The paper 'How Ngai Tahu Is Designed in relation to the Major Contingency Factors " is a good example of a management case study. In the current dynamic and changing workplace in addition to the globalised economy, the effective development of organizational performance is closely associated with the development of personal knowledge, skills, performance as well as experience. On the other hand, the ability to maintain and achieve high performance and high levels of productivity in organizations and this seem to e a key challenge that is facing the management team all over the world today.
This essay sets out to offer an analysis of Ngai Tahu and in respect to these, it will deal with concepts such as the vision, mission and strategy of Ngai Tahu. This section will also discuss how Ngai Tahu is designed in relation to the major contingency factors and what the organization is able to achieve. This section will be followed by a discussion of five major recommendations aimed at improving organizational performance. The essay will conclude with a summary of the key recommendations and the manner in which they will enhance organizational performance. Analysis of Ngai Tahu Ngai Tahu Holdings is termed as a long term intergenerational New Zealand focused investor and it tends to have an active approach to matters relating to managing assets, governance and investment.
Ngai Tahu Holdings is an investment company which operates under the Ngai Tahu Charitable Trust. The framework of Ngai Tahu offers a robust methodology which acts as a tool to assist them in the delivery of the long term sustainable returns. The mission of Ngai Tahu Holdings is that it gets put to be an outstanding investment company and majors on the creation of wealth for the Ngai Tahu Whanui and at the same time respecting and contributing to the mana of Ngai Tahu in all their endeavors (Ngai Tahu Holdings, 2016).
Ngai Tahu vision and strategies revolve around the concept of the natural environment, tribal communication and participation, culture and identity, social development, governance and organizational development, education and representation and advocacy development and Papatipu Runanga development.
Ali, I., Rehman, K.U., Ali, S.I., Yousaf, J., & Zia, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility influences, employee commitment and organizational performance. African Journal of Business Management, 4(12), 2796-2801.
Bourne, M., Kennerley, M., & Franco-Santos, M. (2005). Managing through measures: A study of impact on performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(4), 373-395.
Burke, W & Litwin, G. (2001). A casual model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18(3), 523-545.
Garriga, E. &Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51-71.
Ghemawat, P. (2002). Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective. Business History Review. Harvard Business Review.
Hosmer, B.E. (2001). Foster employee customers and hold on to your best ones. Strategy and Leadership, 29(6), 34-36.
Jones, G., & George, J. (2008). Contemporary Management. New York: McGraw Hill/ Irwin.
Kvint, V. (2009). The Global Emerging Market: Strategic Management and Economics. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ngai Tahu Holdings 2016, Group Profile, http://www.ngaitahuholdings.co.nz/group-profile/
Richard et al. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice. Journal of Management.
Rumelt, Richard P. (2011). Good Strategy/Bad Strategy. United States: Crown Business