Essays on Managing in Ambiguity and Change Essay

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Managing in Ambiguity and Change” is a cogent example of the essay on management. This paper will discuss ambiguity and change, it evaluates the challenges that result due to oversimplification of information or lack of, the reasons why people treat complex issues as simple issues, the critical thinking, and approaches and the role of self-managing in enabling a manager to deal with complex issues. Ambiguity is a condition whereby information has more than one interpretation (Dopson, 1997). It is unclear communication amongst the parties involved. It brings costs to organizations or businesses.

The costs are both monetary and non-monetary loss; the non-monetary loss includes time and goodwill. The cause of ambiguity is attributed to the over-simplification of complex issues; the information that is being put across loses the initial meaning. There are various tools that can be used in the management of ambiguity (Dopson, 1997). They include extensive use of research and use of self-assessment of the employees though human resource personnel. The oversimplification of information is caused by a lack of information on an issue (Gilley, 2001).

The shallow knowledge about something will prompt in making wrong conclusions about something. Managers that continually use ambiguous information tend to make wrong decisions on behalf of the firm (Booher, 2007). In addition the managers are inclined to treat complex issues as simple issues, this may be because they believe that the causes are complex and the solutions are easy to solve (Dopson, 1997). Managers are also inspiration agents in a company and must motivate and inspire their employees, they should look at complex issues as simple issues and should give amicable solutions to the problems underway (Verweij, 2006). Undoubtedly unclear communication in corporate organizations is a major and a complex issue that has been over-simplified and the consequences resulted in increased costs for business practices.

Only clear communication can get an audience to understand something of valid importance hence a barrier to effective communication can result to disastrous consequences (Kidwell, 2005).

References

Arduini, S. (2007).Metaphors. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.

Beech, N., &MacIntosh, R. (2012).Managing Change: Enquiry and Action. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Booher, D. D. (2007). The voice of authority: 10 communication strategies every leader needs to

know. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Dopson, S. (1997).Managing Ambiguity and Change: Case of the NHS. Basingstoke: Palgrave

Macmillan.

Drucker, P. F., &Maciariello, J. A. (2008).Management. New York, NY: Collins.

Gilley, J. W. (2001). The manager as change agent: A practical guide for developing highperformance

people and organizations. Cambridge, Mass: Perseus Pub.

Kidwell, R. E., & Martin, C. L. (2005).Managing organizational deviance. Thousand Oaks:

SAGE Publications.

Melbourne City Mission.(1982). Self-management. North Fitzroy [Vic.: Melbourne City Mission.

McCaskey, M. B. (1982). The executive challenge: Managing change and ambiguity. Boston:

Pitman.

Pondy, L. R., Boland, R., & Thomas, H. (1988).Managing ambiguity and change. Chichester

[England: Wiley.

TerjeAven, OrtwinRenn. (2010). Risk Management and Governance.Springer-Verlag Berlin

Heidelberg.

Vecchio, R. P. (1997). Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in

organizations. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.

Verweij, M., & Thompson, M. (2006).Clumsy solutions for a complex world: Governance,

politics and plural perceptions. Basingstoke [England: Palgrave Macmillan.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us