The paper "Logistics-Supply Chain: Oak Hills" is an outstanding example of a business assignment. Even though the effects of the lean system on employees are debatable, its implementation in an organization that had mass production previously is substantial. Since lean system focuses mainly on adding the value to the products to meet the customers' desires, the amount of task in this system is relatively high that the mass production system. According to Parker (2003), the lean system transfers the maximum number of duties and responsibilities to the workers, while adding value to the product line and reducing the waste associated with the production process.
This marks one of the instances of impacts of implementing the lean system on the employees. Since the system has increased the number of tasks and responsibilities, their attitudes towards the system would be most likely negative. The increased responsibilities and tasks impact their morale towards their work. In as much as there are various techniques employed to determine the workload for the employees, the quality and standards of the production process and products entirely depend on the employees themselves (Womack, Jones & Roos, 1990; Worley & Doolen, 2006).
Therefore, Oak Hills management should expect changes in attitude towards new tasks and responsibilities. Also, a lean system requires multi-skills and high level of problem detecting and solving abilities among the employees. Womack and the colleagues (1990) and Parker (2003) explain that lean system majorly entails quick detection of production process defects and problems to anticipate their causes. According to Parker, a multi-skilled and highly organized team of employees is then required to assess the reasons for the defects and design a process for eliminating them and increasing the quality and value of the intended product.
Therefore, implementing the lean system in Oak Hills is likely to affect the employees about their abilities to adjust and match the requirements of the system. The employees are most likely to resist some of the intended changes. Wittig (2012) argues that the perceived complex changes are what causes resistance to change in most organizations. With the new lean system, Oak Hills management is likely to face resistance to change. However, Oak Hills can manage the impacts of the lean system implementation on the employees, as well as the potential response from them.
Since the system is a tool that most organizations embrace to remain competitive and boost their profitability, communications and management support is essential while implementing it (Worley & Doolen, 2006). Therefore, it is imperative that Oak Hills maintains open, skilled and facilitated communication among the employees and the management. This methodology will enhance and facilitate detection and solution of problems during the implementation and adjustment. Question 2: Oak Hills’ Stage of Development of Supply Chain To gain maximum profitability and remain competitive, an organization requires a successful supply chain.
However, supply chain management entails a vast range of functions and responsibilities that must be comprehended for the chain to be successful. Tan (2001) argues that the process for achieving the desired supply chain in an organization requires modeling it into various stages. The most common model that almost all organizations employ is Supply Chain Operations References (SCOR). This model operates in five sequential stages with the next stage highly dependent on the previous one.
According to Tan, the following are the stages involved in SCOR supply chain management model;