The paper "Public Value Governance" is a great example of an assignment on management. The new public management paradigm came to transform the manner in which public management was being managed in the past. Traditionally, public management thrived in a relatively more stable environment that was easily predictable. Thus, the model was inflexible and not tailored to handle new challenges. However, with the ever-emerging changes, there was a need to come up with a more flexible method of managing the public sector because of the ever-emerging challenges that were brought about by the adoption of technology and globalization.
The new paradigm ought to be more dynamic in addressing the unpredictable changes emerging every day. This need resulted in the adoption of a new public administration strategy that is objective as well as performance-based. It employs market mechanisms that entail competition and choice, rather than the use of centralized command and control regulations that was common with the traditional method (Aberbach, Joel & Rockman 1994). The new approach of public administration guarantees appropriate matching of authority, responsibility, and accountability. The new alternative guaranteed supplementation instead of replacement where the role of representative democracy is embraced which ensures consultation and direct representation of citizens’ views.
In addition, ensures better management of government resources where more emphasis is given to the achievement of results rather than following set out instructions that were predominant with the old method. In addition, the new method brought about the professionalization of the public service where the leader does not only become a bureaucratic expert of law, but also a good manager that meets the needs of the citizens (Aberbach, Joel & Rockman 1994). 4.2 Indicate why public value governance is different in key respects from other models. Public value governance is engraved on claiming the rights of citizens to services that are democratically funded and authorized.
This model makes public managers reflect what is most valued to the services they render to the citizens and how management can enhance the quality of these services. This type of governance is unique as it appreciates the role of citizens in evaluating the services offered.
Aberbach, T., Bert A. & Rockman, J., 1994. Civil Servants and Policymakers: Neutral
or Responsive Competence? Governance. 7. 461-9
Bhatnagar, D., Rathore, A., Torres, M., and Kanungo, P.,2003. Participatory
budgeting in Brazil. Empowerment Case Studies. Washington, DC: World.
Bovart, T., and Loffler, E. 2009. Understanding Public Management and Governance.
London: University of Birmingham.
Feeley, M., 2002. Entrepreneurs of Punishment: The Legacy of Privatization.
Punishment and Society 4 (3): 321-344
Halligan, J., 2007. Accountability in Australia: Control, Paradox and Complexity.
Public Administration Quarterly. 34(4).
Heclo, Hugh. 1977. A Government of Strangers. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
Hodge, G. A., 2004. The risky business of public–private partnerships. Australian
Journal of Public Administration. 63(4), 37–49.
Hodge, G.A., and Duffield, C.F., 2007. The Australian PPP experience: observation and
reflections. New York: Prentice Hall.
Hood, C., Oliver, J. & Scott, C., 2000. Regulation inside Government:
Has It Increased, Is It Increasing, Should It Be Diminished. Public Administration
Hood, C., & Guy, P., 2004. The Middle-Ageing of New Public
Management: Into the Age of Paradox. Journal of Public Administration Research
and Theory. 14(3). 267-82.
Lawton. 1998. Ethical Issues: Ethical management of the public services. London:
University of Birmingham.
Lenihan, D.and Briggs, L., 2011. Co-Design: Toward A New Service Vision
For Australia? Co-Design. Toward A New Service Vision for Australia.5, 35-47.
Margaret, H., and Dunleavy, P. 2015. The second wave of digital-era governance: a
Quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Oxford: University of Oxford.
Moore, P., 2007. Pros and Cons of Privatization. Oxford University: London
Pallesen, T., 2007., Privatization: The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public
Management. Oslo: University of Oslo.
Segal, G. & Moore, A., 2002. Weighing the Watchman: Evaluating the Costs and
Benefits of Outsourcing Correctional Services, Part I: Employing a Best-value
Approach to Procurement. New York: Prentice hall.
Stigler, G., 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and
Management Science 3: 3-18.
Wieland, J., 2001. Corporate Governance: The Ethics of Governance. Business
Ethics Quarterly. 213(4):78-89.