The paper “ Pros and Cons of Taylorism as Scientific Management” is a perfect variant of the essay on management. Also known as scientific management was named after its inventor Fredrick Winslow Taylor. The theory aimed at improving economic efficiency with regard to labor productivity and analyzed and synthesized workflows. Therefore, this was a production efficiency methodology that emphasized on breaking each task, job, or action into smaller but simpler segments that are easy to analyze and teach. Introduced at the beginning of the 20th century, Taylorism had a number of aims which included achievement of maximum job fragmentation aimed at minimizing skill requirements as well as learning time, separation of work execution from work planning, separation of direct labor from indirect labor, replacement of thumb productivity estimates with exact measurements, introduction of time and motion studies for optimization of work performance, tool and work station design as well as cost accounting and enabling payment through result method of wage determination (Dawson, 2005).
Taylorism had laid down principles of industrial manufacturing through assembly-line factories. The method had the emphasis of maximum output from the worker and the machine and hence maximized profits for the benefit of both management and workers.
Despite the fact that Taylorism has contributed a lot in the modern-day working organization theories, it has various shortcomings that make it undesirable for application in the modern industry. This paper critically analyses Taylorism in terms of both its strengths and weaknesses in an attempt to show that it is unrealistic and that it can not be successfully applied in the modern-day organization. CritiqueWhy Taylorism? It is no doubt that the desire to control workers has been at the heart of the management for a long time- since industrial revolution times.
As such, the management has been working out strategies aimed at enabling them to evaluate, direct, and supervise the work process. Taylorism was hence developed with the aim of putting the work process firmly in the management’ s hands.
Dawson, M 2005, The consumer trap, University of Illinois press, Urbana.
Head, S 2007, Work and power in the modern age, Oxford University press, Oxford.
Hartness, J2010, Scientific management, Columbia university press, New York.
Carl, M 2011, Management, Macmillan, New York.