The paper 'The Relationship between Work and Non-Work" is a good example of a business literature review. Changing patterns in the world of employment has prompted most of the social researchers to focus significantly on family life and paid work. This piece of writing examines employment through congruent classical emerging sectors in the UK and American economy (developed countries). These sectors include the recently improved technology in western society which has a stunning growth to the economy. It has also enhanced households to easily earn daily care right from home. The paper has used Financial-based reports and Survey Census reports to analyze the intersection between work and non-work life.
Also, policies and strategies that western culture has put in place in the labor market have been explained since it explains the vital elements of this relationship. Business organizations, on the other hand, have encountered employee spillover which has led to the majority of employees to work from home. The study also identifies various ways in which individuals cope with complex situations in two work domains (work and non-work) and how they integrate diverse resources in pasturing and enlarging their income brackets. Introduction “ Work” and “ non-work” considerably takes political, social and scholarly debate, especially in western cultures.
The interface in the two domains constitutes families, organizations and society. Apparently, the study of the relationship between work and non-work domains has duly risen in the 21st century with the United States and the UK pinpointing the vital elements of the intersection. There is an element of analogous gender segregation in the current labor market which has contributed to dual-income contribution in the family.
Therefore, the paper evaluates the relationships of work and non-work life through social and political avenues. Rothbard, (2000) found that 20 years ago, working at home and working in the organization in the UK was less the same. The intersection of workplace responsibilities and home life duties in two domains (work and non-work) is currently experienced in the modern economy. The empirical research by Bianchi and Milkie (2009) shows that this connection between institutional responsibilities and household duties has predominantly generated high-income profiles in labor markets especially the families that have dual income generation. This shows that an employed member of the family will have to take double responsibilities which will make him/her work more hours in order to earn daycare for the family.
Considering the campaign of the US president in 2008 about health reforms, it brought into attention the determinants of healthy living that focus on cultural values especially those principles that are tied to gender and marriage (Bianchi and Milkie, 2009, pg. 704). The campaign gives us four vital examples of this intersection; Sarah Palin, who was the vice president in the Republican Party was having special needs child during highly profiled elections periods in Alaska.
She had to step down from the campaign and look after the child, Michelle Obama who was a lawyer and a mother of two had to boycott her career in order to campaign for her husband who was going for a presidential seat during the same campaign, Hillary Clinton took a position in the U. S government as a secretary of state. Joseph Biden, Vice President in Democrat Party became a single parent when his wife died in the road accident.
He had to be commuting every day from his home to Washington in order to offer parental care to his children.
Bianchi, S. and Milkie, M. 2009. Work and Family Research in the First Decade of the 21st Century, journal of Marriage and Family. http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~jmuniz/work_bianchi_milkie2010_marriage%20and%20family.pdf
Chesterton, G. K. 1926. Women in the Workplace and at Home. London. http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/Women_in_the_Workplace.html
Demerouti, E. and Geurts, S. 2003. Work/Non-Work Interface: A Review of Theories and Findings. Netherlands: University of Nijmegen Press.
European Working Conditions Observatory, May 2011. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/2011/06/UK1106039I.htm
Hyman, J., Scholarios, D. and Baldry, B. 2005. Gettign on or Getting by? Employees Flexibility and Coping Strategies for Home and Work, Work Employment Society journal. DOI: 10.1177/0950017005058055.
Kirby, M. 2000. Sociology in Perspective AQA Edition Student Book. London: Heinemann.
Kompier, M., Ybema, J.F., Janssen, J. & Taris, T. 2009. Employment contracts: cross-sectional and longitudinal relations with quality of working life, health and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health.
Pinnelli, A. and Anker, R. 2003. Women in the Labor Market in Changing Economies: Demographic Issues. UK: Oxford University Press, 208-235.
Pronk, N. 2005. Work Health Promotion, The Challenge of Work and Family Balance, Health and fitness journal. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Rosenfeld, R. A. 1993. Women’s Part-Time Employment: Individual and Country-Level Variation, International Sociological Association, Durham.
Rothbard, N. P. 2000. Mechanisms Linking Work and Family: Clarifying the Relationship Between Work and Family Constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 170-200. DIO:10.2307/259269
The Aviva Family Finance Report 2011.
United States Census Bureau 2006. http://www.census.gov/#