The paper "Organizational Theory at Royal Dutch Shell" is a good example of a business article. Organizations are in a manner of speaking a gathering of people working together with the intention of achieving some type of premeditated goal. It is the study of how an individual or a group of individuals behave in an organizational environment best describes what Organizational Theory is all about. Although there are various theories that have many perspectives by which they can be categorized, yet it seems in some way they are all closely tied to one’ s philosophical viewpoints. Every society which is known to modern man appears to possess some kind or type of organization.
Seen closely, an organization can be considered as a set of mechanisms that are used for achieving certain goals. These goals are achieved through a controlled and co-ordinate effort of human activities and figurative or physical resources. However, organizations are not easy to understand or to explain. This complexity has been increasing as societies and organizations are becoming more modern. Accordingly, one seeks the help of organizational theories to simplify the concept or idea of the organization itself. This OM 8010 course project will seek to explain the perspectives of Organizational Theory with the focus on a major multinational company. This course project will analyze, investigate, and identify Royal Dutch Shell from the standpoint of modernism and symbolic interpretivism.
In addition, the assignment will include various philosophical viewpoints (epistemology and ontology). Additionally, this course project will evaluate the use of Organizational Theory within the inner workings of Royal Dutch Shell by comparing and contrasting the two perspectives. This course assignment aspires to correlate the theory with practice- ‘ this is all very well in theory, but how will it work in practice. This assignment on Organizational Theory will assist me in developing a real understanding learning how to analyze various complicated situations and develop an effective means for dealing with them in any kind of organization in the world of business.
Annual Reports of the Shell Transport and Trading Company and the Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, 2007
Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Boulding, Kenneth E. (1956). General systems theory—The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2: 197–208.
Burns, Tom, and Stalker, G. M. (1961/1995). The management of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
C. A. J. Herkstroter (1995), “Right for the times and right for Shell,” Speech delivered in London, March 29, 1995
Emery, Fredrick (1960) (ed.). Systems thinking. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin.
Gadamer, Han-Georg (1994). Truth and method (second revised edn., translation revised by J. Weinsheimer and D. Marshall). New York: Continuum (originally published as Wahrheit and Methode.by J. C. B. Mohr/Paul Siebeck, Tubingen, 1960).
Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Goffman, Erving (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
Hassard, John (1988). Overcoming hermeticism in organization theory: An alternative to paradigm incommensurability. Human Relations, 41/3: 247–59.
Lawrence, P. R., and Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12:1–47.
March, James G., and Simon, Herbert (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
Martin, Joanne (1992). Cultures in organizations: Three perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
R. Cibin and R. M. Grant (December 1996), “Restructuring among the world’s largest oil majors,” British Journal of Management.
Schütz, Alfred (1967). The phenomenology of the social world (trans. G. Walsh and F. Lehnert). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press (first published in 1932).
Scott, W. Richard (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (3rd edn.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Thompson, James (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Trist, Eric, and Bamforth, Kenneth W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the long-wall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4: 3–38.
Weick, Karl E. (1979 ). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Why is the world’s most profitable company turning itself inside out?” Fortune, August 4, 2007, pp. 121