The paper "Description of the Big Five Model of Personality, Personality Test " is an outstanding example of management coursework. Personality refers to the obscure traits that define a constant form of conduct in reaction to objects, people, and concepts in their surroundings. In this consideration, personality is an important predictor of performance in various tasks in the workplace. A certain personality predisposition may thus advantage or disadvantage an individual in fulfilling the demands of a given role. Management is a significant contributor to employee turnover in many workplaces. A positive working relationship between the leadership and an employee is a key predictor of whether an employee will remain in a company or not.
It is, therefore, critical to understanding the association between the personality of a manager and their leadership designs. Analysis of the Big Five Model of personality in relation to management practice is crucial in determining job performance. High job performance would be the exemplary executions of job tasks, as well as a high level of resourcefulness in solving problems. Description of the Big Five Model of Personality The Big Five Model of personality uses the five traits of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism as its dimensions in determining personality.
The dimensions are taken to cover the foundation for all other personalities, having been defined by research over multiple periods of examination. This tool on occasion applies in testing employees to determine their suitability to function in a group dynamic, in addition to revealing the qualities such employees bring to the group. Openness to experience refers to an individual’ s level of intellect, indicated by interest, innovation and a taste for ingenuity and choice.
Conscientiousness, on the other hand, relates to organization, dependability sense of discipline as well as the need for achievement. Energy, positive emotions, assertiveness, sociability, and talkativeness all relate to the dimension of extraversion, where an extroverted person constantly seeks incentive in association with others. Agreeableness assesses capacity for compassion and cooperation towards other people, avoiding and solving the conflict. The final dimension, neuroticism, describes the inclination to negative feelings such as anxiety and depression. Neuroticism also refers to an individual’ s impulse control and is at times known as emotional stability. Relative Strengths and Weaknesses in My Personality Profile The Big Five Model of personality test revealed differing scores on the various dimensions of personality tested.
The test ascribes a percentile on each dimension, in addition to explaining the merits and demerits of scoring either high or low in each dimension. The personality profile derived from responding to Big Five Project Personality Test indicates advantages in two dimensions, while the other three dimensions score around the median, indicating a likelihood to react in either of the ways describing the dimension. Advantages on My Personality Profile Openness to Experience A high score in this dimension reflects advantageous personality traits to management, where open persons have an active imagination, visual taste, keenness on innermost feelings as well as free judgment.
Being open to experience is crucial in a management function, where such an employee has an interest in learning new and efficient ways of executing their responsibility. Further, such leaders have a high capacity for innovation, where they have the capacity to develop new means of solving problems. Innovation is the direct result of interest shown by an individual in executing their responsibility.
Research findings indicate that openness to experience positively correlates with success in consultancy, as well as the flexibility to change. Possessing a personality that is open to experience is thus advantageous, and is suitable in the current world of management, where change is rapid. Timely adaptation to market condition is at times the difference between profitability and obsolesces.
Ahmad, J., Ather, M. R., & Hussain, M. (2014). IMPACT OF BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS ON JOB PERFORMANCE (ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AS A MEDIATOR). Humam Capital Without Borders: Knowledge and Learning for Quality of Life, 25-27.
Alkahtani, A. H., Abu-Jarad, I., Sulaiman, M., & Nikbin, D. (2011). The Impact of Personality abd Leadership Styles on Change Capabilities of Malysian Managers. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research , 1(2) 70-99.
Arora, R., & Rangnekar, S. (2015). Towards Understanding the Two-Way Interaction Effects of Extraversion and Openness to Experience on Career Commitment. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, doi:10.1007/s10775-015-9296-4.
Eswaran, S., Islam, M. A., & Yusuf, D. H. (2011). A Study of the Relationship between the Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Involvement in a Foreign Based Financial Institution in Penang . International Business Research , Vol. 4, No. 4; 164-175.
Khan, S., Amin, H., & Tahir, M. B. (2012). Impact of Personality Match/Mismatch on Employee Level Performance Which Ultimately Affects Organizational Performance. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, Volume 12 Issue 11 Version 1.0 60-68.
Lubis, L. M. (2016 ). Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behavior: Moderator Effect of Perceived Organizational Support . Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) , Vol-2, Issue-5 521-530.
Ramana, P., Sambasivanb, M., & Kumar, N. (2016). Counterproductive work behavior among frontline government employees: Role of personality, emotional intelligence, affectivity, emotional labor, and emotional exhaustion. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, Volume 32, Issue 1, 25-37.
Rothmann, S., & Coetzer, E. P. (2003). The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29 (1), 68-74.
Singh, A. P., & Pathardikar, A. D. (2010). Effect of Personality Traits and Emotional Intelligence on Leadership Effectiveness. Management Convergence, 1(1) 38-46.
Sinha, V. (2011,). The Impact of Boss Personality and Style on Employee Performance and Attitude Towards Work Place. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(3) 151-161.
Yesil, S., & Sozbilir, F. (2013). An Empirical Investigation into the Impact of Personality on Individual Innovation Behaviour in the Workplace . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 540-551.