not be enhanced and thus an individual who places reliance on such trade will be at risk, in this regard, it might be unsuitable to introduce human rights laws that depict some restrictions on binding impact to the WTO which is strong enforcement. Another approach of persuading adherence by way of technical support as well, as ability building might be ideal. A further apprehension is mislaid of human rights in the sphere of WTO, Specifically, WTO heated debate resolution process (Gail, 2012).


Chen, Y. (2014) Trade, Food Security, and Human Rights: The Rules for International, london.

Drache, D. (2014) Linking Global Trade and Human Rights: New Policy Space in Hard , new york.

Ewing, M. (2016) International Trade and Food Security: Exploring Collective Food, New York.

Gail, R. (2012) The Challenge of Food Security: International Policy and Regulatory, london.

Howse, R. (2007) The WTO System: Law, Politics & Legitimacy - Page 205, london.

Lang, A. (2011) World Trade Law After Neoliberalism: Reimagining the Global Economic , new york.

Naylor, R. (2014) The Evolving Sphere of Food Security, london.

Plummer, ‎. (2007) The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis, new york.

Ringler, C. (2010) Global Change: Impacts on Water and food Security, new York.

Schmitz, ‎. (2015) Food Security in an Uncertain World: An International Perspective, new york.

Stevens, C. (2000) The WTO Agreement on Agriculture and Food Security - Page 1, london.

Weisfelt, ‎. (2012) The Challenge of Food Security: International Policy and Regulatory, new york.

william, N. (2005) World Trade Organisations and Food Security - Page 132, london.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us