Essays on Is UK Supermarket Sector an Oligopoly Literature review

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Is UK Supermarket Sector an Oligopoly? ” is a well-turned example of the literature review on business. Markets act as a controlling agent across every economy. This is because they control how we spend, prices of goods as well as controlling entry and exit into the market. The market structure enables an organization to determine its prices, output, and the number of profits the business might get. The above study evaluates the statement which shows that the UK supermarket industry is an oligopoly. There are four major market structures that include perfect competition, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly, and finally the monopoly market structure.

The perfect competition market is one that is comprised of many buyers and sellers who trade similar goods. These do not have much effect on the price prevailing in the market since there are a large number of firms operating in this market (Aumann 1994, pp. 39-50). Customers do not choose what to buy since the products are similar. In order to survive in this market, two factors are important which include having perfect knowledge and perfect mobility about every product.

Perfect knowledge involves having a wider view of the economic opportunities available. Clifton (2007, pp. 137-151) describes that perfect mobility is having a motive if changing an opportunity into a benefit. The monopolistic competition is a market structure that involves many buyers and sellers. These sell their goods at varying prices. This difference in price occurs as a result of the presence of differentiated goods. Some of these differences appear in customer segmentation, the use of varieties of branding and advertising. A monopoly is the type of industry that produces products with no close substitutes.

This market is also characterized by a few barriers of entry and exit in which other people find it difficult to compete with the firm. Frank (2002) shows that one example is the City cell which had specialized in the production of mobile services in Bangladesh. The company was the first to offer these services and enjoyed the benefits of monopoly until the time Grameen phone was introduced as a competitor. An oligopoly type of market is characterized by a few suppliers. Firms operating take a large percentage of market concentration and produce branded products.

References

Arrow, K 2000, Toward a theory of price adjustment, The allocation of economic resources, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 41–51.

Aumann, R 1994, Markets with a continuum of traders, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 39–50.

Clifton, J 2007, Competition and the evolution of the capitalist mode of production, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 137–151.

Colander, D 2008, Microeconomics, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Frank, R 2002, Microeconomics and behavior, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

Garegnani, P 2000, Classical versus marginalist analysis, Routledge, London, pp. 40-112.

Goodman, N & Weisskopf, A 2009, Microeconomics in context economics, 4th ed., p. 109.

Heinz, D & Neri, S 1995, Theory of production, A long-period analysis, Cambridge University Press, London.

Kirzner, I 1999, The Austrian perspective on the crisis, The crisis in economic theory, Basic Books, New York, pp. 11–38.

Kreps, D 2000, A course in microeconomic theory, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.

Lee, F 2008, Post-Keynesian price theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mas-Colell, A Michael, D & Green, J 2005, Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 315.

McNulty, P 1997, A note on the history of perfect competition, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 395–399

Melvin & Boyes 2002, Microeconomics, 5th ed. Houghton Mifflin, Michigan, p. 267.

Novshek, W & Sonnenschein, H 1997, General equilibrium with free entry, A synthetic approach to the theory of perfect competition, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 128–130.

Perloff, J 2008, Microeconomics theory & applications with calculus, Pearson, London, p. 445.

Petri, F 2004, General equilibrium, capital and macroeconomics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Pindyck, R & Rubinfeld, D 2001, Microeconomics, 5th ed. Prentice-Hall, California, p. 446.

Robert, J 1996, Existence of competitive equilibrium in markets with a continuum of traders, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1-17.

Roberts, J & Sonnenschein, H 1997, On the foundations of the theory of monopolistic competition", The Econometric Society, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 101–113.

Roberts, J 1997, Perfectly and imperfectly competitive markets, The New Palgrave, A dictionary of Economics, vol. 3, pp. 41-837.

Rupal, J 2010, What is an oligopolistic market? Atharva Institute of Management Studies, Mumbai.

Samuelson, W & Marks, S 2003, Managerial economics, 4th ed. Wiley, Sydney, p. 403.

Steve, K 2001, Debunking economics, The naked emperor of the social cciences, Pluto Press Australia, Melbourne.

Vela, K 2009, Uncomputability and undecidability in economic theory, Applied mathematics and computation, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 61–113.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us