Essays on Organizational Behavior from the Perspective of the Importance of Teamwork Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Organizational Behavior from the Perspective of the Importance of Teamwork" is a perfect example of management coursework.   Teamwork is a concept considered by most organizations and that deal with operations and involvement in between resources. Work teams and workgroups related to the behavioral and psychological orientation of an employee within the workplace. The dimensions behind workgroups and work teams are a key factor in determining the success of every organization by shaping the organization’ s culture and behavior, thus influencing productivity (Belanger, et al, 2003). Additionally, work teams and workgroups bring about certain benefits to an organization that may include employee motivation among others.

However, there are also certain differences between workgroups and work teams as even though they both enhance the productivity of an organization. Finally, the effectiveness of every work team and workgroups depend on the synergy created within it. Thus, this paper seeks to critically analyze organizational behavior from the perspective of the importance of teamwork, creating synergy in work teams, and addressing the difference between workgroups and work teams. Importance of Teamwork The importance of workgroups and work teams in an organization has become a major focus in the current business world.

For the past few years, organizations realized that the evolution from individual-oriented engagement to teamwork approach is a priority in current time. The reality behind the concept is that organization's operations are accomplished effectively through teamwork. The following are some of the benefits of teamwork that most organizations enjoy. Industrial harmony Work teams play an important in encouraging employees to present results of problem analysis to the organizational management for review and approval of the preferred solutions.

This structural face offers room for improved labour-management and interactions. This implies that work teams encourage employees to work closely with the management and thus creating a close relationship between employees and management (Moon, et al, 2004). Such relationships enable organizations to have an improved level of industrial harmony that organizations without proper team structures. Good leadership Effective leadership that comes with teamwork is one of the most important components that most organizations realize. Effective teamwork should ensure that there is an effective leader to realize high productivity (Parris, 2003). This implies that the leader should possess good leadership skills in order to motivate followers, create, and maintain a positive working environment and thus create a positive workforce that is highly committed.

The eventual result is the creation of high morale and highly valued employees since work teams have shared leadership roles. Clear communication The benefit of good teamwork is the realization of good communication within an organization. In essence, good communication across all levels of production ensures effective production and thus increasing and the organization’ s profitability. Additionally, good communication within a team facilitates the sharing of information and ideas (Parris, 2003).

Finally, various benefits come with an effective communication process within an organization. Such benefits include effective sharing of information, reducing information distortion. Establishing roles Creating good teamwork within an organization ensures that there is a clear role definition and thus eliminating confusion on who performs certain tasks within the organization. This will also increase the level of responsibility among individuals since the team leader can reward good performers within the group and thus general commitment towards the achievement of certain objectives (Belanger, et al, 2003). Therefore, work team formation ensures that roles and responsibilities are clearly defined to avoid job duplication and define individual accountability.

Reference

List

Batt, R 2004, Who benefits from teams? Comparing workers, supervisors, and managers,

Industrial Relations, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 183–212.

Belanger, J., Edwards, P & Wright, M 2003, Commitment at work and independence from

management: A study of advanced team working, Work and Occupations, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 234-252.

Costa, C 2003, Work team trust and effectiveness, Personnel Review, vol. 32, no. 5, p. 605-423.

Friedman, W & Casner-Lotto, J 2002, The power of teamwork, Worklife Report, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 8-9.

Glassop, L 2002, The organizational benefits of teams, Human Relations, vol. 55, no. 2, p. 225- 249

Jon, R & Douglas, K 2006, The Wisdom of Teams-Creating the High Performance

Organization, Collins Business Essentials.

Kozlowski, S & Bell, B 2003, Work groups and teams in organizations. In W.C.

Borman, D.R. Ilgen, & R Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology, London, Wiley.

LePine, J 2003, Team adaptation and post change performance: Effects of team composition

in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 1, p. 27–39.

Moon, H., Hollenbeck, J., Humphrey, S., Ilgen, D., West, B., Ellis, A & Porter,

C 2004, Asymmetric adaptability: Dynamic team structures as one-way streets, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 47, p. 681–695.

Parris, M 2003, Work teams: Perceptions of a ready-made support system? Employee

Responsibilities and Rights Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 71-83.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us