Essays on Organisational Structure and Performance Management in Manufacturing Organisations in China Capstone Project

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Organisational Structure and Performance Management in Manufacturing Organisations in China" is a perfect example of a business capstone project. The aim of this research is to ascertain the effect of organisational structure (OS) on performance management (PM) processes, systems and practices in an organisation. Performance management is a multifaceted process since it could focus on the performance of the company in general, employees, departments, or processes that are involved in the building of a service or product. Organisational structure the implicit and explicitly institutional regulations and policies that are aimed at providing a structure where different work roles and responsibilities can be delegated, controlled, as well as coordinated. The organisation structure (OS) will be the independent variable in this research h, while performance management (PM) would be the dependent variable.

The proposed methodology would utilise a survey, with a sample of 300 participants, who would be CEOs of Chinese manufacturing organisations. The study population would be the manufacturing industry in China. Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 1.1 Background of the study Performance management is an important process in organisations across the industry since it constitutes activities that play an important role in ensuring that goals of the organisation are being met in an effective, as well as efficient manner.

Performance management is a multifaceted process since it could focus on the performance of the company in general, employees, departments, or processes that are involved in the building of a service or product. The strategic objectives and priorities can be achieved through effective performance management processes. Organisational structure, on the other hand, constitutes the implicit and explicitly institutional regulations and policies that are aimed at providing a structure where different work roles and responsibilities can be delegated, controlled, as well as coordinated.

It defines the departmental structure, supervisory relationships, and the workflow within a company. It is also the way power and responsibility are allocated inside the organisation, as well as how to work procedures are carried out by the members of the organisation. This research proposes a critical examination of the various effects and relationships between organisational structure and performance management in the manufacturing sector. Performance management, according to Bogicevic & Janicijevic (2009), plays a key role in the efficiency and effectiveness in any organisation, and more so in a manufacturing organisation.

This has attracted significant interest from researchers, who have investigated the various roles of this variable in the overall organisational success. The vitality of this variable in businesses and firms led to more varied investigations on the various variables that might affect organisational success both directly and indirectly, and in that respect, researchers such as Connaway & Powell (2010) among others attempted to ascertain how organisational structure might affect or relate with performance management.

Gavrea, Ilie & Stegerean (2011) defines organisation structure as the anatomy of a business or an organisation since it provides the foundation and the footing within which the company functions, and according to this author, its effect on the organisation members is significant. Performance management according to Karami, Dolatabadi & Rajaeepour (2013) involves managing employee and system performances, and this facilitates the effective delivery of operational and strategic goals, which according to this researcher, have an immediate and clear correlation between using performance management systems or programs and improved business and organisational results in general.

The fact that performance management is clearly an important process in any organisation implies that factors that affect this process are also of significance to the organisation and thus, must be focussed on, and such factors include organisational structure.

References

Adams, R., & mehran, H. (2015). Corporate Performance, Board Structure, and Their Determinants in the Banking Industry. Federal Reserve Bank Of New York Staff Reports, 3(2), 12-34.

Armstrong, M. (2009). The Process of Performance Management. in M. Armstrong, A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, pp.617-638

Armstrong, M. and Baron, A. (1998) Performance Management: The New Realistic, London: Institute of Personnel and Development

Armstrong, M. and Baron, A. (2005) Managing Performance: Performance Management in Action, London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development

Bach, S. (2004) Employment Relations and the Health Service: the Management of Reforms, London: Routledge

Bogicevic-Milikic, B., & Janicijevic, N. (2009). Cultural divergence and performance evaluation systems: A comparative study of three Serbian companies. Ekon. An., 54(180), 40-55. doi:10.2298/eka0980040b

Bolton, S. and Houlihan, M. (eds.) (2007) Searching for the Human in Human Resource Management, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Carter, R., Danford, A., Howcroft, D., Richardson, H., Smith, A. and Taylor, P. (2013 forthcoming). Stressed out of my box’: Employee experience of lean working and occupational ill-health in clerical work in the UK public sector. Work, Employment and Society, 27.

Chen, Injazz J., & Paulraj, Antony. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measure¬ments. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 119-150.

Connaway, L., & Powell, R. (2010). Basic research methods for librarians. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Libraries Unlimited.

Flynn, B.B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. (2010). The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and con¬figuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 58-71.

Gavrea, C., Ilie Ş, L., & Stegerean, R. (2011). Determinants of Organizational Performance: The Case of Romania, 6(2), 285-300.

Germain, R. (1996). The role of context and structure in radi¬cal and incremental logistics innovation adoption. Journal of Business Research, 35, 117-127.

Gerwin, D., & Kolodny, H. (1992). Management of advanced manu¬facturing technology: Strategy, organization, and innovation. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

Guerci, M., Radaelli, G., Siletti, E., Cirella, S., & Rami Shani, ,A.B. (2015). The impact of human resource management practices and corporate sustainability on organizational ethical climates: An employee perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(2), 325-342.

Harland, Christine M., Lamming, Richard C., & Cousins, Paul D. (1999). Developing the concept of supply strategy. Inter¬national Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(7), 650-669.

Ifinedo, P., & Olsen, D. (2014). An Empirical Research on the Impacts of organizational decisions’ locus,tasks structure rules, knowledge, and IT function’s value on ERP system success. International Journal Of Production Research, 1-15. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.991047.

Karami, A., Dolatabadi, H. R., & Rajaeepour, S. (2013). Analyzing the effectiveness of reward management system on employee performance through the mediating role of employee motivation case study: Isfahan regional electric company. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(9), 327-338.

Ketchen, David J. Jr., & Hult, G. Thomas M. (2007). Bridging or¬ganization theory and supply chain management: The case of the best value supply chains. Journal of Operations Manage¬ment, 25, 455-458.

Kim, H. S. (2005). Organizational structure and internal communica¬tion as antecedents of employee-organization relationships in the context of organizational justice: A multilevel analysis. Unpub¬lished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maryland. College Park.

Koufteros, X.A., Nahm, A.Y., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, K. (2007). An empirical assessment of a nomological network of organi¬zational design constructs: From culture to structure to pull production to performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 468-492.

Krause, Daniel R., Handfeld, Robert B., & Tyler, B.B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement Journal of Operations Management, 25, 528-545.

Lai, H. (2012). Study on Influence of Employee Promotion System on Organizational Performance. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online), 5(1), 231-251.

Locke, E. A. (2009). Handbook of principles of organizational behavior: Indispensable knowledge for evidence-based management. Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Marshall, J., & Steeves, L. E. (2008). Improving accountability models in public education: Applying logic models of performance management. Regina, Sask: Saskatchewan Institute of Public Policy.

Mukhtar, S. A. (2013). Organizational Conflict Management Strategies on Employee Job Satisfaction: A Conceptual Relationship. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews, 3(5), 2855-2862.

Naong, M. N. (2012). The impact of management indecisiveness on employee motivation and performance. African Journal of Business Management, 6(9), 3274-3281.

Nura, A. A., & Osman, N. H. (2013). Gauging the effect of performance management and technology based human resource management on employee retention: The perspective of academics in higher educational institutions in Sokoto state Nigeria. Asian Social Science, 9(15), 295-304.

Paulraj, A., & Chen, I.J. (2007). Strategic buyer-supplier relation¬ships, information technology and external logistics integra¬tion. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 43(2), 2-14.

Peoplestreme.com. (2015). Explain What is Employee Performance Management ?. Retrieved 29 April 2015, from http://www.peoplestreme.com/what-is-performance-management.shtml

Radnor, Z. and Bucci, G. (2007) Evaluation of Pacesetter Within HMRC Processing, HMRC, London.

Ruekert, R.W., Walker, O.C. Jr., & Roering, K.J. (1985). The or¬ganization of marketing activities: A contingency theory of structure and performance. Journal of Marketing, 49, 13-25.

Ruiz Jiménez, M., Vallejo Martos, M., & Martinez Jiménez, R. (2013). Organizational Harmony as a Value in Family Businesses and Its Influence on Performance. Journal Of Business Ethics, 126(2), 259-272. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1941-6.

Sa, Y. (2013). Elements of strategic management process and performance management systems in U.S. federal agencies: Do employee managerial levels matter? International Journal of Business and Management, 8(9), 1-13.

Santos, N. d. M., Bronzo, M., de Oliveira, M.,Paulo Valadares, & de Resende, P.,Tarso Vilela. (2014). Organizational culture, organizational structure and human resource management as bases for business process orientation and their impacts on organizational performance. Brazilian Business Review, 11(3), 100-122.

Slavkovic, M., & Babic, V. (2013). Knowledge management, innovativeness, and organizational performance: Evidence from Serbia. Ekon An, 58(199), 85-107. doi:10.2298/eka1399085s.

Theron, M. (2011). 10 Reasons Why Performance Management Fails and how to remedy them – Regenesys. Regenesys. Retrieved 30 April 2015, from http://regenesys.co.za/2011/03/10-reasons-why-performance-management-fails-and-how-to-remedy-them/

Torrington, D., Hall., L. and Taylor, S. and Atkinson, C. (2011). Employee Performance Management in Human Resource Management (8th edition), London: Prentice Hall, pp.263-286.

Van der Voet, J. (2014). The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public Organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure. European Management Journal, 32(3), 373-382. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.10.001

Walton, R.E. (1985). From control to commitment: Transforming workforce management in the united states. In K. Clark, R. Hayes & C. Lorenz (Eds.), The uneasy alliance: Management the productivity-technology dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Wilson, F. (2002). Dilemmas of appraisal. European Management Journal, 20.6: 620-629

Wolff, C. (2008) Managing Employee Performance, IRS Employment Review, no. 890: 1-12

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us