The paper 'Organizational Design of Bega Cheese" is a good example of a management case study. Organizational design plays a significant role in determining how an organization will be able to achieve its core qualities as outlined in the vision of the organization. The design is also important in terms of providing an infrastructure for deploying the business processes. The success of the organization is dependent on its design. This is considering that it outlines how the operations are carried out within the environment. The relationship between the management and the employees is also determined by the organizational design.
Different types of organizational designs are in place depending on the goals and objectives of the organization (Etzioni-Halevy, 2010). An organization can also be mechanistic or organic depending on how it carries out its operations and its structure. A mechanistic organization is mainly associated with rigid hierarchy and rules which makes it more bureaucratic. On the other hand, an organic organization is characterized by high levels of flexibility and low levels of formalities and hierarchies. Bega Cheese is the leading manufacturer of cheese in Australia and it has been in operation since 1889 (Bega Cheese, 2014).
The organizational design of the company has played a vital role in contributing to its success. The company has various manufacturing plants mainly in the rural areas and it works alongside the local people in the countryside. The public image of the company is exceptional due to its organizational design. This paper critically discusses the position of the company in terms of the mechanistic-organic continuum. Discussion Bega cheese should be positioned in the middle within the mechanistic-organic continuum.
This is because the company displays some of the characteristics of an organic organization as well as those of a mechanistic organization. The company usually produces an excess of 200,000 tonnes of carious products every year. This is an indication that the company is involved in the mass production of its products which is a characteristic of a mechanistic organization in the mechanistic-organic continuum (Mawritz, 2010). However, despite the mass production of its products, the company also emphasizes the quality of its products for the purposes of ensuring that the customers are satisfied.
Auh, S. (2010). Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. Industrial marketing management, 39(5), 820-831.
Bega Cheese. (2014). Bega Cheese tastes victory. Retrieved on 13 August 2014 from,
Etzioni-Halevy, E. (2010). Bureaucracy and democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lam, A. (2011). Innovative organizations: structure, learning and adaptation. In Paper presented at the DIME Final Conference (Vol. 6, p. 8).
Mawritz, M. B. (2014). Transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, and the moderating role of mechanistic–organic contexts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 413-433.
Schroeder, R. G. (2011). Organizational structure and continuous improvement and learning: Moderating effects of cultural endorsement of participative leadership. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(9), 1103-1120.
Jones, G. R. (2010). Organizational theory, design, and change. Pearson.
Ramezan, M. (2011). Intellectual capital and organizational organic structure in knowledge society: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 88-95.
Yang, H. J. (2011). Organization structure, competition and performance measurement systems and their joint effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 22(2), 84-104.