Essays on Perceptions of Consumers towards Responsible Gambling Report

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Perceptions of Consumers towards Responsible Gambling" is a great example of a marketing report. Gambling is a controversial topic in advertising because it determines the level of trust that consumers have on a particular product or service advertised. There are polarized views with regards to advertising with some views supportive of the idea while others opposing the idea. Polarized views result from functions that gambling messages convey in the modern market economy (Allcock, 2002). There are negative views towards gambling messages such as the creation of trickery artificial needs among consumers, generation of demands that cannot be satisfied and also a creation of the demands that result into disaster to the society.

There is also increased controversy in commercial gambling in the public sphere. It has been associated with increased entertainment for consumers, creation of employment opportunities, generation of gambling companies’ services and generation of revenues through taxes (Bjerg, 2010). There are also negative views towards gambling messages that have a moral dimension, associating gambling messages with hedonism, individualism and fatalism. Gambling messages have also been associated with public concerns such as the creation of psychological harms that have impacts on parts of the population.

In addition, gambling can result in polarization of views, making people develop a negative attitude towards it, while others assuming a social responsibility of being gamblers (Dedonno & Detterman, 2008). In various parts of the world, responsible provision of gambling messages such as responsible advertising has become a significant part of the companies’ descriptions. Responsible gambling has also been associated with the protection of consumers in a number of ways such as protecting consumers from national harms of gambling such as excessive involvement. The practice of gambling has been common in most industrialized countries and most adults have been observed to gamble at least once a year.

This is because, they associate gambling with the addition of quality to life (Gainsbury, 2011). Advertising enables attaining value for gambling through the creation of information about products and services and ensures enjoyable forms of gambling are implemented. Responsible gambling messages have been formulated in Australia mainly because there are many risky gambling activities that take place thus the need to ensure its regulation.

Other factors that pose potential constraints to the growth and success of responsible gambling have been suggested to include trust in regulators, perception of consumer safety and responsible gambling processes.


1. References

Allcock, C. 2002. Current issues related to identifying the problem gambler in the gaming venue.

Australian Gaming Council: Current issues. Melbourne: Australian Gaming Council.

American Gaming Association 2006. State of the States 2006: The American Gaming

Association survey of casino entertainment.

Bjerg, O. 2010. Problem gambling in poker: money, rationality and control in a skill-based

social game. International Gambling Studies, 10, 239-254.

Carragher, N., McWilliams, L. A. 2011. A latent class analysis of DSM-IV criteria for

pathological gambling: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and

Related Conditions. Psychiatry Research, 187, 185-192.

Dedonno, M. A., & Detterman, D. K. 2008. Poker is a skill. Gaming Law Review, 12(1), 31-36.

Dickson, L., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R.2004. Youth Gambling Problems: Examining Risk and

Protective Factors. International Gambling Studies, 8, 25-47.

Dinev ,T., Bellotto, M., Hart, P., Russo, V., Serra, I., & Colautti, C. 2006. Privacy calculus

model in e-commerce—a study of Italy and the United States. European Journal of

Information Systems, 15, 389–402.

Gainsbury, S. 2011. Player Account-based Gambling: Potentials for Behaviour-based Research

Methodologies. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 153-171.

Gainsbury, S. 2012. Internet gambling: Current research findings and implications. New York:


Gainsbury, S., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Blaszczynski 2012. The impact of Internet

gambling on gambling problems: A comparison of moderate-risk and problem Internet

and non-Internet gamblers. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Grant, J.E. & S.W. Kim. 2001. Demographic and clinical features of 131 adult pathological

gamblers. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 62(12), 957-962.

Griffiths, M. & P. Delfabbro. 2001. The biopsychosocial approach to gambling: Contextual

factors in research and clinical interventions. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues:

eGambling 5.

Griffiths, M. 2007. Gambling addiction and its treatment within the NHS: A guide for healthcare

professionals. London: British Medical Association.

Griffiths, M.D. & M. Auer. 2013. The irrelevancy of game-type in the acquisition, development,

and maintenance of problem gambling. Frontiers in Psychopathology 3, Article 621.

Griffiths, M.D. 2005. Does gambling advertising contribute to problem gambling? International

Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 3(2), 15-25.

Jawad, C. & Griffiths, S. 2008. A critical analysis of online gambling websites. Paper presented

at the 2008 EBEN-UK Annual Conference, Cambridge, UK.

Johnson, C., & Hult, P. 2008. Web buyers and their expectations grow up: Experienced web

buyers are becoming the new mainstream. Forrest Research, Retrieved December 15,

2010, from:,5110,45462,00.pdf.

Jolley, B., Mizerski, R., & Olaru, D. 2006. How habit and satisfaction affects player retention for online gambling. Journal of Business Research, 59, 770-777.

Kau, A-K., & Loh, E. W-Y. 2006. The effects of service recovery on consumer satisfaction: A

comparison between complainants and non-complainants. Journal of Services Marketing,

20, 101-111.

Lamont, M., Hing, N., & Gainsbury, S. 2011. Gambling on sport sponsorship: A conceptual

framework for research and regulatory review. Sport Management Review, 14, 246-257.

Ledgerwood, D.M., & Petry, N.M. 2006. Psychological experience of gambling and subtypes of

pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Research, 144, 17−27.

Mizerski, D. & K. Mizerski. 2001. The effect and implications for a stochastic pattern of lotto

game play. International Gambling Studies 1(1), 132-149.

Mizerski, D., R. Miller, K. Mizerski & D. Lam. 2004. The stochastic nature of purchasing a

state’s lottery products. Australasian Marketing Journal 12(3), 56-69.

Parke, A. Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. 2005. Can playing poker be good for you? Poker as a

transferable skill. Journal of Gambling Issues, 14 144-150.

Parke, J., Rigbye, J., & Parke, A. 2008. Cashless and card-based technologies in gambling: A

review of the literature. Report for the Gambling Commission, University of Salford,


Petry, N. & Weinstock, J. 2007. Internet gambling is common in college students and associated

with poor mental health. The American Journal on Addictions, 16, 325-330.

Petry, N.M. 2003. A comparison of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers based on preferred gambling activity. Addiction, 98, 645-655.

Pew Research Center. 2006. Gambling: As the take rises so does public concern. Retrieved

January 15, 2009, from:

Wood, R. & Williams, R. 2007 Problem Gambling on the Internet: Implications for Internet

Gambling Policy in North America. New Media & Society, 9, 520-542.

Wood, R., & Williams, R. 2010, Internet Gambling: Prevalence, Patterns, Problems, and Policy

Options. Final Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre,

Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Wood, R., & Williams, R. 2011. A comparative profile of the Internet gambler: Demographic

characteristics, game play patterns, and problem gambling status. New Media &

Society, 13, 1123–1141.

Yuon, S., R.J. Faber & D.V. Shah. 2000. Restricting gambling: Advertising and the third-person

effect. Psychology and Marketing 17(7), 633-649.

Zangeneh, M., M.D. Griffith & J. Parke. 2008. The marketing of gambling. In In the Pursuit of

Winning: Problem Gambling Theory, Research and Treatment. (eds) M. Zangeneh, A.

Blaszczynski & N. Turner. New York: Springer.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us