The paper “ Маnаging Еmрlоyее Еngаgеmеnt” is a spectacular example of the essay on human resources. Every organization requires motivated and hardworking employees; this is only possible if the engagement level of the employee is high enough. The management and leaders have the sole responsibility to enhance such qualities employees so that they become completely engaged towards the organization. This paper shall analyze such a relationship between performance, high engagement level, and leadership strategies in enhancing the before mentioned concept. AnalysisEmployees must always remain high on motivation, organizational commitment, and trust if an organization is to become productive.
Before evaluating the before mentioned relationship between performance, high engagement level, and leadership strategies it is important to define and explain the concept of being “ engaged” to an organization or showing engagement towards an organization. “ Engaged” can be defined as being involved or being committed to a certain thing. Workers consider themselves to be engaged when they feel that their job has personal meaning and motivation, get positive interpersonal encouragement, and work in a well-organized office environment. Such an employee considers the outcome to be apart of his/her own result, with the wish to contribute to accomplishing more than just their personal goals.
Thus it may be said an employee who is highly motivated and inspired may be considered as an engaged employee as well. However, building an engaged workforce is still a challenge for a lot of organizations. As it needs successful leadership and many additional organizational factors to aid employees to find their full ability and worth. Mainly with an unpredictable economy, organizations must give attention to increasing employee productivity and existing organizational income. Sufficient revenues may be identified by an organization through the most advantageous engagement of its employees’ awareness, talent capability, and enthusiasm. Employee Engagement may also be considered as the extent to which employee loyalty, both emotional and logical, is present during accomplishing the work, aim, and objective of the organization.
Argyris, Chris (1998). Empowerment: The Emperor's New Clothes. Harvard Business Review . 98-105 pp.
Axelrod, Richard H (2000). Terms of Engagement: Changing the Way We Change Organizations. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 222 pp.
Ayers, Keith (2008). Engagement Is Not Enough: You Need Passionate Employees to Achieve Your Dream. Elevate
Baetz, Stephen (1997). Motivation Musts. Management Perspectives no. 83 . 2 pp.
Bayne, S (1998). Zapp! The Lightening of Empowerment — How to Improve Quality, Productivity, and Employee Satisfaction. Administrative Assistant's Update 4-5 pp.
Bowen, David E. and Lawler, Edward E(1992). The Empowerment of Service Workers: What, Why, How, and When. Sloan Management Review 33, no. 3 . 31-36 pp.
Brady Chris & MacLeod, David (2008). The Extra Mile - How to Engage Your People to Win. Edition, illustrated. Publisher, Prentice Hall
Byham, William C. and Cox, Jeff. Zapp! (1997)The Lightening of Empowerment: How to Improve Quality, Productivity, and Employee Satisfaction. Random House, Inc., . 212 pp.
Clark R. Timothy (2012), The Employee Engagement Mindset. The Six Drivers for Tapping into the Hidden Potential of Everyone in Your Company McGraw-Hill;
Covey, Stephen (1997). Reciprocal Relationships. Incentive 171, Issue 7 20-21 pp.
Filipczak, Bob (1998). Employee Satisfaction Linked to Age. Training 35, Issue 6
Finck, Gunther(1998). Satisfaction Versus Motivation. Across The Board 35, Issue 9 55-57 pp.
Gandy, Dottie and Lowe, Jack (2001). Thirty Days to a Happy Employee: How a Simple Program of Acknowledgement can Build Trust and Loyalty at Work. Simon & Schusler Trade Paperbacks, 208 pp.
Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., Kilham, E.A. and Agrawal, S. (2009) Q12 Metaanalysis: The Relationship between Engagement at Work and Organizational Outcomes Gallup
Harter, James K (2002). Business Unit-Level Relationship between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, Issue 2 . 268-279 pp.
Harter, James K.; Schmidt, Frank L.; Hayes, Theodore L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol 87(2), Apr 2002, 268-279
Kahn, William A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, No. 4 (Dec., 1990), pp. 692–724.
Katzenbach, Jon R (2000). Peak Performance: Aligning the Hearts and Minds of your Employees. Harvard Business School Press,. 304 pp.
Kruse, Kevin (2012). Employee Engagement 2.0. How to Motivate Your Team for High Performance (A Real-World Guide for Busy Managers) CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
Macey, Schneider (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial Organizational Psychology.
MacLeod, David & Clarke, Nita (2009). Engaging for Success: enhancing performance through employee engagement. A report to government, London, United Kingdom.
Meyer & Allen (1991). A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89
Myatt Mike (2009), Tenure versus Loyalty. Retrieved from http://www.business-strategy-innovation.com/2009/10/tenure-versus-loyalty.htm 9 December 2012l l
Robinson D, Perryman S, Hayday S (2004) Report 408, Institute for Employment Studies, retrieved from http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/pubs/summary.php?id=408 on 9 December 2012
Simon L. Albrecht (2011), "Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and Practice", Human Resource
Smith, Kendall, & Hulin (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes.