The paper “ Price Waterhouse Coopers’ Workforce Planning” is a motivating example of the case study on human resources. Price Waterhouse Coopers Australia is focused on supporting people to achieve professional and personal goals, and consequently retaining and attracting a talented and diverse workforce. The company mission is geared towards creating an inclusive culture by responding to the changing needs of people through the use of innovative initiatives. The company focuses on creating diversity in leadership through the building and developing sponsoring skills among the partners so that they are able to share their knowledge with women in the firm (Montana & Charnov, 2008).
Organizational policies and strategies focus on providing a clear path for one to grow through his career at PwC without any problem. Operational management and organization of human resources are very important for the continuity of the organization. Recruitment, training, controlling, and directing has to be with a dynamic and strategic perspective that will ensure the growth of the organization. Attainment of the overall objective of the firm depends on daily set objectives and goals. Organizational strategies and goalsParental leave is given to primary caregivers at PwC.
All staff members with over 12 months of service have to be given parental leave which equals fourteen weeks of the total remuneration. There is a purchasable annual leave equivalent to four weeks that is granted after foregoing pro-rata remuneration in a period of above twelve months. Personal and family commitments are encouraged to be settled outside the office working hours. There is a mentoring program to assist people in the management of their work-life and flexibility (Laurentis, 2004). The progression and support of women is the main focus for the firm as well as mentoring circles has been started to a broader group.
Women mentoring circles are meant to empower the women to be performers. Mavens in the company are people who provide their understanding, time, and knowledge to colleagues.
Ayean, Z., Kanungo, R.N., Mendonea, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of Culture on Human Resource management practices: A 10-Country Comparison, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (1): 192-221.
Dessouky, M.I., Moray, N. & Kijowski, B. (1995). Taxonomy of scheduling systems as a basis for the study of strategic behavior, Human Factor, 37 (3): 443-472.
Gonzales, C. (2004). Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: Effects of time constraints and cognitive abilities, Human Factors, 46 (3): 449-460.
Harris, M.G. (2005). Managing Health Services: Concepts and Practice. Sydney: Elsevier Australia.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (2): 174-196.
Laurentis, G. (2004). Strategy and Organization of Corporate Banking. New Mexico: Springer.
Montana, P.J. & Charnov, B.H. (2008). Management, London: Barron's Educational Series.
Noble, P. & Watson, T. (2007). Evaluating Public Relations: A Best Practice Guide to Public Relations Planning, Research and Evaluation. New York: Kogan Page Publishers.
Senecal, J., Loughead, T.M., & Bloom, G.A. (2008). A seasonal-long team-building intervention: Examining the effect of team goal setting on cohesion. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30: 186-199.
Sengupta, N. & Bhattacharya, M.S. (2006). Managing Change in Organizations. Melbourne: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Stevens, D.E., & Bloom, G.A. (2003). The effect of team building on cohesion. Avante, 9 (2): 43:54.
Poterba, M.J. & Hagen, J. (1999). Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.