The paper "Various Leadership Styles in Different Organizations" is a decent example of a Human Resources essay. These days, diverse forms of leadership styles subsist in work settings, and each leadership style has a number of advantages and disadvantages. The organizational goals as well as culture establish which style of leadership is best for the organization (Bonnici, 2011, p. 12). Basically, motivation is something each person has at changeable levels as well as for varying motives. Motivation can be enthused by others, therefore comprehending motivation principles is imperative for individuals as well as businesses.
2.1.0 Leadership Styles 2.1 Authoritarian This form of leadership style enables managers to decide single-handedly devoid of other input, in other words, managers have complete authority and enforce their will on staff. In this case, no employee can challenge their decisions; for instance, nations like North Korea as well as Cuba work under the authoritarian leadership style. According to Dessler and Phillips (2007, p. 387), this form of leadership style does well for workers who need close supervision. Innovative workers who succeed in team functions despise this leadership style. Autocratic styles of leadership regularly pursue the idea of those individuals in control such as managers, who essentially are not in harmony with their followers.
Examples of an autocratic form of leadership include a traffic police officer who always direct traffic and drivers follow their command without questioning, other examples include a manager instructing an employee to perform a certain task. Each of such position needs a different set of attributes that offer the leader the ability to perform their roles effectively or communicate efficiently. Traits of authoritarian leaders include setting goals independently, engaging mostly in downward and one-way communication, controlling meetings, and taking part in organizational interaction. A number of studies have validated an association between harassment, on the one hand, as well as an authoritarian leadership style as well as an oppressive method of solving conflicts or handling differences, on the other hand.
Bonnici, C.A., 2011. Creating a Successful Leadership Style: Principles of Personal Strategic Planning. Maryland, New York : R&L Education.
Dessler, G. & Phillips, J., 2007. Managing Now. New York: Cengage Learning.
Exantus, R., 2012. Pastoral Burnout and Leadership Styles: Factors Contributing to Stress and Ministerial Turnover. London: Author House.
Khatoon, N., 2011. General Psychology. Delhi: Pearson Education India.
Lauby, S.J., 2005. Motivating Employees. New York : American Society for Training and Development.
Rathus, S.A., 2006. Psychology: Concepts and Connections, Brief Version. New York: Cengage Learning.