The paper “ Organizational Sustainability and Ethics” is a spectacular variant of literature review on management. The idea of sustainability emerged back in the early 1970s as stated by Edwards. Currently, a number of groups and entities who have since embraced the motto are incredibly broad, including universities, non-profit making organizations, local communities, and even industrial firms. Edwards (2005) claims that in general, businesses or institutions which claim they work towards sustainability normally intend to combine values of environmental responsibility, economic viability, and social equity. Since sustainability continues into the mainstream, the majorly amorphous idea bent into numerous dissimilar shapes.
The form of descriptions it takes in itself shows the paradox nature of sustainability. Therefore, this essay discusses the claim that sustainability is a paradox. To put this essay into perspective, the paper will define the term sustainability. As stated before, the term ‘ sustainability’ holds numerous meanings. According to Ramirez (2012, p. 59), it normally means the capability of a business to maintain its fundamental nature for a long time by means of its own endeavors. Sustainability is said to be a paradox because it is both good and at the same time bad for an organization and society as a whole.
In this essay, sustainability means sustaining the growth and competitive advantages of an organization over time. Sustainability builds and upholds the circumstances where organization and human can survive in a productive way, that enable satisfying the economic, social and other factors of current and future generations (Ramirez, 2012, p. 59). Economic growth is paradoxical in nature of economic and sustainability, to some extent, a planetary effort to resolve the paradox of attempting to balance the encouraging impacts of economic expansion on employment, quality of life and poverty with the detrimental impacts that economic growth can have on environment and the direct social needs according to Smith & Sharicz (2011, p. 73). Ramirez (2012, p. 64) state that the paradox opinion is anchored in the notion that in each single component of certainty, there exist contrasting factors whose disagreement turns into a particular and new aspect that will then turn new divergent factors and, preserving some of the attributes of the initial circumstances, will show path-dependent characteristics.
Paradoxes are always present all over in organizations and management; are specific and concrete, and used in the stock management in balancing costs of purchasing and holding stocks (Smith & Sharicz 2011, p. 76). Even though sustainability is important to remain relevant and popular among customers, sometimes it defies ethics and moral principles which drive society. Major reports have been documented to analyze and give opinions concerning sustainability. One such report is the Bruntland Report of 1987. The report holds that sustainable development within the company should be one that satisfies the present needs of the society, but not compromising the capability of the coming generations to satisfy their needs and wants as argued by Ramirez (2012, p. 59).
This report emphasized the plight of the poor, and the environmental constraints to offer for current and potential needs. The report also focused the global issues over the outcomes of limited accessibility of natural resources so as to satisfy the world’ s population needs which keep on increasing as the years unfold (Ramirez, 2012, p. 59).