Essays on The Building Blocks for Toyota - a Base of Management Decisions on a Long-Term Philosophy Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ The Building Blocks for Toyota - a Base of Management Decisions on a Long-Term Philosophy” is a perfect example of a case study on management. Toyota, a Japan-based automobile manufacturer, has presently the fastest process to develop products in the world. As per reports, Toyota takes around 12 months and sometimes even lesser than that to design a new car, while most automobile manufacturers require more than two to three years. Further, despite such a tough deadline, the company has been able to maintain exceptional quality standards as compared to its competitors in the market. Toyota has been able to create operational excellence by developing various strategies through the use of methodologies and tools to improve quality.

Further, it has also developed a deep-seated business philosophy that helps in understanding the employees and motivating them to work towards achieving business goals and visions. The success of Toyota’ s supply chain management is based on the company’ s ability to create teams and leaders, develop a supportive culture, form strategies, build lasting relationships with suppliers and to maintain an organization based on sustained learning (Harrison and New 2002). This paper therefore would focus on how Toyota through its innovative strategies has been able to measure and improve supply chain management.

The paper would further discuss how the company has created operationally one of the best-managed firms globally and what other companies may learn from Toyota to improve their supply chain management. The Toyota Production SystemThe Toyota Production System was being developed by Toyota post the Second World War. During that era, GM and Ford used strategies such as economies of scale, large equipment, mass production to create as many machine parts as possible in a cheaper manner.

Toyota on the other hand had a very small market and was required to create a variety of cars through the same assembly line for satisfying its clients (Callioni and Billington 2001). Toyota also shortened the lead times and kept the production lines flexible, which led to better quality, productivity, customer responsiveness, and optimal utilization of space and equipment.


Ballou, R.H. 2004, Business Logistics/Supply Chain Management, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Barratt, M. 2004, “Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 30-42.

Burgess, K. and Singh, P. 2006, “A proposed integrated framework for analyzing supply chains”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 337-44.

Burt, D.N., Dobler, D.W. and Starling, S.L. 2003, Worldclass Supply Management: The Key to Supply Chain Management, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Callioni, G and Billington, C. 2001, “Effective collaboration”, OR/MS Today, Vol. 28, pp. 34–39.

Chopra, S. and Meindl, P. 2004, Supply Chain Management, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

Frohlich, M.T. and Westbrook, R. 2001, “Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 185-200.

Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C. and Tittiroglu, E. 2001, “Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment,” Int J Opns Prod Mngt, Vol. 21, pp. 71–87.

Handfield, R.B. and Bechtel, C. 2001, “The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 10, No. 1.

Harrison, A. and New, C. 2002, “The role of coherent supply chain strategy and performance measurement in achieving competitive advantage: an international survey,” J Opl Res Soc Vol. 53, pp. 263–271.

Hausman, W.H. 2002, “Supply chain performance metrics”, In: Billington C, Harrison T, Lee H and Neale J (eds), The Practice of Supply Chain Management, Kluwer: Boston.

Heizer, J. and Render, B. 2005, Operations Management, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Krajewski, L. and Ritzman, L. 2002, Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, 6th ed., Prentice-Hall, New York, NY.

Lai, K., Ngai, E.W.T. and TCE Cheng 2002, “Measures for evaluating supply chain performance in transport logistics”, Transp Res Part E Vol. 38, pp. 439–456.

Liker, J.K. and Wu, Y. 2000, “Japanese automakers. US suppliers and supply-chain superiority,” Sloan Mngt Rev, Vol. 42, pp. 81–93.

Otto, A. and Kotzab, H. 2003, “Does supply chain management really pay? Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain,” Eur J Opl Res, Vol. 144, pp. 306–320.

Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P. and Simchi-Levi, E. 2000, Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case studies, Irwin/McGraw-Hill: Boston.

Sterman, J.D. 2000, Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, McGraw-Hill: Boston.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us