Essays on Understanding Self as Key to Good Management Personal Statement

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Understanding Self as Key to Good Management” is an excellent variant of the personal statement on management. Managers have a major role in overseeing other people's work to ensure that the organization's goals are accomplished. As the work environment changes, previous non-management jobs have been required to perform management activities. This requires one to coordinate activities done by others with an aim of ensuring that they are completed in an efficient and effective manner. A manager is expected to have skills that will enable them to carry out their tasks effectively (Yukl, 2010).

Being able to understand oneself is a vital aspect of developing good management skills. One is able to analyze their strengths and weakness and work on their weakness. The process of self-assessment also helps in managing change, coping with distress, managing one’ s emotions. Through understanding oneself, it becomes possible to unlock key human qualities which include; leadership, motivation, and empathy (Gold, Thorpe & Mumford, 2010). This report will conduct a critical analysis of four self-assessment activities that I have conducted. The activities are; organization structure and design, motivating employees, understanding groups and teams, and leadership.

It will then state my score in each activity, analyze the finding, determine my strengths and weakness, and come up with an action plan. Organization structure and designA brief review of assessment findingsMy self-assessment score in this area is 62. This implies that I prefer working in a mechanistic structure where there is extensive departmentalization, high formalization, limited information network, and centralization. This score implies that I may find problems in finding an organization that matches my expectations. Most of the organizations are moving towards organic structure and very few organizations are mechanistic. Critical analysis of the findingsMy results show that I prefer a mechanistic structure of the organisation.

Mechanistic and organic structures act as two different types of structure possibilities.

References

Adams, M. J 2005, Teamwork. Columbus, Ohio: SRA/McGraw-Hill

Baldoni, J 2012, Great Motivation Secrets of Great Leaders. New York: McGraw Hill.

Bass, B 2010, The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Brown, M. E. & Treviño, L. K. 2006, “Ethical leadership: A review and future directions”. Leadership Quarterly, Vol.17, no.2, pp. 595-616.

Cole, L. 2010, A handbook on transformational teamwork: Putting the work in teamwork to work. Conway, AR: TeamMax.

Doyle, S.2004, The Manager's Guide to Motivating Employees. Amherst: HRD.

Etzioni-Halevy, E 2010, Bureaucracy and democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.

Gold, J., Thorpe, R & Mumford, A 2010, Gower handbook of leadership and management development, Burlington, VT: Gower.

Katz, J. H & Miller, F. A 2013, Opening doors to teamwork and collaboration: 4 keys that change everything. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Lapidot, Y., Kark, R & Shamir, B 2007, “The impact of situational vulnerability on the development and erosion of followers' trust in their leader”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.18, no.1, pp.16-34.

Six, F. E., De Bakker, F & Huberts, L 2007, “Judging a corporate leader's integrity: An illustrated three component model”, European Management Journal, Vol. 25,no.2, pp.185-194.

Yukl, G. 2010, Leadership in organizations (7th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us