The paper "Ngai Tahu Holdings Corporation Organizational Design Features" is an outstanding example of a marketing case study. Ngai Tahu Holdings Corporation is a New Zealand company present in property development, seafood processing, investment and tourism. The company has been steadily making huge returns on investment because of consistent use of knowledge, resources and competencies to become competitive. Given a diversified strategy, it has spread its risk into different sectors and benefited from coordination, de-centralization, and establishing line and staff relationships. Ngai Tahu is a formally structured organized with a management board under a chief executive.
Using a modern matrix structure, the organization’ s employees locate themselves in a strong multi-project environment despite the tensions between the requirement of the different functions and projects. The structure espouses teamwork, great planning, good management skills, and willingness to compromise, and good communication. In this organizational design, effort and energies go to designated projects amid occasional tensions and role conflicts. On the other hand, competitiveness, globalization, knowledge economy, and diversity and information technology inform the latest developments in the organizational design field. As well, strategy, environment, size of an organization, age of the organization, and technology are contingency factors affect Ngai Tahu organizational design. In this essay, attention was given to the analysis of current design features of Ngai Tahu Holdings as well as recommendations to its current organizational design.
Specifically, the essay recognizes Ngai Tahu as a formal organization in a mature stage and in a mechanistic state complete with procedures, structure and rules. Having grown in size, Ngai Tahu has become predictable as it slowly transforms from being mechanistic to organic in structure.
With a change in strategy, it means that the structure will also have to change for the organization to achieve its objectives. Secondly, the essay describes the principles of organizational design and of particular interest are the hierarchy of command, role definition, evaluation of outcomes and altering the organizational structure. Thirdly, the essay recognizes the matrix structure from a number of structural options such as functional, divisional, network and team structures. Here, it observes that the matrix has functional specialization, adaptability and expertise to pursue economies of scale. However, with multiple chains of command, it raises conflicts over divisional and functional objectives.
Fourthly, the essay identifies technology, globalization, competitiveness and diversity as some of the latest developments in the organizational design field. It suggests that organizations have to change with the dynamic nature of the external forces that influence the organization. As such, the essay draws from the PESTLE tool to perform environmental scanning and review of the industry at which the company’ s scale of operations is based. Fifthly, the essay shows that strategy, environment, size of the organization, age of the organization, and technology as critical in organizational design decisions. Finally, the essay recommends the development of work-study systems and reviews and job description that matches the actual skills and qualifications.
Moreover, it recommends reward systems for best-performing employees in informal organizations. Specifically, the essay shows that Maori people special employee skills and competencies in cooking traditional Maori seafood and handling guests and visitors. These skills should be nurtured and protected.
Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E., Rees, C. & Gatenby, M. (2010.) Creating an Engaged Workforce. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Berkovitch, E., Israel, R. & Spiegel, Y. (2010). A double moral hazard model of organization design. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19(1): 55-85.
Bhattacharyya, D.K. (2009). Organizational Systems, Design, Structure and Management. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.
Galbraith, J. R., Downey, D. & Kates, A. (2005). Designing Dynamic Organizations. New York: AMACOM.
Head, T., Yaeger, T. & Sorensen, P. (2010). Global organization structural design: speculation and a call for action. Organization Development Journal. 28(2): 41-48.
Hesselbein, F. & Goldsmith, M. (2009). The Organization of the Future 2: Visions, Strategies, and Insights on Managing in New Era. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Macleod, D. & Clarke, N. (2009) Engaging for Success: Enhancing performance through employee engagement. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
Mcmillan, E. (2000). Considering Organization Structure and Design from a Complexity Paradigm Perspective. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Ministry of Fisheries New Zealand (2016). The Government’s Aquaculture Strategy and Five-year Action Plan to Support Aquaculture. Available at: http://www.fish.govt.nz/NR/rdonlyres/20A0ED89-A20B-4975-9E63-6B302187840D/0/AQUAStrat5yrplan2012.pdf
Ngai Tahu Holdings (2016). Group profile, structure, and report. Available at: http://www.ngaitahuholdings.co.nz/group-profile/group-structure/
Shuman, J. & Twombly, J. (2010). Collaborative networks are the organisation: an innovation in organization design and management. The Journal for Decision Makers, 35(1): 1-13.
Thompson, S.J. (2015). Getting big results from a small business unit. Harvard Business Review. 2(3): 27-33.
Young, M. (2011). Trading Fish, Saving Fish: The Interaction between Regimes in International Law. Cambridge University Press.