Essays on The Behavior of the Manager and Corporate Social Responsibility Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "The Behavior of the Manager and Corporate Social Responsibility" is an outstanding example of management coursework.   As the 21st century unfolds, corporate leaders, find themselves make a profit and also remain sustainable so as to continue operations in the market (Okpara & Idowu 2013). Even though sustainability is believed to have many opportunities, contemporary managers are finding sustainable leadership to be very bumpy and with many challenges. According to David & Ramus (2007), corporations across the globe are stressed with a fresh responsibility requiring them to fulfill the demands of the current generation devoid of compromising capability of the subsequent generations meeting their needs.

Current firms are required to take responsibility in their operation and how they affect the natural environment and society at large (Sacconi, et al 2010). Corporate Social responsibility has emerged has one-factor firms use to address such need as well as business ethics, stakeholder management, and corporate social performance. Based on the information, this essay will describe in a coherent manner the behavior of the manager in undertaking corporate social responsibility. Overview of Corporate Social Responsibility According to Sacconi et al. , (2010), corporate social responsibility commonly referred to as CSR is a form of corporate self-regulation incorporated into a company’ s business model in which an organization monitors and makes sure its active observance with law, ethical principles, and global norms.

In a bid to appear to be more sustainable, some companies go further than conformity and take part in "actions which involve doing social good, much more than personal company’ s interest and what is recommended by law (Idowu & Papasolomou 2007, p. 137). However, managers often find themselves in a dilemma whether to focus on making profits only or whether to also involve the company on massive corporate social responsibility.

This is a culmination that business managers currently understand that their performance will not only be evaluated based on social responsibility but also based on financial performance. Actually, some experts claim that a more profitable business is socially irresponsible and could pay no attention to most of its corporate responsibilities to the stakeholders.


Ackman, D 2002, Sherron Watkins Had Whistle But Blew It, Forbes Magazine.

Anderson, G & Orsagh, M 2004, The Corporate Governance Risk, Electric Perspectives, Vol.

29, No.1, pp. 68-75.

Arlbjørn, J. S., Warming-Rasmussen, B., Liempd, D & Mikkelsen, O 2008, A European

survey on corporate social responsibility, Kolding: Department of Entrepreneurship and

Relation Management, University of Southern Denmark.

Blanding, M 2010, The Coke Machine: The Dirty Truth Behind the World’s Favorite Soft

Drink, New York, Avery.

Business Standard 2003, Coke sales fall 11% on pesticide controversy,

Daft, R 2005, The Leadership Experience, Toronto, Southwester.

David, M. B & Ramus, C.A 2007, Including Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental

Sustainability, and Ethics in Calibrating MBA Job Preferences, Stanford Graduate School of

Business, Research Paper No. 1981.

Frederiksen, C. S 2010, The relation between policies concerning corporate social responsibility

(CSR) and philosophical moral theories—An empirical investigation, Journal of Business

Ethics, Vol.93, pp. 357–371.

Gjerris, M., Nielsen, M. E & Sandøe, P 2013, The good, the right, and the fair, London,

College Publications.

Japan Corporate News Network (JCNN) 2005, Toyota Outlines Fourth Toyota Environmental

Action Plan, Retrieved September 5 2014, from

Idowu, S & Papasolomou, I 2007, Are the corporate social responsibility matters based on

good intentions or false pretences? An empirical study of the motivations behind the issuing

of CSR reports by UK companies, Corporate Governance: The international journal of

business in society, Vol. 7, no.2, pp.136–147.

Lussier, R & Achua, C 2004, Leadership Theory, Application, Skill Development,

Minnesota, Southwestern.

Picou, A & Rubach, M.J 2006, Does good corporate governance matter to institutional investors?

Evidence from the enactment of corporate governance guidelines, Journal of Business

Ethics, Vol. 65, pp. 55-67.

Ogden, M 2014, Nike favourites to beat Adidas and Puma and remain Manchester United kit

supplier in 'billion dollar deal, The Telegraph (London).

Okpara, J.O & Idowu, S.O 2013, Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges, Opportunities

and Strategies for 21st Century Leaders, Springer.

Ramirez. G.A 2012, Sustainable development: paradoxes, misunderstandings and learning

Organizations, The Learning Organization, Vol. 19, No.1, pp. 58 -76.

Sacconi, L., Blair, M., Freeman, R & Vercelli, A 2010, Corporate social responsibility and

corporate governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Smith, J 2012, The Companies with the Best CSR Reputations, viewed on 3rd October 2014 from

Stieb, J. A 2009, Assessing Freeman’s stakeholder theory, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 87,

pp. 401–414.

Walker, M 2012, Nike's latest CSR report examines drop in emissions, labor challenges, south

Florida Business journal, viewed on 3rd October 2014 from

Wharton, K 2012, Why Companies Can No Longer Afford to Ignore Their Social

Responsibilities, viewed on 3rd October 2014 from

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us