Essays on The Way in Which Leadership Has Changed within the Context of a Globalized Environment Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "The Way in Which Leadership Has Changed within the Context of a Globalized Environment" is a great example of management coursework.   Leadership involves the creation of strategy and vision while keeping an eye on the horizon. It also involves the creation of a shared culture and vision, helping other people to grow and minimizing boundaries. Leadership also involves placing focus and emphasizing people through motivating and inspiring them. Leadership is based on personal power and therefore one has to act as a facilitator, a coach, and a servant (Barker & Coy, 2005). At most times throughout world history, people who have been seen as leaders have actually created change in numerous ways.

At most times as well, leaders have made their actions to lead to the creation of groups and eventually deciding where they should go and ensuring they are energized to overcome any challenges that may come their way. Various theories and models have been used in defining various types of leadership. While a theory refers to a structure which is created in order to explain a specific set of observations and explaining why some things happen, a model, on the other hand, is termed as being a representation which is designed with an aim of depicting the major workings of a particular concept while trying to be predictive (Cox, 1991). Leaders are Born and Not made Leadership theories include the Great man Theory, the Trait theories, the Behavioural Theories, the Contingency Theories, the Relational Theories, and the influence theories.

According to early studies, leadership was known to adopt the belief that male leaders were born and not made and therefore they were known to have been born with some specific natural abilities of influence and power and other heroic leadership qualities or traits.

In the past, leadership in social movements, the military, government, religions and in organizations was regarded as being just one “ Great Man” who was responsible for putting each and everything together and also for influencing other people basing on the strength of the inherited qualities, traits, and abilities. It was therefore ascertained that there was a big difference between leaders and followers since it was assumed that leaders were just born to become leaders!

References

Aguirre, D. (2004) Resilience Report: 10 Principles of Change Management

Barker, C. & Coy, R. (Eds). (2005). Understanding Influence for Leaders at all Levels. McGraw Hill: North Ryde, NSW (Australia).

Cox, T. (1991) Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research and Practice. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. California (USA).

Eagly, A.H., & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233-256

Edwards, M. (2004) Future Positive – International Co-operation in the 21st Century . Earthscan: London (UK).

Gill, R. (2003). Change management – or change leadership? Journal of Change Management, May (3), 4.

Herzog, P.,& Leker, J. (2011). Open and closed innovation: Different cultures for different strategies. London: Springer Science & Business Media

Larkin, J. (2008) Risk Issues and Crisis Management in Public Relations: A Casebook of Best Practice 4th ed. Kogan Page: London.

Logan, D., King, J., &Fischer-Wright, H.(2009). Tribal leadership: Leveraging natural groups to build a thriving organization. HarperCollins.

Marquis, C., &Tilcsik, A.(2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals,193–243

Northouse, P.G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and Practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Ravasi, D., Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433–458.

Ruddman, L.A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter-stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629-645.

Stanford, N. (2011). Corporate culture: Getting it right. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Swanwick, T., & McKimm, J. (2011). ABC of clinical leadership. London: John Wiley & Sons

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us