The paper "One Best Way to Manage " is a good example of business coursework. There have been varied arguments, discussions, and debates regarding the question of whether there is one best way of managing an organization. Whereas many people believe that there is one best way of managing an organization, quite a good number of scholars believe that the concept is classical and that it was only applicable in the ancient times, the times of Max Webber and Fredrick Taylor. These two theorists believed that an organization can be managed by only one way if structures are bureaucratic and that there is a corporation between management and the employees (van der Voet, 2014).
However, in the modern business world, there is no one best way of managing an organization due to the nature of the business environment. The business environment is turning out to be competitive and experiencing a high degree of dynamism. The change in the business environment, ranging from technological to social and political impact on the effectiveness and as well as organizational structures. In fact, according to the view of contingency theory, stabilization of the business environment encourages standardization, specialization, and formalization, which contributes to the improvement of organizational efficiency (Madanipour, 2010).
Undertaking environmental analysis to obtain certainty and predictability paves way for adoption and implementation of policies that ensure effective execution of operations, hence providing solutions to business problems. Similarly, forms of instability in the business environment necessitate the establishment of organic structures in the organization which leads to decentralization in order to attain flexibility and adaptability. This essay, therefore, aims at arguing out whether there is one best way of managing an organization or not. One best way to manage People tend to believe that there is “ one best way” of managing or rather leading people.
This notion, I would say, is classical and way far from modernization (Timiyo, 2014). The reason as to why people view the management aspect of employees or people being easy is because they view an organization as being affected by the only factor. However, this is not the case because operations in the business environment are affected by a number of factors, ranging from internal, which are within the control of an organization, to external factors, factors which are said to be beyond the control of an organization (van der Voet, 2014).
Believing that there is one best way of managing an organization is risky, leave alone the fact that it comes with negative consequences should the organization adopt this management point of view. Adopting this management point of view will deter the organization from considering factors affecting the performance of the organization, often, from both the internal and external environments. Organization structure One proponent of this concept was Max Webber, who advocated for the bureaucratic theory of management.
Bureaucratic management refers to an organizational system whose basis is on clearly identified levels of management and roles in order to achieve high levels of efficiency and effectiveness. According to him, organizations are subdivided into hierarchies’ in order to develop high levels of effectiveness and efficiency (Latfullin, 2016). In fact, Max Weber made a suggestion that organizations should establish procedures for performing their tasks. According to Webber, bureaucracy is a form of administrative and organizational structure, whose development is made through rational-legal authority (Latfullin, 2016).
Bull, J.W., Jobstvogt, N., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Mascarenhas, A., Sitas, N., Baulcomb, C., Lambini, C.K., Rawlins, M., Baral, H., Zähringer, J., Carter-Silk, E., Balzan, M.V., Kenter, J.O., Häyhä, T., Petz, K. and Koss, R. 2016, ‘Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework’, Ecosystem Services, 17, pp. 99–111.
Gupta, A 2013, ‘Environmental and pest analysis: An approach to external business environment’, Merit Research Journal of Art, Social Science and Humanities, 1(2), pp. 13–17.
Huang, K.-F., Dyerson, R., Wu, L.-Y. And Harindranath, G 2015, ‘From temporary competitive advantage to sustainable competitive advantage’, British Journal of Management, 26(4), pp. 617–636.
Latfullin, G 2016, ‘Scientific school of management theory’, Administration, 4(2), pp. 5–8.
Madanipour, A 2010, ‘Connectivity and contingency in planning’, Planning Theory, 9(4), pp. 351–368.
McAtavey, J and Nikolovska, I 2010, ‘Team collectivist culture: A remedy for creating team effectiveness’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(3), pp. 307–316.
Thompson, G and Vecchio, R.P 2009, ‘Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions’, The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), pp. 837–848.
Timiyo, A 2014, ‘High performance work practices: One best-way or no best-way’, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(6), pp. 08–14.
Van der Voet, J 2014, ‘the effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure’, European Management Journal, 32(3), pp. 373–382.