Essays on Introducing a New Performance Management System Literature review

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Introducing a New Performance Management System" is an outstanding example of a management literature review. In the 21st century, change is rapidly taking place. As the change takes place, management theorists have proposed new theories to improve management (Ohemeng & Owusu 2011, p. 17). While some theories have been implemented successfully some have received severe resentment from employees and even managers. One of the issues which have gained much resistance the type of remuneration offered by organizations, particularly performance-related pay (Folz, Abdelrazek & Chung 2009, p. 63). In one of the studies in a large, it was established that this form of payment method had caused resistance from employees and line managers due to less familiarity and understanding of the new system.

Also, the objectives of the system were not clearly set while others thought the grading system was not fair. Therefore, this report will critically evaluate problems in the areas of performance management, rewards, involvement and participation, equality, and development and talent management which required to be tackled when reforming the performance management system. Also, this report will explain and justify how the system would better be changed and re-launched. 2.0 Background This case study involves a large company which has over the years has embraced the unitarist culture.

In a nutshell, employees belong to a group and have been remunerated through the standard payment method. However, the management has recently adopted performance-related pay which basically was top be done based on the competency of the employees. This system created a grading system of (A– E), with each grade is linked to performance. For instance, (A) represents the highest performance hence heist payment.

The system was devised and introduced very quickly by the use of an external consulting firm. After two years of adoption, high levels of discontent from staff and some line managers who complained about their role within the system and flaws in the system. Research held that the effectiveness of a performance-related pay system is dependent on an understanding of the system and objectives, level of commitment, employees’ participation, reviewing, collaboration and motivation.

References

Antoinette, W, Rost, K & Osterloh, M 2009, Pay for Performance in the Public Sector—

Benefits and (Hidden) Costs, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 387-412.

Boyne, G.A & Chen, A.A 2006, Performance targets and public service improvement, Journal

of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 17, No.3, pp.455-77

Brief, AP, & Weiss, HM 2002, Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual

Review of Psychology, Vol. 53, pp. 279–323

Burnes, B 2014, Understanding Resistance to Change – Building on Coch and French, Journal of

Change Management, pp.2-25

Cappelli, P 2008, Talent Management for the Twenty – First Century, Harvard Business Review.

Carroll, A.E 2014, The New Health Care: The Problem With 'Pay for Performance' in

Medicine, New York Times.

Dyer, K 2010, Communicating through difficult change at British Airways, Strategic

Communication Management, Vol.14, No.3, pp.28-31

Folz, D, Abdelrazek, R & Chung, Y 2009, The adoption, use and impacts of performance

measures in medium-size cities: progress toward performance management, Public

Performance & Management Review, Vol. 33, No.1, pp.63-87

Fryer, K, Antony, J & Ogden, S, 2009, Performance management in the public sector,

International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 22, No.6, pp.478 – 498

Ga, J. S 2007, The reward and incentive system of SAMSUNG, The monthly Rodong bubryul.

Graetz, F & Smith, A.C.T 2010, Managing Organizational Change: A Philosophies of Change

Approach, Journal of Change Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp.135–154.

Irlenbusch, B & Ruchala, G.K 2008, Relative Rewards within Team-Based Compensation,

Labour Economics, Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 141-167.

James, P, Engbergs, T.A & Jun, S.Y 2009, Back to the Future? Performance-Related Pay,

Empirical Research, and the Perils of Persistence, Theory to Practice, p.47.

Kristensen, S.R, Meacock, R , Turner, A.J, Boaden, R,McDonald, R, Roland, R & Sutton, M

2014, Long-Term Effect of Hospital Pay for Performance on Mortality in England, The

New England Journal of Medicine Vol.371, No.6, pp. 540–548.

Latham, G, Borgogni, L & Petitta, L 2008, Goal setting and performance management in the

public sector, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 11, No.4, pp.385-403

Lagace, M 2003, Pay-for-Performance Doesn’t Always Pay Off, Harvard Business School

Lewis, R.E & Heckman, R.J 2006, Talent management: a critical review, Human Resources

Management Review, Vol. 16, pp. 139-54.

Losey, S 2010, DoD ends pay-for-performance system for most Intel workers, FederalTimes.com

Marsden, D 2004, Value for Money, Center Peace Spring, pp.15-19.

McKinsey & Company 2008, Creating organizational transformations, The McKinsey Quarterly,

pp.1–8.

McPhie, N.A.G & Sapin, B.J 2006, Designing an Effective Pay for Performance Compensation

System, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.

Năstase, M, Giuclea, Graetz, F & Smith, A.C.T 2010, Managing Organizational Change: A

Philosophies of Change Approach, Journal of Change Management, Vol. 10, No. 2,

pp.135–154.

Nastase, M 2012, The Impact of Change Management in Organizations – a Survey of Methods

and Techniques for a Successful Change, Review of International

Comparative Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 5-16.

Ohemeng, F.L.K & Owusu, F 2011, Developing and implementing an effective performance-

based management system in Ghana: one step forward, two steps back? paper presented at

the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the International Research Society of Public Management,

vol. 13, No.3 , pp.11-45.

Robertson, IT, Birch, AJ & Cooper, CL 2012, Job and work attitudes, engagement and employee

performance: Where does psychological well-being fit in? Leadership & Organization

Development Journal, vol.33, pp.224-232.

Rogers, P, Meehan, P & Tanner, S 2006, Building a winning culture, Boston, MA, Bain

Scott, B & Revis, S 2008, Talent management in hospitality: graduate career success and

strategies, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 20, pp.

781-791.

Sharma R 2007, Change Management - Concepts and Applications, Tata McGraw-Hill

Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi.

Solmon, L.C & Podgursky n.d, Pros and cons of performance based pay, Milken Family

Foundation.

Stoltzfus, K, Stohl, C, & Seibold, D.R 2011, Managing organizational change: paradoxical

problems, solutions, and consequences, Journal of organizational change management,

Vol.24, pp.3-23.

U.S. General Accounting Office 2004, Implementing Pay for Performance at Selected Personnel

Demonstration Projects, GAO–04–83, Washington, DC, January 23.

Van Vugt, M & Schaller, M 2008, Evolutionary approaches to group dynamics: An

introduction. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice vol. 12, pp. 1-9

Wayne, S. J, Shore, L. M, Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E 2002, The role of fair treatment and

rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader-member exchange, Journal of

Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No.3, 590-598.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us