The paper "Recipe for a Successful Leader, Situational Approach of Leadership" is an outstanding example of a management assignment. The study made a significant contribution to the leadership and social learning theories in a bid to ensure credible, attractive, and ethical role models that push for integrity among the leaders. Integrity is an attribute and behavior that leaders need to demonstrate irrespective of the cultural backgrounds. Through a qualitative approach, the study achieved a greater understanding of leader integrity across the cultures. For the comparative analysis, the managers contributed their views on what they understand with leader integrity (Weems, 2010, 127).
The values, practices, and expectations of the leaders across the cultures are responsible for complicating the enactment of the integrity of leaders. The study identified various themes resonating the existing research on the leader and behavioral integrity. Some of the themes are aligned to the virtue, which is considered proximal indicators of leader integrity since they convey morally good intentions. Effective organizational leadership across cultures is important for international organizational operations. The core ingredients that define leadership universally are skills, good judgment, and integrity (Chamorro-Premuzic & Sanger, 2016).
However, the core recipe for a successful leader is the need for culture-specific condiments. Question 2 Cross-culture involves the manner in which people from different cultures interact. Cross-cultural leadership has developed to understand the leaders working within the new globalized markets. International institutions require leaders with the ability to adjust in different environments quickly and work with people from different cultures. Leaders behave and portray ethical cognition differently depending on their cultures. These adjustments are the major factors contributing to the differences in the results across the cultures.
Factors associated with moral maturation and conation models like moral complexity and identity tend to interact with various cultural values which in turn increases the sensitivity of the individuals to issues associated with leadership integrity. People in higher and lower leadership and professional positions have a different understanding of leadership integrity. Such demographic factors contribute significantly to the differences in the responses of participants on societal differences in the meaning of integrity (DePersis & Lewis, 2012, 192). Besides, organizational cultures, individual differences, and climate norms could interact with various forces of the society in heightening or weakening the beliefs on the integrity of leaders. Question 3 In the situational approach of leadership, the leadership is fast-changing and has a fluid role that needs to adapt to the development of the subordinate.
The theory is flexible based on the needs and involves different factors: delegating, coaching, directing, and supporting. This theory relates to word-action consistency theme which needs that leadership practices to conform to the uniformity of the outlined requirements (Heskett, 2012). According to the theme, action speaks louder than words.
In addition, the theory also relates to openness and transparency among the team members. Therefore, according to the theory, leadership requires people guided with strong personal moral values. This is in line with the need for flexibility for the accommodation of all the involved parties. Another theory is the path-goal theory, which views the role of a leader to assess every particular situation and ensure adequate flexibility to act with the directive, supportive, and participative. Based on the path-goal theory, leaders require people to achieve their goals; hence, the need for assistance, motivation, and supportive.
In such a line, the theory is applicable in honesty and fair and just. Leaders need to understand the weaknesses and strengths of the team members to enable fair and just judgment. Understanding needs to be in line with honesty and uprightness, which enable the leaders to stand firm while motivating good behavior. Since the path-goal theory relates to the need for ensuring the achievement of a common goal, relates to consideration and respect for others (Brown, 2007, 124). This theme ensures that leaders bring together all the involved parties.
In addition, it also relates to the value-behaviour consistency, which requires the leaders to be consistent in portraying their values to the other parties.
Bai, T. (2013). Early Confucian Political Philosophy and Its Contemporary Relevance. Dao Companion to Classical Confucian Philosophy, 4(3), 335-361.
Brown, M. T. (2007). Corporate integrity: Rethinking organizational ethics and leadership. Cambridge [u.a.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Sanger, M. (2016). What Leadership Looks Like in Different Cultures. Retrieved April 12, 2017, from https://hbr.org/2016/05/what-leadership-looks-like-in-different-cultures
Check, R. F., & Okwo, F. (2012). Influence of Demographic Factors on Stress Perceptions of Teachers of Public Secondary Schools in Cameroon. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 439-443.
Cohen, W. A. (2013). Heroic leadership: Leading with integrity and honor. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Den Dikken, M. (2002). Lexical Integrity, Checking, and the Mirror: A Checking Approach to Syntactic Word Formation. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 6(2), 169-225.
DePersis, D., & Lewis, A. (2012). Integrity and Leadership. Integrity in Organizations, 4(2), 188-225.
Egel, E., & Fry, L. W. (2016). Spiritual Leadership as a Model for Islamic Leadership. Public Integrity, 19(1), 77-95.
Globe Foundation. (2016). Results - Confucian Asia GLOBE Project. Retrieved April 12, 2017, from http://globeproject.com/results/clusters/confucian-asia?menu=list
Harari, O. (2002). The leadership secrets of Colin Powell. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hernandez, M. (2007). Promoting Stewardship Behavior in Organizations: A Leadership Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 121-128.
Heskett, J. (2012). Why Is Trust So Hard to Achieve in Management? - HBS Working Knowledge - Harvard Business School. Retrieved April 12, 2017, from http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/why-is-trust-so-hard-to-achieve-in-management
Ike, O. (2016). Core Values for Responsible Leadership: The Relevance of Ethics for Religion and Development. The Ecumenical Review, 68(4), 463-471.
Johnson, R. (2011). Different Types of Leadership Styles | Chron.com. Retrieved April 12, 2017, from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/5-different-types-leadership-styles-17584.html
Lessem, R., & Palsule, S. (2002). From local identity to global integrity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(4), 174-185.
Lynn-Sze, J. C., Yusof, N., & Ahmad, M. K. (2014). The Relevance of Confucian Values to Leadership Communication. Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication, 30(1), 129-144.
Martin, G. S., Keating, M. A., Resick, C. J., Szabo, E., Kwan, H. K., & Peng, C. (2013). The meaning of leader integrity: A comparative study across Anglo, Asian, and Germanic cultures. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(3), 445-461.
Vickers, M. (2004). Leadership Across Cultures. Retrieved April 12, 2017, from https://www.i4cp.com/trendwatchers/2004/09/03/leadership-across-cultures
Walker, A., & Truong, T. D. (2015). Confucian Values and Vietnamese School Leadership. Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2(1), 1-6.
Weems, L. H. (2010). Church leadership: Vision, team, culture, and integrity. Nashville: Abingdon Press.