The paper 'The Aspect of Drugs Testing Within the Workplace' is a great example of a Management Case Study. The purpose of this paper is to examine the aspect of the drug testing process within the workplace and find out its effectiveness and efficiency in the current operational environments. The discussion has indicated that the drug testing process is both beneficial but most expensive due to its implementation costs. Therefore, it is recommended that organizations should devise other cost-effective strategies like pre-employment analysis of potential applicants before embarking on the actual exercise. The paper also notes that drug testing programs should put the welfare of the employees first in order to prevent possible legal risks that can include compensation claims.
The exercise should not be adopted by organizations as a way of countering possible liabilities but the main objective should be to create a safe operational environment. IntroductionThe recently reported increases in the level of personnel failing pre-employment drug tests mean that the existing operational drug testing policies continue to be improved on a daily basis to tackle possible rogue employees.
Employers enjoy the capacity to alter their drug testing policies whenever they perceive its importance. In fact, they are allowed to introduce the policy even in cases where there is constant opposition from the employees (Harrop, 2015). However, the employer is called upon to always come up with drug testing policies that are deemed reasonable and fairly relate to the employees through the provision of education on its requirements before the implementation process. Notwithstanding, research indicates that the current need for drug testing is more sensitive and sharp than ever for purpose of ensuring that the sustenance of a safe workplace especially because of the fairly-documented course in relation to prescription and opioid use.
Thus, the purpose of this paper is to examine the aspect of the drug testing process within the workplace and find out its effectiveness and efficiency in the current operational environments.
Are You Spending Too Much on Drug Prevention Efforts? (2002). Safety Director's Report, 2(9), 2.
Gies, T. P., & Grant, G. D. (2015). Legalization of Marijuana: What It Means for Employer Drug Testing. Employee Relations Law Journal, 41(1), 35-46.
Harrop, M. (2015). Operating a Robust Workplace Drug Testing Policy. Human Resources Magazine, 20(3), 12-13.
Hadfield, L. (2006). Drug tests. Occupational Health, 58(5), 17-18.
Hilson, C. (2014). On-site Workplace Drug Testing. Human Resources Magazine, 19(2), 6-7.
Paton, N. (2004). Workplace drug tests could become routine. Occupational Health, 56(8), 4.
Kenealy, B. (2015). Drug and behavioural testing should be part of broad safety regimen. Business Insurance, 49(1), 0019
Koster, K. (2009). Drug tests: Accurate measures of impairment or ineffective invasions of privacy? Employee Benefit News, 23(14), 16-19.
Oleson, C. (2004). Negotiating and Teaching Workplace Drug Testing: A Labor Perspective. Labor Studies Journal, 28(4), 67-86.
TUC Urges Clarification of Law on Drug Testing At Work. (2010). Occupational Health, 62(7), 6.