Essays on Greenfield Investment - Canada and the Philippines Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Greenfield Investment - Canada and the Philippines" is a perfect example of a business case study. In the past twenty years, foreign direct investment (FDI) has become the main source of capital inflows for both developing and developed economies. These kinds of investments are usually made by multinational companies that enter a local market either through Brownfield or Greenfield mode. Brownfield FDI refers to cross-border acquisitions and mergers. These two types of FDI have different effects on the market competition, social welfare, consumer surplus, and of the host country (Nocke & Yeaple, 2008).

Greenfield investment involves a parent company starting a new venture in a foreign country through the construction of new operational facilities beginning from the ground up. The companies create new long-term jobs in a foreign country through hiring new employees. Advantages and disadvantages of investing in both countries Advantages of Greenfield investment in the Philippines Direct foreign investment had clearly decreased in the period 2008-2009 owing to the unfavorable international economic environment; nevertheless, it started to pick up in 2010. In the year 2012, the Foreign Direct Investment influx grew by a rate of 15.5% as compared to this year.

There are advantages to investing in the Philippines. The education system churns out many graduates who offer excess skilled manpower for that economy. Filipinos speak English and thus making it easy for an Australian company to operate there. There will be a huge and cheap labor force and besides, many of the raw materials have not been exploited fully. It will be an opportunity for the Australian multinational to take advantage of the cheap labor as well as the raw materials available (Neary, 2007).

The company will be to Philippines superior technology that will enable it to attract competent and well-trained workers. Methods of production which are efficient can be invested in the Philippines as a duplication of the parent company in Australia. The Philippines has strong cultural proximity to the US hence making it easy for the Australian values to fit in.


Aizenman, J. & Marion, N., 2004, The Merits of Horizontal Versus Vertical FDI in the Presence of Uncertainty, Journal of International Economics, 62 (1): 125-141.

Anand, B. N & Khanna, T. 2000, Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 295-315.

Busse, M. & Hefeker, C., 2007, Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment, European Journal of Political Economy 23, 397-415.

Choe, J., 2003, Do Foreign Direct Investment and Gross Domestic Investment Promote Economic Growth? Review of Development Economics 7(1): 44-57.

Dorrenbacher, C., & Geppert, M., 2006, Micro-Politics and Conflicts in Multinational Corporations, Journal of International Management, 12 (3): 251-265.

Golub, S.S., 2009, Openness to Foreign Direct Investment in Services: An International Comparative Analysis, The World Economy 32 (8): 1245-1268.

Ferrett, B., 2005, Greenfield Investment versus Acquisition: Alternative Modes of Foreign Expansion, University of Nottingham GEP Research Paper 05/39.

Head, T.C. & Sorensen, PF., 2005, Attracting Foreign Direct Investment: The Potential Role of National Culture, The Journal of American Academy of Business, 6 (1): 305-308.

Hitt, A., 2009, Strategic Management Competitiveness and Globalization, Nelson Education Ltd, London.

Holger, G. 2000, Analyzing Foreign Market Entry: The Choice between Greenfield Investment and Acquisitions, Journal of Economic Studies 27(3): 165-181.

Janeba, E., 2002, Attracting FDI in a Politically Risky World, International Economic Review, 43 (4): 1127-1141.

Klemm, A. Botman, D.P.J. & Baqir, R., 2008, Investment Incentives and Effective Tax Rates in the Philippines: A Comparison With Neighboring Countries (EPub), International Monetary Fund, New York.

Mayrhofer, U., 2004. International Market Entry: Does the Home Country Affect Entry Mode Decisions, Journal of International Marketing, 12 (4): 71-88.

Meldrum, D., 2000, Country risk and foreign direct investment, Business Economics, 35(1), 33-40.

Nauro, C.F. & Nugent, J. B., 2003, Aggregate Investment and Political Instability: An Econometric Investigation, Economica, 70 (229): 533-49.

Neary, J. P., 2007, Cross-border Mergers as Instruments of Comparative Advantages, Review of Economic Studies 74: 1229–57.

Nolan, J.L., 1996, Philippines Business: The Portable Encyclopedia for Doing Business With the Philippines, World Trade Press, New York.

Nocke, V. & Yeaple, S., 2008. An Assignment Theory of Foreign Direct Investment, Review of Economic Studies, 75(2), 529-557.

Peng, M.W., 2009, Global Business, Mason: South-Western College Pub.

Petrović, E., & Stanković, J., 2009, Country risk and Effects of Foreign Direct investment, Economics and Organization 6 (1): 9-22.

Qiu, L.D. & Wang, S., 2011, FDI Policy, Greenfield Investment and cross-border mergers, Review of International Economic, 19 (50): 836-851.

Qiu, L. D. & Wen Z., 2006, International Mergers: Incentives and Welfare, Journal of International Economics, 68: 38–58

Reynolds, F., 2003, Managing Exports: navigating the complex rules, controls, barriers, and laws Age, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Savoie, D.J., 2010, Power: Where Is It? McGill-Queen's Press – MQUP, Ontario.

Schaffer, R., Agusti, F. & Earle, B., 2009, International Business Law and Its Environment, Cengage Learning, London.

Smarzynska J. B., 2004, Does FDI Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages, American Economic Review, 94(3): 605-627.

Tolentino, P.E., 2012, Technological Innovation and Third World Multinationals, Routledge, New York.

Tong, T.W. & Reuer, J. 2007, Real Options in Multinational Corporations: Organizational Challenges and Risk Implications, Journal of International Business Studies 38, 215-230.

Wong, K.P., 2006, Foreign direct Investment and Forward Hedging, Journal of Multinational Financial Management 16, 459-474.

Yeaple, S., 2009, Firm heterogeneity and the structure of U.S. Multinational activity, Journal of International Economics, 78 (2): 206-215.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us