The paper "Transformational and Authoritarian Leadership Style" is a brilliant example of an essay on psychology. Leadership, the act or process of influencing people towards collective objectives, is an important element in an organizational setup. There are many leadership styles and contingency theory suggests that one leadership style may suit a given situation than are other leadership styles. Based on the theory, issues that pertain to the use of force, unmotivated employees, and internal corruption would require different leadership styles to resolve. Authoritarian leadership style would be most effective in resolving the use of force issues.
The leadership approach focuses on control along with an organizational structure, from top to bottom, and is based on allegiance to authority. It can, therefore, initiate or control issues that relate to force through an order that followers must obey. Authoritarian leadership focuses on immediate expectations, like controlling the use of force issues, and not behavioral effects on followers, though this identifies its weakness (Nevarez and Wood, 2010). The transformational leadership style, which focuses on empowerment and motivation among other issues, would be the most suitable for influencing unmotivated personnel.
The leadership approach identifies followers’ needs and potentials empower followers and meets their needs towards motivation. Meeting identified needs such as competence for performance would increase self worthwhile offering rewards for performance would initiate a positive attitude to initiate motivation among the personnel (Nevarez and Wood, 2010). Solving types of internal corruption would, however, require transformational leadership, a contingent approach that is based on positive or negative motivation. Many factors such as financial and behavioral factors affect the desire to engage in corruption and integrating factors that counteract motivation to corruption such as sufficient remuneration, rewards for non-corrupt personnel, and punishment against corrupt personnel would help (Nevarez and Wood, 2010).
Authoritarian leadership would, therefore, resolve the use of force issues while transformational leadership would resolve unmotivated personnel issues and transactional leadership would resolve internal corruption issues.