The paper 'Cultural Diversity In Entrepreneurial Teams' is a great example of a Management Assignment. The purpose of the research design and approach is to make an elaborative study over the selective issue. There are many aspects that are scrutinized under this evaluation process. The chief target of research design and approach is to make a strong analytical survey, in relation to the background and the futuristic participation of the issue for social and cultural benefits (A. C. Cooper, T. Folta, and C. Y. Woo, 1991). The basics of the research and design approach have got the dominance of making a well established analytical survey that can well determine the factors that make the subject and authenticate document for the future. The research and design as has been undertaken by Ricarda B.
Bouncken, in his ‘ Cultural Diversity in Entrepreneurial Teams: Findings of New Ventures in Germany’ is an approach towards the same objective. In this paper, the author makes an exclusive exploration over the procedures through which the entrepreneurs of different national cultures come and deal with various diversified cultural set up (Adler, N.J.
and Jelinek, M. 1986). It is the core factor that needs wide-ranged speculation for the understanding of the selected theme in terms of both past and the futuristic content and consequences related to the same. The focus is on the entrepreneurial teams that are very much involved in the whole infrastructural positioning ( Harrison, D., Kenneth, A.P. , Gavin, H.J. and Florey, A.T. 2002). There are six cases that are studied to get some of the specific results and particular solutions to the selected subject. The benefits are exclusively related to the findings of the research.
The contributions a led by Ricarda B. Bouncken, in his ‘ Cultural Diversity in Entrepreneurial Teams: Findings of New Ventures in Germany’ is in ‘ giving insights into the black box of cultural aspects of new ventures’ . As the author says the specified objective is in contributing to the management practice that gets resided on the examination of all kinds of major influences collected from diverse cultural backgrounds. These are further well analyzed for the establishment purposes on the new venture process. It is here that the selected process gets permission for the improvement of intercultural management.
The backdrop for the new venture thus gets adequate support from the six cases that are studied by Ricarda B. Bouncken. The basic benefit that this paper is going to give is to the entrepreneurs who are on the verge of or are intended to start with some kind of new business. This paper gives them exclusive information about all kinds of e pros and cons that they might face with the intercultural partners in the business. Thus the benefits of any research design and the relevant approaches are directly related to the social and the individual benefits that it provides.
There are many analytical grounding that is made a part of the whole process. The research design and approach must be of some benefit to all those people who are a part of it. As their career and life are integral to the selected theme, the research must bring in some open-eyed speculation to the same (R. H. Keeley, and R. W. Knapp, 1994). This is the vital attempt that too gets concentrate in this selected paper.
The whole methodology is approached with both theoretical and practical aspects to bring in some solutions to the hurdles that are relevant in intercultural business.
Adler, N.J. and Jelinek, M. (1986) Is ‘Organization Culture’ Culture Bound? Human Resource Management , 25(1), 73–90.
Cooper, A.C., Folta, T. and Woo, C.Y. (1991) Does Networking Pay off? A Panel Study of Entrepreneurs in the Research Triangle, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 276–90.
Dose, J.J. (1999) The Diversity of Diversity. Human Resource Management Review, 9(1), 83–108.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–50.
Fiol, M.C. (1994) Consensus, Diversity, and Learning in Organizations. Organization Science, 5(3), 403–20.
Garcia-Prieto, P., Bellard, E. and Schneider, S. (2000) A Dynamic Model of Diversity, Emotions, and Conflict in Teams. Geneva: University of Geneva.
Harrison, D., Kenneth, A.P., Gavin, H.J. and Florey, A.T. (2002) Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–45.
Hirst, G. and Mann, L. (2004) A model of R&D leadership and team communication: the relationship with project performance. R&D Management, 34(2), 147–60.
Jones, G.K. and Davis, H.J. (2000) National Culture and Innovation: Implications for Locating Global R&D Operations. Management International Review, 40(1), 11–39.
Keeley, R.H. and Knapp, R.W. (1994) Founding Conditions and Business Performance: ‘High Performers’ vs. Small vs. Venture Capital Start-ups. In College, B. (ed.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research Babson College, Boston, Mass.
Kilduff, M., Angemar, R. and Mehra, A. (2000) Top Management Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Examining the Role of Cognitions. Organization Science, 11, 11–34.
Lamb, P.W. and Liesch, P.W. (2002) The Internationalization Process of the Smaller Firms: Reframing the Relationships between Market Commitments, Knowledge and Involvement.mir Management International Review, 42(1), 7– 26.
Low, M.B. and MacMillan, I.C. (1988) Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139–61.
Mullen, B., Salas, A.T. and Driskell, J.E. (1994) Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision Making: An Integration of Tests of the Groupthink Hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25, 189–204.
Sorge, A. (1983) Book-Review – Culture’s Consequences Geert Hofstede. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(4), 625–29.