Essays on What Globalisation Is, What the Environment Consists of Coursework

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "What Globalisation Is, What the Environment Consists of" is an outstanding example of business coursework.   This essay aims to identify what globalisation is? It also strives to explain what the environment consists of? It aims to understand the various ideologies that have been put forth to explain the impact that globalisation has on the environment. Globalisation can be defined as the unity that is created between countries all over the world. Unity strives to improve very many sectors of their own individual countries. This is possible through the exchange of very many ideas, principles and ideologies.

The ideologies could be political, economical, cultural or even social. This is because it is these measures that make the environment all that it is. The adoption of these diverse ideologies in these countries has far-reaching results. These results could be classified as either positive or negative results. The environment can be described as a space that represents all the earth’ s contents and their role. These can be either living or non-living things. They are governed by policies that ensure there is peaceful existence and coordination of all their affairs in the environment as argued by Ebrahim (2007). The environment, in this case, can be represented by the various aspects that make it what it is today.

It should be noted that the environment is a true representation of what it is based on. These factors include the political, economical, social, cultural and ecological factors. All these factors contribute greatly to what makes up the environment. The essay, therefore, tries to understand whether globalisation has negative impacts on the above-mentioned factors. Many theories brought forth support the notion that globalisation is a threat to the environment according to Lofdahl (2002). Globalisation is the exchange of ideas through a platform to ensure enrichment through the application of these ideas in a specified context.

Many countries have had negative impacts of the process of globalisation on their overall political processes. Their political stability and decision making processes as sovereign states have been greatly hampered as they try to globalise themselves. Many countries have had they social fabric torn as many of the people in their environments either migrate or adopt new ways that will ensure that they are part of the globalisation process as stated by Samman (2011). Section 1 The stability of very many nations all over the world is pegged on the ability of the political process to ensure that there is stability.

It is true that the general process of globalisation is a threat to the environment. This is in relation to the political aspect that ensures that there is calm and stability in this environment. Once the process of globalisation has been accepted in an area, then the political process has to ensure that they have measures in place to deal with the incorporated aspects of globalisation.

The threat to the political process is attained in several ways as illustrated by Weinstein (2005). Once a said environment has bowed to the globalisation pressure, the environment’ s sole importance drastically reduces. This is because it is now expected to conduct itself with the confines of the general acts and attitudes of globalised states. This environment now finds it very difficult to come up with ideas that do not include global expectations.

In many cases, these ideas do not augur well with the common citizens of these environments. Through the general podium of exchanging ideas, specific environments are weighed heavily with the ideas and the principles that govern other environments. This results in a situation where environments adopt ideas that are against their general capabilities. As mentioned above, an environment should have a conducive aura to ensure that it thrives. These circumstances need to be propagated by the thoughts of the people who are either living in these environments or they contribute to the leadership process of these environments.

This leads to the creation of laws and regulations as argued by Steger (2003).


Bhagwati, J. 2000, ‘On Thinking Clearly About the Linkage Between Trade and the Environment’, Environment and Development Economics, vol. 5, no.4, pp. 485-496.

Brack, D 2006, International Trade and the Montreal Protocol, Chatham House, London.

Charnovitz, S 2002, ‘A World Environment Organization’, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 323-362.

Dahan, Y & Lerner, H 2011, ‘Global Justice, Labor Standards and Responsibility’, Journals on Globalisation, vol. 12, Retrieved from

Ebrahim, S & Garcia, J 2007, ‘Globalisation of Behavioural Risks needs Faster Diffusion of Interventions’, Journals on globalisation, vol. 4, no. 2. Retrieved from

Lecher, FJ 2009, Globalisation: The Making of World Society, Wiley-Blackwell, New York.

Lofdahl, CL 2002, Environmental impacts of globlization and trade: a systems study, MIT Press, Michigan.

Martens, P & Akin, S 2010, ‘Is Globalisation Healthy? A Statistical Indicator Analysis of the Impacts of Globalisation on Health’, Journal of Globalisation and Health, vol. 6, no. 16. Retrieved From

Naghshpour, S 2008, ‘Globalisation: Is it Good or Bad?’, Journals on Globalisation, Special Edition. Retrieved from

Samman, A 2011, ‘The Idea of a Crisis’, Journal of Critical Globalisation studies, vol. 4. Retrieved from

Steger, MB 2003, Globalisation: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Tam, HB 2001, Progressive Politics in the Global Age, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Ufomba, HU 2009, ‘The Bad and the Ugly: Intellectualism, Capital, Globalisation and the Economic Conditioning of Africa’, Retrieved from

Weinstein, MM 2005, Globalisation: What’s New?, Columbia University Press, New York.

Wells, GJ & Shuey, R 2001, Globalisation, Nova Science Publishers, New York.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us