The paper "Is Establishing Team Work Difficult In Organisations? " is a great example of management coursework. The difficulties that do face the team-building process are explored in this paper where different organizational situations are considered. Concepts and theories that can assist in explaining the difficulties that are likely to face teams in organizations are discussed. The theories are analyzed while conserving how they affect the behavior of the team members to demonstrate the possible changes that the management can face in the process of developing a team. Also, different works of literature have been reviewed in the process of gaining more knowledge concerning the team building and practices of the management that do affect the behavior of members of a team. Introduction Teamwork building can be faced by numerous challenges that do affect the behavior of the team members.
For instance, the organizational challenges that can pose difficulties in the process of building a team are cultural diversity. Many organizations are facing challenges in managing their diverse workforce due to the differences that do exist among the employees. The differences are associated with different cultural orientation, experiences, and values that might affect the way the employees do interact in the organization (Martin, 2003).
For instance, Walmart is among the many organizations that have been facing a diverse workforce where the employees come from diverse backgrounds. Managing the differences that do exist among the employees is crucial in ensuring that the employees can interact hence creating good working relations. Good relations are considered crucial in the process of developing a team as the employees need to be able to interact well to guarantee efficient and effective team.
According to scientific management theory, it is crucial to ensure good relations among the employees to ensure that there is an effective team. An effective team is crucial in ensuring the success of an organization as employees can work as a team effectively can easily be in a position to be committed to achieving the set goals. The effectiveness of a team can be realized by ensuring that attitudes of the employees towards the differences that might exist among themselves is positive (Cannon, Salas, and Converse, 2003).
Failing to have a positive attitude for the differences can be challenging in the process of developing a team. The way an organization manages the differences that do exists among the employees is crucial in determining the relations existing among employees hence determining the team-building process. Difficulties facing teamwork Aspects related to globalization can be held responsible for challenges that have been facing the team-building process. Many employees from diverse cultures are being brought together in an organization where the way they interact does affect the team-building process. For instance, globalization has enhanced communications systems where employees from different countries can find themselves working in the same organization.
The way the management of the organization manages the diverse experience and beliefs of the employees determine the effectiveness of the team (McDonough, et al. 2001). Therefore, the management is responsible for ensuring that the differences are managed to improve the relations among n the employees hence assisting in boosting the relationship among the employees.
Bligh, M.C., Pearce, C.L. and Kohles, J.C., 2006. The importance of self-and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso-level model of leadership dynamics. Journal of managerial Psychology, 21(4), pp.296-318.
Burgoon, L. Stern, and L. Dillman, 2001. Interpersonal Adaptation: Dyadic Interaction Patterns. Cambridge University Press.
Burstein and D. Diller, 2004. A framework for dynamic information flow in mixed initiative human/agent organizations. Applied Intelligence, 20(3).
Cannon, E. Salas, and S. Converse, 2003. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In J. Castellan, editor, Individual and group decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chen and K. Sycara, 2008. Webmate: a personal agent for browsing and searching. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents.
Christoffersen and D. Woods, 2004. How to make automated systems team players. Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research.
Ellis, A. and Phelps, R., 2000. Staff development for online delivery: A collaborative, team based action learning model. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), pp.26-44.
Entin and D. Serfaty, 2000. Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41,
Fan and J. Yen, 2004. Modeling and simulating human teamwork behaviors using intelligent agents. J. of Physics of Life Reviews, 1(3).
Kliem, R., 2004. Managing the risks of offshore IT development projects.Information Systems Management, 21(3), pp.22-27.
Langan‐Fox, J., Anglim, J. and Wilson, J.R., 2004. Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 14(4), pp.331-352.
Layman, L., Williams, L., Damian, D. and Bures, H., 2006. Essential communication practices for Extreme Programming in a global software development team. Information and software technology, 48(9), pp.781-794.
Martin, R.C., 2003. Agile software development: principles, patterns, and practices. Prentice Hall PTR.
McDonough, E.F., Kahnb, K.B. and Barczaka, G., 2001. An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams.Journal of product innovation management, 18(2), pp.110-120.
Mohrman, S.A., Cohen, S.G. and Morhman Jr, A.M., 2005. Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. Jossey-Bass.