Essays on The USA Global Power History Case Study

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "The USA Global Power History" is an outstanding example of a business case study.   Unipolar defines a state when one country has and exercises more power in relation to military influence, economic and cultural influence. Bipolar, on the other hand, defines when two major states or countries have the majority of the military, cultural and economic power. On the other hand, the multipolar defines when more than two countries exercise the major power in terms of the economic, cultural and military capacity. The report will analyze whether, by 2050, the USA will be a unipolar, bipolar or multipolar country. USA Global Power History Power capability is identified as the greater size a country has in terms of political stability, military influence, economic power, resource endowment, and territory size among other variables.

These factors define the social, economic, military and political influence of a country on a global scale. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, the USA became the only superpower country in terms of the highest population and geography. The country has always had the highest GDP, where it still remains the largest economy to date (Dunne, 2000).

The economic condition of the country based on the capitalist free market, the high imports and exports among other large resources that led to the high standards of living in the country. Thus, the country has a high economic position, which gives it a major unipolar power in terms of economic conditions (Wohlforth, 1999). In terms of political stability, the country has strong stability based on the capitalist federation. It also has always had strong foreign relations, which support the power of the company (Spruyt, 2008).

On the other hand, in terms of military influence, the USA has always had the largest navy, higher than all the rest navies in the world. It also has the highest air force and army among other military based in different parts of the world. The country also has the richest cultural tradition in the world in terms of fashion, art, cuisine, music and literature among many others (Schlesinger, 2005). The USA has always since the 1991s remained to be the sole unipolar country based on the power it has had in terms of economic power, cultural and technological influence and the ideological and diplomatic capabilities of the world.

Though the USA has remained as the sole superpower country, with advances in the world based on technological among others, it is a unipolar country, though many reject the conception. That is; many would prefer to perceive it as a uni-multipolar country (Lake, 1993). That stipulates that even though the country is a unipolar country, other multipolar countries are important and play major roles in influencing the role of the unipolar country.

The USA global power is, therefore, characterized as the primacy country with the highest power among other multipolar countries (Brooks & Wohlforth, 2002). Thus, there is a key potential for other superpowers in the country, due to the possibility of increasing growth in military strength and another economic potential mainly in China.


Bilgin, P. et al., 2010. GLOBAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY. 1 ed. New York: EOLSS Publications.

Brooks, S. G. & Wohlforth, W. C., 2002. American primacy in perspective. Foreign Affairs , pp. 20-23.

Charles, L. M., 1984. The Marshall Plan: The launching of the pax americana. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Dunne, M., 2000. US foreign relations in the twentieth century: from world power to global hegemony. International Affairs, 76(1), pp. 25-40.

Ikenberry, G. J., Mastanduno, M. & Wohlforth, W. C., 2009. Unipolarity, state behavior, and systemic consequences. World Politics, 61(01), p. 127.

Lake, D. A., 1993. Leadership, hegemony, and the international economy: Naked emperor or tattered monarch with potential?. International Studies Quarterly, 37(4), pp. 459 - 489.

Lundberg, B. D., 2013. Is US Primacy Durable in an Aian Century?. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Global Studies, 7(4), pp. 13-27.

Mastanduno, M., 2009. ystem Maker and Privilege Taker: U.S. Power and the International Political Economy. World Politics, 61(1), pp. 121-154.

Murphy, G., 2005. Hemispheric Imaginings: The Monroe Doctrine and Narratives of US Empire. New York: Duke University Press.

MW, 2017. Market Watch: The absolute dominance of the U.S. economy, in one chart. [Online]

Available at:

[Accessed 7 6 2017].

Perkins, D., 1995. A history of the Monroe Doctrine. 17 ed. Boston: Little Brown.

Schlesinger, A., 2005. The American empire? Not so fast. World Policy Journal, 22(1), pp. 43-46.

Simmons, A. H., 2007. The Marshall Plan & European Unification. Political Science 3515: European Political Systems, pp. 1-15.

Spruyt, H., 2008. American Empire” as an Analytic Question or a Rhetorical Move?. International Studies Perspectives, 9(3), pp. 290-299.

Stephanson, A., 1996. Manifest destiny: American expansion and the empire of right. New York: Hill and Wang.

Stiglitz, J., 2015. The great divide. UK: Penguin Publishers.

TE, 2017. Trading Economics: Unites States Gross National Product. [Online]

Available at:

[Accessed 7 6 2017].

Willige, A., 2016. World Economic Forum: The World's Top Economy: The US vs China in Five Charts. [Online]

Available at:

[Accessed 9 6 2017].

Wohlforth, W. C., 1999. The stability of a unipolar world. International security, 24(1), pp. 5-41.

Writer, S., 2016. Comparisons of World Militay Strengths Results. Military Power Comparison Results for the United States of America vs. China. [Online]

Available at:

[Accessed 9 6 2017].

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us