Transcendental Leadership Versus Management in the Hospitality Industry - Assignment Example

Part A The term management has grown with time and it tends to include both leaders and managers as different traits are being demonstrated by leaders and managers in the work arena. This has coupled the importance of their role as both look to ensure that the work is accomplished in the best possible manner so that the resources are use effectively (Reh, 2010). Despite the growing importance of managers and leaders there is contrasting differences between their working style as managers focuses more of monitoring, directing and refining current performance whereas leaders has been equated with dynamism, vibrancy and charisma. This paper thereby looks into the manner the different personality and working traits gets influenced by self awareness and the manner self awareness helps both leaders and managers to accomplish their task. Leaders and managers have opposing styles as managers believe in monitoring, directing and refining current performance whereas leaders are equated with dynamism, vibrancy and charisma which thereby increase the role of both the individual in the organization. Since, both demonstrate opposing qualities the importance of those qualities magnifies when both leaders and managers are able to use their self awareness to accomplish the task (Kumle, Kelly & Nancy, 2010). This is because of the fact that self awareness makes both leader and managers realize the important areas and having opposing traits ensures that both the individual are able to direct their efforts towards the common goal but in a different way. Self awareness on the part of managers and leaders helps to accomplish difficult task which otherwise would not have been possible. Having self awareness makes them realize the importance of the situation and use different traits to accomplish the work in hand. This is evident in the hotel industry where self awareness helps to direct the leader to use his influential qualities and ensure that the work force is directed in such a manner that will be beneficial for the organization and will also ensure maximum efficiency. This has been possible only due to the fact that self awareness made the leader realize the different qualities that has to be used. This also substantiates another point that different traits work in different situations and being able to identify those is self awareness and it helps to ensure maximum efficiency for the organization (Angelo, 2009). A study in a similar direction highlights that managers tend to use their technical skills and are problem solvers, hard working and looks towards accomplishing the goals in comparison to leaders who are imaginative, risk takers and brilliant in developing new ideas (Yukl, 2009). Managers and leaders both are able to be successful in their different fields purely because of the fact that they have high self awareness. They are able to understand the surrounding environment better and keeping in mind the environment they are able to create a situation where they look for alternatives. Having a presence of mind and being able to feel the changes that will be encountered in the future both managers and leaders are able to use their self imaginative power and develop self awareness which helps them to deal with different contingencies (Yukl, 2009). The above work was further substantiated by another finding which states that since managers are authoratian and leaders are charismatic it has resulted in managers demonstrating transactional style and leaders demonstrating transformational style (James, 2010). The different style results in different imaginative and self awareness power. This makes both of them think differently and look towards developing a different mechanism which will help them to deal with the situation. Since, having a different style results in different way to access the same thing it creates different self awareness and highlights different situations which they focus on to solve their problems and ensure better coordination between the departments. Self awareness helps to create an image of the prevalent situation and helps to find out different mechanism which will help them to solve the same problem. This is seen in the working of both leader and manager as both have different horizons. Manager’s focuses on the goal but leaders look for the maximum horizon. The difference in the horizon of both results in different self awareness among the individuals which thereby results in different ways to achieve the task (Worral & Cooper, 2010). Since, difference in horizon results in a different self awareness it helps organization to ensure that the efforts of both the individual accomplishing the task in a different way. A wide difference which has been noticed in the working of managers and leader due to different self imagination and awareness is the fact that leaders look towards being collaborative with people and look towards removing the differences so that they are able to achieve the task. Managers on the other hand tend to create situations which will make the employees work according to the situation and accomplish the work (El Sabba, 2010). The different working pattern creates a different mind set for both the leader and the manager. This results in both the individual using different situations in a different way. This is mainly due to the fact that different ways of working results in different self awareness which makes them use the resources in a different way but the goal is the same. Thus, it tends to create a situation where different self awareness due to different personality traits helps the organization in achieving the work in a different way. The difference in the self awareness between managers and leaders can be looked from the fact that leaders when faced with a similar situation they did before look for a new way to accomplish the task whereas managers tend to use the same method (James, 2010). This is primarily due to the difference in self awareness between both the individuals. This difference makes them look towards using a different way and they tend to adopt the way they find the most suitable. An interesting fact to note here is that despite demonstrating different traits and different self awareness for the same situation by both managers and leaders it the ability to have self awareness which helps them works in the best possible manner (Cross, 2010). Since, both manager and leader are able to create self awareness it helps them to accomplish the task and they are able to visualize the situation well before it has taken place. Self awareness thus has a vital role in shaping the behavior of both the manager and the leader and the ability to imagine the situation before it exist helps them to deal with the situation in a better way. Imagining a situation where the managers and leaders lack self awareness could be one where decisions are taken only after the situation has occurred. This will result in creating a situation where the managers and employees are able to react and provide solutions after the happening of an event resulting their personal traits and qualities to be wastage (Bateman & Snell, 2009). This will make the role of both manager and leader to be ineffective and they won’t be able to accomplish the role for which they have been hired in the organization. Self awareness thereby has a large role to play in the success of both manager and leaders. Despite the fact that both the individual demonstrate different personality and working traits self awareness directs and guides them in accomplishing the task. Self awareness helps them to create an image of the situation before it had occurred and the different traits help both the leader and the manager to accomplish the task in a different way. Thus, self awareness has a large role in shaping the performance of both the manager and the leader and individuals who are able to recognize it and use it in the best possible manner are able to achieve efficiency in their work. Part B Self awareness helps both managers and leader to accomplish their task in an efficient way. This has been substantiated by various studies and research which support it. This has been substantiated by Angelo, 2009 in a finding which states that self awareness helps managers and leaders to realize the importance of the situation and create a mechanism which will help them as seen from the hotel industry. This is further substantiated by Yukl, 2009 where the writer states that having self awareness helps both leaders and managers as different traits help them to accomplish and visualize the situation in a different manner and find the best possible mechanism which will ensure efficiency and help to accomplish the task. This finding has been put by James, 2010 where he states that difference in self awareness makes leaders and managers react to the situation is a different way. In this finding the author states that manager due to their manner of self awareness looks towards the same solution if the problem has been encountered before whereas leaders look to find another alternative. This is primarily due to different self awareness ability and the ability to visualize things in a differen way. Bateman & Snell, 2009 puts it in another way and states that if managers and leaders lacked self awareness then they could arrive at the decision only after the event had occurred and would not have been possible to visualize it before. This will make the role of both manager and leader to be ineffective and they won’t be able to accomplish the role for which they have been hired in the organization. Thus self awareness has a role to play and it helps to shape the manner in which both leaders and managers work. Thus, various research and findings supports the view that self awareness helps both managers and leaders to be able to deal with situation in a better way and it supports their work by helping them to accomplish it in the best possible manner. References Angelo, C. 2009 Transcendental Leadership versus management in hospitality industry. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 8 (1), 61-70 Bateman, T. & Snell, S. 2009. Management: The New Competitive Landscape. 8th Edition, McGraw Hill, New York Cross, R. 2010. Assessing the jump to knowledge based work. Business Horizon, 43 (5), 29-36 El-Sabaa, S. 2010 The skill and career path of an effective project manager. International Journal of Project Management, 19 (1), 1-7 James, K. 2010. Leadership versus Management: What’s the difference. Journal of Quality and Participation, 17 (7), 121-125 Kumle, J., Kelly, J. & Nancy, J. 2010. Leadership versus management. Journal on High Bam Research, 3 (2), 23-47 Reh, F. 2010. Management 101. about.com, The New York Times Company Yukl, G. 2009. Managerial Leadership. Journal of Management, 15 (2), 251-289 Worral, L. & Cooper, C. 2010. Management Skills Development: A perspective on current issues. Leadership & Organisational Development, 22 (1), 34 Read More