Essays on Theory and Practice of Leadership Assignment

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper 'Theory and Practice of Leadership' is a perfect example of a Management Assignment. In defining leadership at the inception of this report, Penny (2008) states that the inter-personal five bases of power suggest that the capability of manipulating other people’ s behaviors is referred to as power, where the attempts of an individual to affect the behavior of a group without applying the coercive form of power. And Prosser (2010) posits that leadership is the attempt to influence the activity of followers through the communication process and towards the attainment of some goals. One of the most vital leadership roles that have emerged in the modern workplace is the role of facilitation.

The managers are successfully responding to these changes since the roles of mastering the facilitation duties have helped the managers and leaders and the workplace is also rapidly changing as never before. In the face of such kinds of changes, the groups, individuals, or even the whole organization can get their work done by the help of effective and efficient facilitators. The current workplace has evolved, and the organizations are being forced to reconfigure themselves so that they can remain competitive and vibrant by the rapid technology deployment and the unprecedented global competition.

One of the numerous ways that organizations have been deploying to meet these kinds of challenges is by practicing restructuring (Fox 2006). The frequency and the extent at which these restructuring have been happening is new, even though the restructuring in itself is not a new trend. Almost everyone who works in either the private or even the public sector has been affected by the organizational restructuring or of its variations such as downsizing, right-sizing, reengineering, etc. Leaders have got fewer resources to get the job done and more responsibilities to tackle.

They also deal with numerous amounts of information while the workplace is more furious and even faster. Despite all these challenges, managers who do more than surviving in the environment understand the science and art of facilitation and hence thrive. They assist their groups to get their jobs accomplished in innovative and new ways by applying their facilitation skills. The leaders who are getting buried are the ones who have failed to learn facilitation skills.

Moreover, when there is so little or so much in carrying out their responsibilities, the managers’ traditional “ direct and control” approach to managing just does not work. Additional products and services are being marketed at the global markets by many companies. Therefore the way the process of these companies is operating is being changed by the increasing demand of their customers since the leaders have got increasing demands and more customers to satisfy in the global market place. Moreover, the organizations that are performing well in the global marketplace are the ones with managers who are very skilled facilitators. Why ‘ leadership’ is such a major issue in modern workplaces The ability to work with other people, especially in the leadership and motivational capacity is conceivably the most significant element of the modern leaders (Saiyadain 2003).

Mounting a strong interpersonal relationship is at a first-rate. Murray & Grant (2006) argues that ‘ the approach, cheerfulness, manner, and personality of the service provider are important parts of the service. He further adds that modern organizations are in the service sector that places a strong emphasis on meeting and identifying the requirements of the customers in face-to-face situations.



McLaughlin, K 2008, Microsoft Splits Platforms & Services Division As Online Chief Departs. Microsoft Corporation: USA.

Rogger, G 2011, Theory and Practice of Leadership. Sage Publications Pvt Ltd.: London LC1Y 1SP.

Prosser, S 2010, Effective people: leadership and organisation development in healthcare, (2nd Ed). Radcliff Publishing Ltd: Oxford OX14 1AA, United, Kingdom.

Fox, W 2006, Managing Organisational Behaviour. Juta & Co: Cape Town, South Africa.

Saiyadain, R 2003, Organisational Behaviour. Tata McGraw-Hill Company Limited: New Delhi, India.

Murray, P & Grant, DP 2006, Contemporary Issues in Management and Organisational Behaviour. Thomson: Unite Kingdom.

Mullins, LJ 2007, Management and organisational behaviour, (8th Ed). Pearson Education Limited: England.

Ranganayakulu, KCS 2005, Organisational Behaviour. Atlantic Publishers & Distributers: New Delhi, India.

Penny, K 2008, Implicit Leadership Theories: Perceptions of Charisma, People, and Performance. ProQuest LLC: 789 East Elsenhower Parkway.

Don, H &, Slocum, JW 2009 Organizational Behaviour. Cengage Learning: Natop Boulvard

Griffin, RW & Gregory, M 2012, Organizational Behaviour. Cengage Learning: Natop Boulevard

Robert, N L 2012, Management Fundamentals: Concepts, Applications, Skill Development, Cengage Learning: Natop Boulvard

Champoux, JE 2011, Organizational Behaviour: Integrating Individuals, Groups, and Organizations. Routledge: Mdison Avenue, Ney York, NY 10016.

Frank J L 2010, Work in the 21st Century: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational psychology, (3rd Ed). Blackwell Publishing Ltd: USA.

Brown, W, Bryson, A & Forth, J 2009, The Evolution of the Modern Workplace. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Murray EJ 2007 (Eds) Knowledge Management in Modern Organizations. Idea group Inc.: London.

Schilling, SJ 2011, ‘implicit leadership theories: think leader, think effective?’, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 20, No. 2, Publisher: Sage, pp.: 141-150. Viewed 26th April 2013, DOI: 10.1177/1056492610375989.

George, G., Jens, R & Kathrin, H 2010, ‘Issues in operationalizing and comparing leadership construct’, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 563-575. Viewed 25th April 2013, Elsevier Inc., DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.016.

Ming-yi, W 2006, ‘Compare Participative Leadership Theories in Three Cultures’, Compare A Journal Of Comparative Education, Vol.2, No. 3, pp. 19-30.

xxxWashington, RR 2007, ‘Empirical Relationships between Theories of Servant, Transformational, And Transactional Leadership’, Academy of Management Proceedings,

Pp.1-6. Viewed 29th April 2013, Academy of Management, DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26509311

Dion, M 2012, ‘Are ethical theories relevant for ethical leadership?’, Leadership Organization Development Journal, Vol. 33, No.1, pp.4-24.

Svennevig, J 2008, ‘Exploring Leadership Conversations’, Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp.529-536. Viewed 28th April 2013, DOI: 10.1177/0893318907313717.

Bruce, JA, Fred, OW. & Weber, TJ 2009, ‘Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future’,Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.60, pp. 421-49.

Lathalavanya, B & Thenmozhi, R 2011, ‘Organizational Citizenship Behaviour Evaluating Organizational Efficiency and Success through Knowledge sharing’, Journal of Contemporary Management Research, Vol. 5, No.1, pp.24-29.

Darren, T & Cho, J 2010, ‘Organizational identification and perceived organizational support as mediators of the procedural justice-citizenship behaviour relationship: A cross-cultural constructive replication’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,

No. 906706830, pp. 1-1. Viewed 28th April 2013, Psychology Press, DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2010.487363.

Hatice, N & Tugba,KÖ 2011, ‘Positive Organizational Behavior Variables And The Effects Of Boredom Proneness On Perceived Organizational Support’, International Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.15, No. 4, pp.133-140.

Walonick, DS 2011, ‘Organizational Theory and Behaviour’, Research In Organizational Behaviour, Vol.16, No.7, pp 1-13.

Robbins, Sp & Judge, TA 2007, ‘Organizational Behaviour’, Source, Vol. 21, No.4,pp. 115-134.

Duncan, WJ 2006, ‘Organizational Behaviour 1: Essential Theories of Motivation and Leadership/Organizational Behaviour 2: Essential Theories of Process and Structure/Organizational Behaviour 3: Historical Origins, Theoretical Foundations, and the Future’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1102-1108. Viewed 29th April 2013, Academy of Management,, PubMed. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2006.22529155.

Sun, LY 2009, ‘Market Orientation, Entrepreneurship Behaviour, and Organizational Performance: Test of a Structural Contingency Model’, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol.18, No. 2, pp. 274-285.

Vallett, CM 2010, ‘Exploring the Relationship between Organizational Virtuousness and Culture in Continuing Higher Education’, The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, Vol. 58, No.3, pp.130-142. DOI: 10.1080/07377363.2010.491772.

Jiang, X & Qingye, F 2011, ‘Relationship between Universities Organizational Culture, Teachers' Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour’,

2011 Fourth International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization,

Available from 2011 Fourth International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization, pp. 699-703, Viewed 30th April 2013, IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/CSO.2011.217.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us